| Literature DB >> 28874149 |
Christin Schoppe1, Maren Hellige2, Karl Rohn3, Bernhard Ohnesorge2, Astrid Bienert-Zeit2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Modern imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have the advantage of producing images without superimposition. Whilst CT is a well-established technique for dental diagnostics, MRI examinations are rarely used for the evaluation of dental diseases in horses. Regarding equine endodontic therapies which are increasingly implemented, MRI could help to portray changes of the periodontal ligament and display gross pulpar anatomy. Knowledge of age-related changes is essential for diagnosis, as cheek teeth and surrounding structures alter with increasing age. The aim of the present study was to highlight the advantages of CT and MRI regarding age-related changes in selected equine cheek teeth and their adjacent structures.Entities:
Keywords: 3 tesla; Age-related variances; Ct; Endodontic disease; Equine maxillary cheek teeth; High-field MRI; Horse; Periodontal
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28874149 PMCID: PMC5585999 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-1200-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Imaging techniques and settings
| Imaging technique | Sequence | Orientation | Matrix | TR | TE (ms) | ST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRI | T1w | 3D | 1024 | 8.5 | 3.9 | 0.9 |
| T2w | transverse | 1024 | 4500 | 80 | 3.1 | |
| T2w | dorsal | 1024 | 3000 | 80 | 4 | |
| PDw | dorsal | 1024 | 6400 | 30 | 4 | |
| STIR | transverse | 960 | 8872 | 30 | 3 | |
| CT | Helical Scan | transverse | 1024 | 1.5 | ||
TE echo time, TR time to repetition, ST slice thickness
Anatomical landmarks of dental structures depicted in MRI and CT referring to imaging advantages
| Anatomical region | CT | MRI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endodontic system | Dental sac | Low attenuated tissue surrounding the reserve crown of growing cheek teeth (transverse) | High signal intensity, marked off by the alveolar bone with low signal intensity |
| Common pulp cavity | Low attenuated pulp tissue in young maxillary teeth (transverse) | Hyperintense soft tissue, present in young cheek teeth (T2w transverse, PDw dorsal)* | |
| Pulps | Generally five pulp horns with very low density visible, moderate to well distinguishable from the hyperdense hard dental tissue; | Generally five hyperintense pulp horns visible | |
| Anatomical crown | Tooth root | Isodense root (transverse)* | Isointense: with good alignment of the MRI scan, well demarcated structure (T2w transverse) |
| Clinical crown | Hard dental tissue, distinction to the oral cavity | Dentine, cement and enamel: distinction possible through the different grade of attenuation; | Dentine, cement and enamel: signal free, not distinguishable (T2w and STIR transverse) |
*superior imaging modality by comparison of the respective structure in CT and MR images (in brackets: the best imaging modalities and section planes)
Anatomical landmarks of periodontal and adjacent structures depicted in MRI and CT referring to imaging advantages
| Anatomical region | CT | MRI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Periodontal apparatus | Periodontal space: | Slightly blurry, isodense gap between hard dental tissue and alveolar bone, moderate distinction from hard dental and bony tissue (transverse, dorsal) | Hyperintense gap, good distinction of hard dental tissue and alveolar bone* |
| Alveolar bone | Hyperdense bone* | Hypointense cortical bone, marked off by the PDL (T2w and STIR transverse) | |
| Maxillary sinus | Mucosa and cortical bone | Respiratory epithelium: not visible; sinus: air-filled and hypodense; hyperdense thin-walled cortical bone* (transverse) | Signal free cortical bone, delineated by a hyperintense line of mucosa* (T2w and STIR transverse) |
| IOC | Soft tissue inside and bony structures | Soft tissue inside the canal: low attenuated | IOC: signal free, becomes evident through the bright mucosa covering the bony surface of the maxillary sinus (T2w and STIR transverse) |
*superior imaging modality by comparison of the respective structure in CT and MR images (in brackets: the best imaging modalities and section planes)
Fig. 1Measurements of pulpar sizes and distance between alveolus and infraorbital canal (IOC). Pulp dimensions of an 8.5-year-old tooth (108, dorsal plane) in PDw magnetic resonance images (a); distance between the alveolar socket and the IOC in a 6-year-old tooth (209, transversal plane) using CT imaging (b)
Calculated dental age of the upper 08 s and 09 s related to the horses’ age
| Age group | Horses’ age in years | Dental age in years: 08 s (n) | Dental age in years: 09 s (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | < 6 | < 2.5 (6) | < 5.5 (6) |
| B | 6–15 | 2.5–12.5 (6) | 5.5–15.5 (6) |
| C | ≥ 16 | ≥ 12.5 (6) | ≥ 15.5 (6) |
Fig. 2Semi-logarithmic scale of age-related pulp horn sizes (pulp 1 - pulp 5). Pulps were measured in the mid-tooth section of the maxillary 08 s and 09 s in MR image scans (PDw, dorsal orientation); P1-P5: Pulp horn 1–5
Pulp parameters. MRI measurements were conducted in the mid-tooth section of the upper maxillary 08 s and 09 s. Results show pulp parameters independent of age; n = number of pulp horns; P1-P5: Pulp 1–5
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 35 | 36 | 34 | 36 | 36 |
| Mean (mm) | 4.89 | 5.81 | 5.57 | 7.32 | 3.45 |
| s.d. (mm) | 2.59 | 3.26 | 3.42 | 4.78 | 1.65 |
| Median (mm) | 3.89 | 3.75 | 5.24 | 5.67 | 3.17 |
| Range (mm) | 7.15 | 8.76 | 10.09 | 13.02 | 5.30 |
| xmin – xmax (mm) | 2.19–9.34 | 2.16–0.91 | 1.3–11.39 | 1.28–14.31 | 1.57–6.87 |
Fig. 4Different mean reduction of each pulp between different age groups. Mean pulpar sizes presented in different age groups, measured in dorsally orientated MRI scans. Boxes show the range between the mean largest and smallest pulp in each age group. P1 – P5 present pulp horn 1 to pulp horn 5
Fig. 3Pulp measurements of MR images in different age groups. Examination was performed with PDw scans. Horizontal whiskers represent statistically significant differences in size between pulp horns. Boxes represent the interquartile range, vertical whiskers the range and “+” show mean in all boxplots; P1-P5: pulp horn 1–5
Fig. 5Age-related distance between selected cheek teeth (n = 36) and the IOC. Scatterplot of the distance between dental alveoli of 08 s and 09 s and the bony IOC measured in transverse CT images