Literature DB >> 28870755

High seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and probability of detecting tissue cysts in backyard laying hens compared with hens from large free-range farms.

G Schares1, B Bangoura2, F Randau2, T Goroll2, M Ludewig3, P Maksimov4, B Matzkeit4, M Sens4, A Bärwald4, F J Conraths4, M Opsteegh5, J Van der Giessen5.   

Abstract

Serological assays are commonly used to determine the prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in livestock, but the predictive value of seropositivity with respect to the presence of infective tissue cysts is less clear. The present study aimed at the identification of seropositive and seronegative free-range laying hens from organic and backyard farms, and the relationship with the presence of viable tissue cysts. In addition, potential risk and protective factors on the selected farms were investigated. An in-house T. gondii surface antigen (TgSAG1, p30, SRS29B) ELISA was validated with sera from experimentally infected chickens and used to examine 470 serum samples collected from laying hens from large organic and small backyard farms at the end of their laying period. A total of 11.7% (55/470) of all chickens tested positive, and another 18.9% (89/470) of test results were inconclusive. The highest seroprevalences were observed on small backyard farms with 47.7% (41/86) of chickens being seropositive while another 20.9% (18/86) of test results were inconclusive. Twenty-nine seropositive, 20 seronegative and 12 laying hens which yielded inconclusive ELISA results, were selected for further examination. Hearts and limb muscles of these hens were examined for T. gondii tissue cysts in a bioassay with IFNɣ-knockout or IFNɣ-receptor-knockout mice. Viable T. gondii was isolated from 75.9% (22/29) of the seropositive, 25.0% (3/12) of the inconclusive, and 5.0% (1/20) of the seronegative chickens. All 26 chickens tested positive in heart samples, while drumstick muscles (i.e. limb muscles) tested positive only in three. Data on putative risk and protective factors were collected on the farms using a standard questionnaire. Generalised multilevel modelling revealed farm size, cat related factors ('cats on the premise', 'cats used for rodent control'), hen house/hall related factors ('size category of hen house/hall', 'frequency category of cleaning hen house/hall', 'service period') as significantly associated with seropositivity to T. gondii in hens. The final model, which included the age of the birds as an effect modifier and farm as a random effect variable, revealed that the use of cats for rodent control and an area available per hen in the chicken run of ≥10sqm were statistically significant risk factors for T. gondii seropositivity. Overall this study showed that exposure to T. gondii is common in small backyard farms but is rare on large organic farms with a high density of free-range hens, even when cats were present on the premises.
Copyright © 2017 Australian Society for Parasitology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioassay; Chicken; ELISA; Multi-level modelling; Risk factors; Serological tools; Toxoplasma gondii

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28870755     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Parasitol        ISSN: 0020-7519            Impact factor:   3.981


  8 in total

1.  Experimental infection with Toxoplasma gondii in broiler chickens (Gallus domesticus): seroconversion, tissue cyst distribution, and prophylaxis.

Authors:  Maria E Nedişan; Adriana Györke; Cristina L Ştefănuţ; Zsuzsa Kalmár; Zsuzsa Friss; Radu Blaga; Amandine Blaizot; Andra Toma-Naic; Viorica Mircean; Gereon Schares; Olgica Djurković-Djaković; Ivana Klun; Isabelle Villena; Vasile Cozma
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  High Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Industrial Tunisian Poultry Meat.

Authors:  Samia Zrelli; Safa Amairia; Moez Mhadhbi; Oussama Briki; Seifeddine Bouallegue; Fatma Souissi; Mohamed Gharbi
Journal:  Acta Parasitol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 1.440

3.  Molecular detection of Toxoplasma gondii in chicken hearts from markets and retail stores in Northern Iran.

Authors:  Somayeh Abbaszadeh; Aref Teimouri; Mohammad Reza Mahmoudi; Zahra Atrkar Roushan; Nayereh Hajipour; Bijan Majidi-Shad; Meysam Sharifdini
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Species-specific differences in Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Besnoitia besnoiti seroprevalence in Namibian wildlife.

Authors:  Anne Seltmann; Gereon Schares; Ortwin H K Aschenborn; Sonja K Heinrich; Susanne Thalwitzer; Bettina Wachter; Gábor Á Czirják
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 5.  Toxoplasma gondii in Foods: Prevalence, Control, and Safety.

Authors:  Pablo-Jesús Marín-García; Nuria Planas; Lola Llobat
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-22

6.  Fluorescent bead-based serological detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection in chickens.

Authors:  Benedikt T Fabian; Fatima Hedar; Martin Koethe; Berit Bangoura; Pavlo Maksimov; Franz J Conraths; Isabelle Villena; Dominique Aubert; Frank Seeber; Gereon Schares
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 7.  Toxoplasma gondii infection and toxoplasmosis in farm animals: Risk factors and economic impact.

Authors:  S Stelzer; W Basso; J Benavides Silván; L M Ortega-Mora; P Maksimov; J Gethmann; F J Conraths; G Schares
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2019-04-03

8.  Prevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii in Retail Fresh Meat Products from Free-range Chickens in Spain.

Authors:  María Jesús Gracia Salinas; Cristina Escolano Campos; María Paz Peris Peris; Nabil Halaihel Kassab
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 1.744

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.