Literature DB >> 28877496

Acceleration Strategies to Enhance Metabolic Ensemble Modeling Performance.

Jennifer L Greene1, Andreas Wäechter2, Keith E J Tyo1, Linda J Broadbelt3.   

Abstract

Developing reliable, predictive kinetic models of metabolism is a difficult, yet necessary, priority toward understanding and deliberately altering cellular behavior. Constraint-based modeling has enabled the fields of metabolic engineering and systems biology to make great strides in interrogating cellular metabolism but does not provide sufficient insight into regulation or kinetic limitations of metabolic pathways. Moreover, the growth-optimized assumptions that constraint-based models often rely on do not hold when studying stationary or persistor cell populations. However, developing kinetic models provides many unique challenges, as many of the kinetic parameters and rate laws governing individual enzymes are unknown. Ensemble modeling (EM) was developed to circumnavigate this challenge and effectively sample the large kinetic parameter solution space using consistent experimental datasets. Unfortunately, EM, in its base form, requires long solve times to complete and often leads to unstable kinetic model predictions. Furthermore, these limitations scale prohibitively with increasing model size. As larger metabolic models are developed with increasing genetic information and experimental validation, the demand to incorporate kinetic information increases. Therefore, in this work, we have begun to tackle the challenges of EM by introducing additional steps to the existing method framework specifically through reducing computation time and optimizing parameter sampling. We first reduce the structural complexity of the network by removing dependent species, and second, we sample locally stable parameter sets to reflect realistic biological states of cells. Lastly, we presort the screening data to eliminate the most incorrect predictions in the earliest screening stages, saving further calculations in later stages. Our complementary improvements to this EM framework are easily incorporated into concurrent EM efforts and broaden the application opportunities and accessibility of kinetic modeling across the field.
Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28877496      PMCID: PMC5611682          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  43 in total

Review 1.  Conservation analysis in biochemical networks: computational issues for software writers.

Authors:  Herbert M Sauro; Brian Ingalls
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 2.  Constructing kinetic models of metabolism at genome-scales: A review.

Authors:  Shyam Srinivasan; William R Cluett; Radhakrishnan Mahadevan
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  An entropy-like index of bifurcational robustness for metabolic systems.

Authors:  Jimmy G Lafontaine Rivera; Yun Lee; James C Liao
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Towards building the silicon cell: a modular approach.

Authors:  Jacky L Snoep; Frank Bruggeman; Brett G Olivier; Hans V Westerhoff
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  The growing scope of applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions using Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Adam M Feist; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Optimization-driven identification of genetic perturbations accelerates the convergence of model parameters in ensemble modeling of metabolic networks.

Authors:  Ali R Zomorrodi; Jimmy G Lafontaine Rivera; James C Liao; Costas D Maranas
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  The nature of systems biology.

Authors:  Frank J Bruggeman; Hans V Westerhoff
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 17.079

8.  A genome-scale Escherichia coli kinetic metabolic model k-ecoli457 satisfying flux data for multiple mutant strains.

Authors:  Ali Khodayari; Costas D Maranas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions.

Authors:  Matthew A Oberhardt; Bernhard Ø Palsson; Jason A Papin
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  The stability and robustness of metabolic states: identifying stabilizing sites in metabolic networks.

Authors:  Sergio Grimbs; Joachim Selbig; Sascha Bulik; Hermann-Georg Holzhütter; Ralf Steuer
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Metabolic kinetic modeling provides insight into complex biological questions, but hurdles remain.

Authors:  Jonathan Strutz; Jacob Martin; Jennifer Greene; Linda Broadbelt; Keith Tyo
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 9.740

2.  Understanding biochemical design principles with ensembles of canonical non-linear models.

Authors:  Lukas Bromig; Andreas Kremling; Alberto Marin-Sanguino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Bayesian inference of metabolic kinetics from genome-scale multiomics data.

Authors:  Peter C St John; Jonathan Strutz; Linda J Broadbelt; Keith E J Tyo; Yannick J Bomble
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 4.475

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.