BACKGROUND: Studies showing the potential predictive value of the actin-binding protein gelsolin, in critically ill patients are scarce. Moreover, even up to now a rapid automated measurement of gelsolin has still remained a challenge. Therefore, we developed and validated an automated serum gelsolin immune turbidimetric assay for possible clinical use. METHODS: Validation of serum gelsolin assay was performed on a Cobas 8000/c502 analyzer (Roche) according to the second edition of Eurachem guidelines. Furthermore, we also studied the diagnostic value of serum gelsolin in sepsis when investigating sera of septic (n = 25), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS; n = 8) and control patients (n = 14). We compared our previously published Western blot data with those of the new turbidimetric assay. RESULTS: The sample volume was 7 μL and the assay time was 10 minutes. The detection limit was 0.72 mg/L, intra- and inter-assay imprecision remained in most cases less than 5% expressed as CV. Recovery was found to be 84.56%-93.52% and linearity study gave an appropriate correlation coefficient by linear regression analysis (r2 = .998). Septic patients exhibited lower (P = .015) first-day serum gelsolin levels than SIRS patients, which confirmed our previous Western blot results. The determined cut-off point for serum gelsolin was 14.05 mg/L (sensitivity: 75%; specificity: 60%) when investigating its diagnostic value in sepsis. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, our immune turbidimetric measurement offers a rapid and accurate quantitation of gelsolin in human serum samples. Serum gelsolin seems a promising additional diagnostic marker of sepsis which has to be further investigated.
BACKGROUND: Studies showing the potential predictive value of the actin-binding protein gelsolin, in critically illpatients are scarce. Moreover, even up to now a rapid automated measurement of gelsolin has still remained a challenge. Therefore, we developed and validated an automated serum gelsolin immune turbidimetric assay for possible clinical use. METHODS: Validation of serum gelsolin assay was performed on a Cobas 8000/c502 analyzer (Roche) according to the second edition of Eurachem guidelines. Furthermore, we also studied the diagnostic value of serum gelsolin in sepsis when investigating sera of septic (n = 25), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS; n = 8) and control patients (n = 14). We compared our previously published Western blot data with those of the new turbidimetric assay. RESULTS: The sample volume was 7 μL and the assay time was 10 minutes. The detection limit was 0.72 mg/L, intra- and inter-assay imprecision remained in most cases less than 5% expressed as CV. Recovery was found to be 84.56%-93.52% and linearity study gave an appropriate correlation coefficient by linear regression analysis (r2 = .998). Septic patients exhibited lower (P = .015) first-day serum gelsolin levels than SIRS patients, which confirmed our previous Western blot results. The determined cut-off point for serum gelsolin was 14.05 mg/L (sensitivity: 75%; specificity: 60%) when investigating its diagnostic value in sepsis. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, our immune turbidimetric measurement offers a rapid and accurate quantitation of gelsolin in human serum samples. Serum gelsolin seems a promising additional diagnostic marker of sepsis which has to be further investigated.
Authors: Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robert Bucki; Fitzroy J Byfield; Alina Kulakowska; Margaret E McCormick; Wieslaw Drozdowski; Zbigniew Namiot; Thomas Hartung; Paul A Janmey Journal: J Immunol Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Robert Bucki; Penelope C Georges; Quentin Espinassous; Makoto Funaki; Jennifer J Pastore; Richard Chaby; Paul A Janmey Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2005-07-19 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Shalini Nag; Qing Ma; Hui Wang; Sakesit Chumnarnsilpa; Wei Lin Lee; Mårten Larsson; Balakrishnan Kannan; Maria Hernandez-Valladares; Leslie D Burtnick; Robert C Robinson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-08-04 Impact factor: 11.205