L Rodwell1, H Romaniuk1, W Nilsen2, J B Carlin1, K J Lee1, G C Patton3. 1. Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit,Murdoch Childrens Research Institute,Parkville, VIC,Australia. 2. Work Research Institute,Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences,Oslo,Norway. 3. Department of Paediatrics,Faculty of Medicine,Dentistry and Health Sciences,The University of Melbourne,Melbourne, VIC,Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Young adults who are not in employment, education, or training (NEET) are at risk of long-term economic disadvantage and social exclusion. Knowledge about risk factors for being NEET largely comes from cross-sectional studies of vulnerable individuals. Using data collected over a 10-year period, we examined adolescent predictors of being NEET in young adulthood. METHODS: We used data on 1938 participants from the Victorian Adolescent Health Cohort Study, a community-based longitudinal study of adolescents in Victoria, Australia. Associations between common mental disorders, disruptive behaviour, cannabis use and drinking behaviour in adolescence, and NEET status at two waves of follow-up in young adulthood (mean ages of 20.7 and 24.1 years) were investigated using logistic regression, with generalised estimating equations used to account for the repeated outcome measure. RESULTS: Overall, 8.5% of the participants were NEET at age 20.7 years and 8.2% at 24.1 years. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found evidence of increased risk of being NEET among frequent adolescent cannabis users [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) = 1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-2.75] and those who reported repeated disruptive behaviours (ORadj = 1.71; 95% CI 1.15-2.55) or persistent common mental disorders in adolescence (ORadj = 1.60; 95% CI 1.07-2.40). Similar associations were present when participants with children were included in the same category as those in employment, education, or training. CONCLUSIONS: Young people with an early onset of mental health and behavioural problems are at risk of failing to make the transition from school to employment. This finding reinforces the importance of integrated employment and mental health support programmes.
BACKGROUND: Young adults who are not in employment, education, or training (NEET) are at risk of long-term economic disadvantage and social exclusion. Knowledge about risk factors for being NEET largely comes from cross-sectional studies of vulnerable individuals. Using data collected over a 10-year period, we examined adolescent predictors of being NEET in young adulthood. METHODS: We used data on 1938 participants from the Victorian Adolescent Health Cohort Study, a community-based longitudinal study of adolescents in Victoria, Australia. Associations between common mental disorders, disruptive behaviour, cannabis use and drinking behaviour in adolescence, and NEET status at two waves of follow-up in young adulthood (mean ages of 20.7 and 24.1 years) were investigated using logistic regression, with generalised estimating equations used to account for the repeated outcome measure. RESULTS: Overall, 8.5% of the participants were NEET at age 20.7 years and 8.2% at 24.1 years. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found evidence of increased risk of being NEET among frequent adolescent cannabis users [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) = 1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-2.75] and those who reported repeated disruptive behaviours (ORadj = 1.71; 95% CI 1.15-2.55) or persistent common mental disorders in adolescence (ORadj = 1.60; 95% CI 1.07-2.40). Similar associations were present when participants with children were included in the same category as those in employment, education, or training. CONCLUSIONS: Young people with an early onset of mental health and behavioural problems are at risk of failing to make the transition from school to employment. This finding reinforces the importance of integrated employment and mental health support programmes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cannabis use; NEET; common mental disorder; disruptive behaviour; unemployment
Authors: Iman Alaie; Anna Philipson; Richard Ssegonja; William E Copeland; Mia Ramklint; Hannes Bohman; Ulf Jonsson Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: José A López-López; Alex S F Kwong; Liz Washbrook; Kate Tilling; Mina S Fazel; Rebecca M Pearson Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Henrik Dobewall; Leena Koivusilta; Sakari Karvonen; Pirjo Lindfors; Jaana M Kinnunen; Mari-Pauliina Vainikainen; Arja Rimpelä Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Frank Iorfino; Daniel F Hermens; Shane Pm Cross; Natalia Zmicerevska; Alissa Nichles; Caro-Anne Badcock; Josine Groot; Elizabeth M Scott; Ian B Hickie Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Matilde Leonardi; Davide Guido; Rui Quintas; Fabiola Silvaggi; Erika Guastafierro; Andrea Martinuzzi; Somnath Chatterji; Seppo Koskinen; Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk; Josep Maria Haro; Maria Cabello; Alberto Raggi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 3.390