Literature DB >> 28871633

Evaluation of Aintree LOSS, a community-based, multidisciplinary weight management service: outcomes and predictors of engagement.

T Steele1, R P Narayanan1, M James2, J James2, N Mazey3, J P H Wilding1.   

Abstract

Aintree LOSS is a community-based, multidisciplinary weight management programme for patients with severe and complex obesity, focusing on a flexible and individualized service with follow-up for up to 2 years. We evaluated all 2472 patients referred to the service between October 2009 and 2013. Demographic data were recorded at baseline, with the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) used to measure socioeconomic deprivation. Weight was recorded at each visit. Mean body mass index at baseline was 45.6 (standard deviation 6.8), and 58.9% of patients lived in areas in the most deprived decile nationally. Of 2315 appropriate referrals, 1249 (55.1%) attended >2 visits; mean final weight loss was 3.50 ± 8.55 kg, and 24.1% achieved ≥5% weight loss. Of the patients, 754 (33.3%) attended for over 6 months; mean final weight loss was 4.94 ± 10 kg, and 34% achieved 5% weight loss. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed increasing age, residence in a less deprived area and sleep apnoea to be independently associated with attendance for >6 months, and there was a linear relationship between 6-month attendance and deprivation quintile. Year-on-year analyses showed improvement in engagement over time, coinciding with efforts to improve access to the service. This work shows a multidisciplinary, community-based weight loss programme prioritizing a fully flexible and individualized approach functioning effectively in real-world practice. Maintaining engagement remains a challenge in weight loss programmes, and our results suggest younger patients living in areas with greater deprivation should be a target for efforts to improve engagement.
© 2017 World Obesity Federation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Obesity; primary care; socioeconomic deprivation; weight Loss

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28871633     DOI: 10.1111/cob.12216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obes        ISSN: 1758-8103


  7 in total

1.  Association of clinically significant weight loss with number of patient visits and months of attendance at an Australian multidisciplinary weight management clinic.

Authors:  Juliana Chen; Harpreet Kaur; Joanna Jaques; Zoe Rock; Catherine M Dean; Reginald V Lord; Veronica Preda
Journal:  Clin Obes       Date:  2022-03-27

2.  Adult weight management across the community: population-level impact of the LOSE IT to WIN IT challenge.

Authors:  J J VanWormer; R F Pereira; A Sillah; A C Sidebottom; G A Benson; R Lindberg; C Winters; J L Boucher
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2018-03-14

3.  A systematic review of UK-based long-term nonsurgical interventions for people with severe obesity (BMI ≥35 kg m-2 ).

Authors:  M Aceves-Martins; C Robertson; D Cooper; A Avenell; F Stewart; P Aveyard; M de Bruin
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.089

4.  Beyond lifestyle interventions: exploring the potential of anti-obesity medications in the UK.

Authors:  J P H Wilding
Journal:  Clin Obes       Date:  2018-04-24

Review 5.  How Group-Based Interventions Can Improve Services for People with Severe Obesity.

Authors:  Dawn Swancutt; Mark Tarrant; Jonathan Pinkney
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2019-09

Review 6.  Developing Integrated Clinical Pathways for the Management of Clinically Severe Adult Obesity: a Critique of NHS England Policy.

Authors:  Jonathan M Hazlehurst; Jennifer Logue; Helen M Parretti; Sally Abbott; Adrian Brown; Dimitri J Pournaras; Abd A Tahrani
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2020-11-12

7.  Design of a randomised controlled trial: does indirect calorimetry energy information influence weight loss in obesity?

Authors:  Jonathan Lim; Uazman Alam; Daniel Cuthbertson; John Wilding
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.