| Literature DB >> 28870168 |
Totta Ehret1,2, Simone Spork1, Christoph Dieterich3, Richard Lucius1, Emanuel Heitlinger4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Parasites can either respond to differences in immune defenses that exist between individual hosts plastically or, alternatively, follow a genetically canalized ("hard wired") program of infection. Assuming that large-scale functional plasticity would be discernible in the parasite transcriptome we have performed a dual RNA-seq study of the lifecycle of Eimeria falciformis using infected mice with different immune status as models for coccidian infections.Entities:
Keywords: Apicomplexa; Coccidia; Dual RNA-seq; Dual transcriptomics; Parasite lifecycle; Phenotypic plasticity; Transcriptional plasticity
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28870168 PMCID: PMC5584376 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-4095-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Oocyst output and changes in intensity of E. falciformis infection in mouse. Oocyst counts in naïve and challenge infection are shown for three different mouse strains. For infection of naïve NMRI 150 oocysts were used, for challenge infection 1500 oocysts. For C57BL/6 and Rag1 mice 10 oocysts were used in each infection. a Overall output of shed oocysts and (b) shedding kinetics are depicted. c RT-qPCR data of E. falciformis 18S in NMRI mice displays an increase in parasite mRNA over the course of infection. Significantly less parasite 18S transcripts (normalized against host transcripts of house-keeping genes) were detected in challenge infected mice. Formulas and prediction lines are given for linear models. d The percentage of parasite mRNA detected by RNA-seq increases during infection (shown for NMRI). More mRNA is detected in naïve mice compared to challenge infected mice. Sporozoites and oocysts contained ~100% parasite material
Summary of data per sample, sorted according to number of reads mapping to the E. falciformis genome
| Samplea | Sequencing method | Batch | Total reads | Reads mapping mouse | Reads mapping | Percentage | # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMRI_2ndInf_0dpi_rep1 | GAII | 2 | 108,937,797 | 70,489,674 | 247 | 0.0004 | 1 |
| Rag_1stInf_0dpi_rep1 | hiseq | 3 | 25,362,793 | 18,853,850 | 443 | 0.0023 | 2 |
| C57BL/6_1stInf_0dpi_rep1 | hiseq | 3 | 35,731,249 | 25,119,348 | 457 | 0.0018 | 2 |
| C57BL/6_1stInf_0dpi_rep2 | hiseq | 3 | 47,085,959 | 34,377,133 | 608 | 0.0018 | 2 |
| Rag_1stInf_0dpi_rep2 | hiseq | 3 | 46,556,156 | 35,233,327 | 676 | 0.0019 | 2 |
| NMRI_2ndInf_0dpi_rep2 | hiseq | 3 | 58,122,244 | 40,794,245 | 3406 | 0.0083 | 51 |
| NMRI_2ndInf_3dpi_rep1c | hiseq | 3 | 57,934,016 | 40,544,287 | 4803 | 0.0118 | 95 |
| NMRI_2ndInf_5dpi_rep2c | hiseq | 3 | 63,965,539 | 48,289,181 | 10,941 | 0.0227 | 407 |
| NMRI_1stInf_0dpi_rep1c | GAII | 1 | 82,364,585 | 55,176,243 | 17,954 | 0.0325 | 701 |
| NMRI_2ndInf_3dpi_rep2 | hiseq | 3 | 65,548,826 | 46,171,909 | 29,548 | 0.0640 | 1580 |
| NMRI_2ndInf_7dpi_rep2 | hiseq | 3 | 67,487,466 | 51,722,265 | 40,091 | 0.0775 | 1836 |
