| Literature DB >> 28875136 |
Dong-Min Jeong1, Yoo-Jin Shin1, Na-Ra Lee2, Ho-Kyung Lim3, Han-Wool Choung1, Kang-Mi Pang1,2, Bong-Ju Kim2,4, Soung-Min Kim1,4, Jong-Ho Lee1,2,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish normative data for healthy Korean adults by measuring the maximal strength and endurance scores of the tongue, lip, and cheek, and to examine correlations between these measurements.Entities:
Keywords: Cheek; Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI); Korean; Lip; Tongue
Year: 2017 PMID: 28875136 PMCID: PMC5583196 DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.4.221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg ISSN: 1225-1585
Fig. 1The Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) is used to measure the pressure of the anatomical structures in the oral cavity. B. The position of the tongue bulb placed on the maxillary anterior hard palate area when measuring the maximal tongue strength and endurance score. C. The tongue bulb is placed in between two tongue depressors, the lips must be pursed forward with maximum force when measuring the maximal lip strength and endurance score.
Maximal strength and endurance scores of tongue, lip, cheek according to age groups
| Maximal tongue strength (kPa) | Tongue endurance (s) | Maximal lip strength (kPa) | Lip endurance (s) | Maximal cheek strength (kPa) | Cheek endurance (s) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-39 yr | Male (n=20) | 46.7±10.2 | 28.8±12.6 | 11.6±3.0 | 41.1±23.9 | 24.5±4.6 | 47.8±24.4 |
| Female (n=20) | 32.1±7.9 | 20.8±13.5 | 11.4±3.8 | 22.4±21.7 | 20.5±4.3 | 43.9±25.0 | |
| 40-59 yr | Male (n=20) | 40.9±9.3 | 17.0±8.5 | 11.4±4.2 | 24.3±10.3 | 25.2±6.4 | 27.3±11.3 |
| Female (n=20) | 36.9±8.6 | 15.3±5.2 | 11.1±5.1 | 30.5±13.4 | 21.2±5.5 | 20.0±14.6 | |
| ≥60 yr | Male (n=20) | 35.2±9.0 | 15.8±6.7 | 14.5±3.9 | 24.9±11.0 | 22.4±5.3 | 21.7±14.5 |
| Female (n=20) | 34.5±6.9 | 17.9±8.1 | 11.7±2.6 | 12.8±7.6 | 18.0±4.8 | 17.2±11.4 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
Differences between age groups and genders with two-way ANOVA test, and across age groups including post-hoc results
| Maximal tongue strength | Tongue endurance | Maximal lip strength | Lip endurance | Maximal cheek strength | Cheek endurance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two-way ANOVA test | ||||||
| Age | 0.041* | 0.000* | 0.070 | 0.002* | 0.030* | 0.000* |
| Gender | 0.000* | 0.150 | 0.117 | 0.005* | 0.000* | 0.107 |
| Age×gender | 0.001* | 0.063 | 0.246 | 0.002* | 0.981 | 0.891 |
| Post-hoc analysis | ||||||
| Young vs. middle-aged | 0.964 | 0.000* | 0.963 | 0.439 | 0.820 | 0.000* |
| Middle-aged vs. older | 0.098 | 0.935 | 0.087 | 0.046* | 0.030* | 0.551 |
| Young vs. older | 0.055 | 0.001* | 0.150 | 0.001* | 0.123 | 0.000* |
*Significant differences at P<0.05.
Correlations between age, maximal strength and tongue, lip and cheek endurance
| Age | Maximal strength of tongue | Tongue endurance | Maximal strength of lip | Lip endurance | Maximal strength of cheek | Cheek endurance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1 | ||||||
| Maximal tongue strength | –0.156 | 1 | |||||
| Tongue endurance | –0.279** | 0.185* | 1 | ||||
| Maximal lip strength | 0.082 | 0.242** | 0.208* | 1 | |||
| Lip endurance | –0.232* | 0.304** | 0.211* | 0.026 | 1 | ||
| Maximal cheek strength | –0.094 | 0.429** | 0.207* | 0.126 | 0.197* | 1 | |
| Cheek endurance | –0.486** | 0.351** | 0.588** | 0.240** | 0.209* | 0.189* | 1 |
*The correlation coefficient is significant at the 0.05 level.
**The correlation coefficient is significant at the 0.01 level.
Fig. 2Correlation between age, maximal strength and endurance of tongue, lip and cheek.