Sriram Yennurajalingam1, Nizar M Tannir2, Janet L Williams1, Zhanni Lu1, Kenneth R Hess3, Susan Frisbee-Hume1, Helen L House1, Zita Dubauskas Lim2, Kyu-Hyoung Lim1,4, Gabriel Lopez1, Akhila Reddy1, Ahsan Azhar1, Angelique Wong1, Sunil M Patel5, Deborah A Kuban6, Ahmed Omar Kaseb7, Lorenzo Cohen1, Eduardo Bruera1. 1. Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine 2. Genitourinary Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 3. Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea 5. Departments of General Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 6. Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 7. Departments of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Abstract
Background: Despite the high frequency, severity, and effects of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with cancer, limited treatment options are available. The primary objective of this study was to compare the effects of oral Panax ginseng extract (PG) and placebo on CRF. Secondary objectives were to determine the effects of PG on QoL, mood, and function. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with CRF ≥4/10 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) were eligible. Based on a pilot study, we randomized patients to receive either 400 mg of standardized PG twice daily or a matching placebo for 28 days. The primary end point was change in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) subscale from baseline to day 29. Results:Of 127 patients, 112 (88.2%) were evaluable. The mean (SD) FACIT-F subscale scores at baseline, day 15, and day 29 were 22.4 (10.1), 29.9 (10.6), and 30.1 (11.6) for PG (P<.001), and 24.0 (9.4), 30.0 (10.1), and 30.4 (11.5) for placebo (P<.001). Mean (SD) improvement in the FACIT-F subscale at day 29 was not significantly different in the PG than in the placebo group (7.5 [12.7] vs 6.5 [9.9]; P=.67). QoL, anxiety, depression, symptoms, and functional scores were not significantly different between the PG and placebo groups. Improvement in the FACIT-F subscale correlated with baseline scores (P=.0005), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale results (P=.032), and sex (P=.023). There were fewer any-grade toxicities in the PG versus placebo group (28/63 vs 33/64; P=.024). Conclusions: Both PG and placebo result in significant improvement in CRF. PG was not significantly superior to placebo after 4 weeks of treatment. There is no justification to recommend the use of PG for CRF. Further studies are needed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01375114.
RCT Entities:
Background: Despite the high frequency, severity, and effects of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with cancer, limited treatment options are available. The primary objective of this study was to compare the effects of oral Panax ginseng extract (PG) and placebo on CRF. Secondary objectives were to determine the effects of PG on QoL, mood, and function. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with CRF ≥4/10 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) were eligible. Based on a pilot study, we randomized patients to receive either 400 mg of standardized PG twice daily or a matching placebo for 28 days. The primary end point was change in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) subscale from baseline to day 29. Results: Of 127 patients, 112 (88.2%) were evaluable. The mean (SD) FACIT-F subscale scores at baseline, day 15, and day 29 were 22.4 (10.1), 29.9 (10.6), and 30.1 (11.6) for PG (P<.001), and 24.0 (9.4), 30.0 (10.1), and 30.4 (11.5) for placebo (P<.001). Mean (SD) improvement in the FACIT-F subscale at day 29 was not significantly different in the PG than in the placebo group (7.5 [12.7] vs 6.5 [9.9]; P=.67). QoL, anxiety, depression, symptoms, and functional scores were not significantly different between the PG and placebo groups. Improvement in the FACIT-F subscale correlated with baseline scores (P=.0005), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale results (P=.032), and sex (P=.023). There were fewer any-grade toxicities in the PG versus placebo group (28/63 vs 33/64; P=.024). Conclusions: Both PG and placebo result in significant improvement in CRF. PG was not significantly superior to placebo after 4 weeks of treatment. There is no justification to recommend the use of PG for CRF. Further studies are needed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01375114.
Authors: Pedro Nazareth Aguiar Junior; Carmelia Maria Noia Barreto; Daniel de Iracema Gomes Cubero; Auro Del Giglio Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: J Feliu; V Heredia-Soto; R Gironés; B Jiménez-Munarriz; J Saldaña; C Guillén-Ponce; M J Molina-Garrido Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Julia E Inglis; Po-Ju Lin; Sarah L Kerns; Ian R Kleckner; Amber S Kleckner; Daniel A Castillo; Karen M Mustian; Luke J Peppone Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2019-01-26 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: Carlo Buonerba; Pietro De Placido; Dario Bruzzese; Martina Pagliuca; Paola Ungaro; Davide Bosso; Dario Ribera; Simona Iaccarino; Luca Scafuri; Antonietta Liotti; Valeria Romeo; Michela Izzo; Francesco Perri; Beniamino Casale; Giuseppe Grimaldi; Francesca Vitrone; Arturo Brunetti; Daniela Terracciano; Alfredo Marinelli; Sabino De Placido; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2018-03-16 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Julie R Brahmer; Hamzah Abu-Sbeih; Paolo Antonio Ascierto; Jill Brufsky; Laura C Cappelli; Frank B Cortazar; David E Gerber; Lamya Hamad; Eric Hansen; Douglas B Johnson; Mario E Lacouture; Gregory A Masters; Jarushka Naidoo; Michele Nanni; Miguel-Angel Perales; Igor Puzanov; Bianca D Santomasso; Satish P Shanbhag; Rajeev Sharma; Dimitra Skondra; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michelle Turner; Marc S Ernstoff Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 13.751