| Rag_1stInf_5dpi_rep1 | hiseq | 3 | 38,651,359 | 29,982,453 | 63,024 | 0.2098 | 2548 |
| Rag_1stInf_5dpi_rep2 | hiseq | 3 | 34,779,832 | 25,297,803 | 99,000 | 0.3898 | 2828 |
| C57BL/6_1stInf_5dpi_rep1 | hiseq | 3 | 40,904,388 | 29,319,604 | 185,969 | 0.6303 | 4173 |
| Rag_2ndInf_5dpi_rep1 | hiseq | 3 | 50,049,848 | 37,093,621 | 192,856 | 0.5172 | 4167 |
| C57BL/6_1stInf_5dpi_rep2 | hiseq | 3 | 29,511,368 | 18,062,349 | 215,696 | 1.1801 | 3823 |
| C57BL/6_2ndInf_5dpi_rep1 | hiseq | 3 | 35,148,432 | 25,660,184 | 262,909 | 1.0142 | 4563 |
| NMRI_1stInf_3dpi_rep1 | GAII | 1 | 73,236,430 | 49,993,358 | 394,384 | 0.7827 | 5220 |
| NMRI_1stInf_3dpi_rep2 | GAII | 2 | 160,709,694 | 117,791,044 | 413,051 | 0.3494 | 4862 |
| NMRI_1stInf_5dpi_rep2 | GAII | 2 | 119,902,722 | 76,419,774 | 794,570 | 1.0290 | 5333 |
| NMRI_2ndInf_5dpi_rep1 | GAII | 2 | 230,773,955 | 143,186,486 | 1,846,840 | 1.2734 | 5533 |
| NMRI_2ndInf_7dpi_rep1 | hiseq | 3 | 70,366,762 | 41,467,146 | 8,634,201 | 17.2335 | 5875 |
| NMRI_1stInf_5dpi_rep1 | GAII | 2 | 76,702,168 | 47,037,087 | 8,669,701 | 15.5631 | 5700 |
| Sporozoites_rep2 | GAII | 0 | 19,551,681 | 8656 | 11,470,604 | 99.9246 | 5513 |
| NMRI_1stInf_5dpi_rep3 | GAII | 0 | 191,099,180 | 83,735,624 | 27,839,458 | 24.9513 | 5784 |
| NMRI_1stInf_7dpi_rep1 | GAII | 1 | 66,505,514 | 3,310,666 | 39,400,884 | 92.2488 | 5932 |
| Sporozoites_rep1 | GAII | 1 | 67,325,397 | 4334 | 43,774,401 | 99.9901 | 5825 |
| Oocysts_rep1 | GAII | 1 | 68,859,802 | 3805 | 49,653,065 | 99.9923 | 5695 |
| Oocysts_rep2 | GAII | 0 | 151,090,783 | 18,524 | 71,019,860 | 99.9739 | 5777 |
| NMRI_1stInf_7dpi_rep2 | GAII | 1 | 139,749,046 | 21,699,324 | 73,539,445 | 77.2159 | 5943 |
aSample names are given with information separated by underscore as follows: 1) mouse strain, 2) naïve (1st) or challenge (2nd) infection, 3) dpi (days post infection), and 4) replicate number
bNumber of expressed E. falciformis genes (read counts >5)
cThese samples were removed from downstream analyses because of uncertain infection status
Number of mouse and E. falciformis mRNAs significantly differentially abundant in different comparisons (Contrasts)
| Contrast | Number of | Number of mouse mRNAs with FDR < 0.01 |
|---|---|---|
| NMRI 7 dpi vs. uninfected control | 2711 | |
| NMRI 5 dpi vs. uninfected control | 1804 | |
| NMRI 3 dpi vs. NMRI 7 dpi | 1399 | 1322 |
| C57BL/6 5 dpi vs. uninfected control | 919 | |
| NMRI 7 dpi naïve vs NMRI 7 dpi challenge | 0 | 857 |
| NMRI 5 dpi vs. NMRI 7 dpi | 2084 | 732 |
|
| 362 | |
| NMRI 3 dpi vs ctrl | 325 | |
| C57BL/6 5 dpi naïve vs C57BL/6 5 dpi challenge | 0 | 175 |
|
| 42 | |
| NMRI 3 dpi naïve vs NMRI 3 challenge | 1 | 18 |
| NMRI 3 dpi vs. NMRI 5 dpi | 103 | 0 |
| NMRI 5 dpi vs. oocysts | 3691 | |
| Sporozoites vs. oocysts | 3532 | |
| NMRI 3 dpi vs. oocysts | 3303 | |
| NMRI 7 dpi vs. oocysts | 3202 | |
| NMRI 7 dpi vs. sporozoites | 2663 | |
| NMRI 5 dpi vs. sporozoites | 1726 | |
| NMRI 3 dpi vs. sporozoites | 1705 | |
| NMRI control vs. C57BL/6 control | 13 |
Empty cells indicate that comparison is not applicable
