Literature DB >> 28875592

Comparison of linear intrascan and interscan dynamic ranges of Orbitrap and ion-mobility time-of-flight mass spectrometers.

Anton Kaufmann1, Stephan Walker1.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: The linear intrascan and interscan dynamic ranges of mass spectrometers are important in metabolome and residue analysis. A large linear dynamic range is mandatory if both low- and high-abundance ions have to be detected and quantitated in heavy matrix samples. These performance criteria, as provided by modern high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), were systematically investigated.
METHODS: The comparison included two generations of Orbitraps, and an ion mobility quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) system In addition, different scan modes, as provided by the utilized instruments, were investigated. Calibration curves of different compounds covering a concentration range of five orders of magnitude were measured to evaluate the linear interscan dynamic range. The linear intrascan dynamic range and the resulting mass accuracy were evaluated by repeating these measurements in the presence of a very intense background.
RESULTS: Modern HRMS instruments can show linear dynamic ranges of five orders of magnitude. Often, however, the linear dynamic range is limited by the detection capability (sensitivity and selectivity) and by the electrospray ionization. Orbitraps, as opposed to TOF instruments, show a reduced intrascan dynamic range. This is due to the limited C-trap and Orbitrap capacity. The tested TOF instrument shows poorer mass accuracies than the Orbitraps. In contrast, hyphenation with an ion-mobility device seems not to affect the linear dynamic range.
CONCLUSIONS: The linear dynamic range of modern HRMS instrumentation has been significantly improved. This also refers to the virtual absence of systematic mass shifts at high ion abundances. The intrascan dynamic range of the current Orbitrap technology may still be a limitation when analyzing complex matrix extracts. On the other hand, the linear dynamic range is not only limited by the detector technology, but can also be shortened by peripheral devices, where the ionization and transfer of ions take place.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28875592     DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 0951-4198            Impact factor:   2.419


  7 in total

1.  PACAP and Other Neuropeptide Targets Link Chronic Migraine and Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia in Mouse Models.

Authors:  Krishna D. B. Anapindi; Ning Yang; Elena V Romanova; Stanislav S Rubakhin; Alycia Tipton; Isaac Dripps; Zoie Sheets; Jonathan V Sweedler; Amynah A Pradhan
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Targeted and Untargeted Detection of DNA Adducts of Aromatic Amine Carcinogens in Human Bladder by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jingshu Guo; Peter W Villalta; Christopher J Weight; Radha Bonala; Francis Johnson; Thomas A Rosenquist; Robert J Turesky
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Ion Mobility Separation-Quadruple Time-of-Flight MS (UHPLC-IMS-QTOF MS) Metabolomics for Short-Term Biomarker Discovery of Orange Intake: A Randomized, Controlled Crossover Study.

Authors:  Leticia Lacalle-Bergeron; Tania Portolés; Francisco J López; Juan Vicente Sancho; Carolina Ortega-Azorín; Eva M Asensio; Oscar Coltell; Dolores Corella
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Screening 89 Pesticides in Fishery Drugs by Ultrahigh Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer.

Authors:  Shou-Ying Wang; Cong Kong; Qing-Ping Chen; Hui-Juan Yu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Targeted High Resolution LC/MS3 Adductomics Method for the Characterization of Endogenous DNA Damage.

Authors:  Andrea Carrà; Valeria Guidolin; Romel P Dator; Pramod Upadhyaya; Fekadu Kassie; Peter W Villalta; Silvia Balbo
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 5.221

6.  Exact mass GC-MS analysis: Protocol, database, advantages and application to plant metabolic profiling.

Authors:  Cyril Abadie; Julie Lalande; Guillaume Tcherkez
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 7.947

7.  MSLibrarian: Optimized Predicted Spectral Libraries for Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics.

Authors:  Marc Isaksson; Christofer Karlsson; Thomas Laurell; Agnete Kirkeby; Moritz Heusel
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.370

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.