Literature DB >> 28875558

Spinal Cord Stimulator Explantation: Motives for Removal of Surgically Placed Paddle Systems.

Derrick A Dupré1, Nestor Tomycz1, Donald Whiting1, Michael Oh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite requiring successful trials prior to implantation, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems for pain are often later removed. Removing surgically implanted hardware subjects patients to the risks and discomfort of a second surgery, threatens the cost-effectiveness of SCS, and limits the perceived durability of SCS technology for pain problems.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate patterns of reasons given among patients who underwent SCS explant surgery (SCSES).
METHODS: Retrospective review of SCSES cases over 17 years at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.
RESULTS: 165 patients underwent SCSES between 1997 and 2014. The top 3 reasons for explantation were inadequate pain control (IPC; 73%), hardware discomfort (22%), and need for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (10%). Other less frequent reasons were infection (9%), painful dysesthesias (9%), electrical arcing (4%), resolution of inciting symptoms (4%), weakness (2%), pseudomeningocele (1%) and muscle spasms (1%).
CONCLUSION: Inadequate pain control is the most common reason for SCSES. Advances in technology are needed to improve the quality and duration of pain control, as well as to design improvements to make the hardware more comfortable. A significant number of implants are removed due to need for MRI, a fact obviating the need for MRI-compatible systems. Patients considering SCS paddle lead placement should be counseled on the most common reasons for later explantation.
© 2017 World Institute of Pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  back pain; causalgia; complex regional pain syndromes; electric stimulation therapy; neuralgia; painful diabetic neuropathy; painful paresthesia; spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28875558     DOI: 10.1111/papr.12639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Pract        ISSN: 1530-7085            Impact factor:   3.183


  8 in total

1.  Retrospective Assessment of Salvage to 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Patients Who Failed Traditional SCS Therapy: RESCUE Study.

Authors:  Leonardo Kapural; Dawood Sayed; Brian Kim; Caroline Harstroem; James Deering
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 2.  A Review of Clinical Data on Salvage Therapy in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Rajiv D Reddy; Roya Moheimani; Gregory G Yu; Krishnan V Chakravarthy
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-11-07

3.  Sustained Long-Term Outcomes With Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation: 12-Month Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label Avalon Study.

Authors:  Marc Russo; Charles Brooker; Michael J Cousins; Nathan Taylor; Tillman Boesel; Richard Sullivan; Lewis Holford; Erin Hanson; Gerrit Eduard Gmel; Nastaran Hesam Shariati; Lawrence Poree; John Parker
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Clinical Review.

Authors:  Terje Kirketeig; Carsten Schultheis; Xander Zuidema; Corey W Hunter; Timothy Deer
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  The Evolution of Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Forward-Looking Perspectives.

Authors:  Michael A Fishman; Ajay Antony; Michael Esposito; Timothy Deer; Robert Levy
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Images in Practice: Replacement of an 18-Year-Old Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Lead with Cylindrical Leads Under Direct Visualization.

Authors:  Philip M Shumsky; Christopher S Wie; John A Freeman; Omar Viswanath; Naresh P Patel
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2020-07-04

7.  60-Day PNS Treatment May Improve Identification of Delayed Responders and Delayed Non-Responders to Neurostimulation for Pain Relief.

Authors:  Ramana Naidu; Sean Li; Mehul J Desai; Samir Sheth; Nathan D Crosby; Joseph W Boggs
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  High-frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Cost-consequence and Cost-effectiveness Analyses.

Authors:  Rod S Taylor; Anthony Bentley; Bruce Campbell; Kieran Murphy
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.423

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.