Fig. 2Differentially abundant mouse mRNAs and clustering thereof. a Venn diagram visualizes the overlap between genes showing differential abundance (FDR < 0.01; edgeR glm likelihood-ratio tests) between i) uninfected controls and different time-points post infection and ii) between different time-points and the sum of all genes reacting to infection. Controls from challenge infection were used. b Hierarchical clustering of differentially abundant mRNAs performed on Euclidean distances using complete linkage. Cluster cut-offs (dendrogram resolution) were set to identify gene-sets with profiles interpretable in relation to the parasite lifecycle and between mice of different immune competence. Clusters are represented with color on the left-hand side of rows and additional numbering is used to refer to clusters (right)
Fig. 3Correlations of E. falciformis mRNA abundance with ortholgues from other Coccidia. E.falciformis mRNA abundance was compared to that of orthologous genes of E. tenella [45, 46] and T. gondii [47]. Correlation coefficients (Spearman’s ρ) were clustered using complete linkage. T. gondii and Eimeria spp. “late infection” samples cluster together. E. falciformis early infection samples cluster with E. tenella merozoites. E. falciformis sporozoites cluster with E. falciformis early infection, whereas unsporulated oocysts cluster with E. tenella unsporulated oocysts
Fig. 4Differentially abundant E. falciformis mRNAs and clustering thereof. a Venn diagram visualizes the overlap between genes showing differential abundance (FDR < 0.01; edgeR glm likelihood-ratio tests) between intracellular stages at 3 dpi, 5 dpi and 7 dpi. b Hierarchical clustering of abundance profiles for differentially abundant mRNAs performed on Euclidean distances using complete linkage. Cluster cut-offs (dendrogram resolution) were set to identify gene-sets with profiles interpretable in relation to the parasite lifecycle. Clusters are represented with color on the left-hand side of rows and additional numbering is used to refer to clusters (right)
Enrichments and underrepresentation of species or species-group orthologues in E. falciformis gene clusters (from Fig. 3b)
|
| Conservation category | Odds ratio |
| FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ef-cluster 2 (up at 7 dpi) | Conserved | 0.67 | 9.03E-06 | 1.90E-04 |
| Ef-cluster 4 (up in sporozoites) | Conserved | 0.72 | 2.44E-04 | 1.71E-03 |
| Ef-cluster 7 (up at 7 dpi) | Conserved | 1.72 | 1.11E-10 | 4.65E-09 |
| Ef-cluster 2 (up at 7 dpi) | ApicomplexaC | 0.45 | 1.84E-04 | 1.71E-03 |
| Ef-cluster 5 (up in oocysts) | ApicomplexaC | 1.86 | 3.76E-05 | 5.26E-04 |
| Ef-cluster 4 (up in sporozoites) |
| 3.05 | 2.38E-04 | 1.71E-03 |
| Ef-cluster 1 (up in oocysts) |
| 0.68 | 1.83E-03 | 9.59E-03 |
| Ef-cluster 6 (up in early inf) | Apicomplexa | 1.46 | 1.11E-03 | 6.64E-03 |
Odds ratios higher than one indicate enrichment and smaller than one indicate underrepresentation. Conservation categories were chosen as previously described [10]. Only significant results (FDR < 0.05) are shown