Charleen Hsuan1, Suzanne Ryan-Ibarra2, Kat DeBurgh3, Dawn M Jacobson2. 1. Department of Health Policy and Administration, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: charhsuan@gmail.com. 2. Public Health Institute, Oakland, California. 3. Health Officers Association of California, Sacramento, California.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies suggest an association between paid sick leave (PSL) and better population health, including fewer infectious and nosocomial gastrointestinal disease outbreaks. Yet few studies examine whether laws requiring employers to offer PSL demonstrate a similar association. This mixed-methods study examined whether laws requiring employers to provide PSL are associated with decreased foodborne illness rates, particularly laws that are more supportive of employees taking leave. METHODS: The four earliest PSL laws were classified by whether they were more or less supportive of employees taking leave. Jurisdictions with PSL were matched to comparison jurisdictions by population size and density. Using difference-in-differences, monthly foodborne illness rates (2000-2014) in implementation and comparison jurisdictions before and after the laws were effective were compared, stratifying by how supportive the laws were of employees taking leave, and then by disease. The empirical analysis was conducted from 2015-2017. RESULTS: Foodborne illness rates declined after implementation of the PSL law in jurisdictions with laws more supportive of employees taking leave, but increased in jurisdictions with laws that are less supportive. In adjusted analyses, PSL laws that were more supportive of employees taking sick leave were associated with an adjusted 22% decrease in foodborne illness rates (p=0.005). These results are driven by campylobacteriosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results suggest an association between more supportive PSL laws and decreased foodborne illness rates, they should be interpreted cautiously because the trend is driven by campylobacteriosis, which has low person-to-person transmission.
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies suggest an association between paid sick leave (PSL) and better population health, including fewer infectious and nosocomial gastrointestinal disease outbreaks. Yet few studies examine whether laws requiring employers to offer PSL demonstrate a similar association. This mixed-methods study examined whether laws requiring employers to provide PSL are associated with decreased foodborne illness rates, particularly laws that are more supportive of employees taking leave. METHODS: The four earliest PSL laws were classified by whether they were more or less supportive of employees taking leave. Jurisdictions with PSL were matched to comparison jurisdictions by population size and density. Using difference-in-differences, monthly foodborne illness rates (2000-2014) in implementation and comparison jurisdictions before and after the laws were effective were compared, stratifying by how supportive the laws were of employees taking leave, and then by disease. The empirical analysis was conducted from 2015-2017. RESULTS:Foodborne illness rates declined after implementation of the PSL law in jurisdictions with laws more supportive of employees taking leave, but increased in jurisdictions with laws that are less supportive. In adjusted analyses, PSL laws that were more supportive of employees taking sick leave were associated with an adjusted 22% decrease in foodborne illness rates (p=0.005). These results are driven by campylobacteriosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results suggest an association between more supportive PSL laws and decreased foodborne illness rates, they should be interpreted cautiously because the trend is driven by campylobacteriosis, which has low person-to-person transmission.
Authors: Steven Sumner; Laura Green Brown; Roberta Frick; Carmily Stone; L Rand Carpenter; Lisa Bushnell; Dave Nicholas; James Mack; Henry Blade; Melissa Tobin-D'Angelo; Karen Everstine Journal: J Food Prot Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.077
Authors: Meredith Minkler; Alicia L Salvatore; Charlotte Chang; Megan Gaydos; Shaw San Liu; Pam Tau Lee; Alex Tom; Rajiv Bhatia; Niklas Krause Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: S J Olsen; G R Hansen; L Bartlett; C Fitzgerald; A Sonder; R Manjrekar; T Riggs; J Kim; R Flahart; G Pezzino; D L Swerdlow Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2000-11-14 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Lauren E Lipcsei; Laura G Brown; Erik W Coleman; Adam Kramer; Matthew Masters; Beth C Wittry; Kirsten Reed; Vincent J Radke Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2019-02-22