| Literature DB >> 28869816 |
Kelly J Norsworthy1, Amy E DeZern1, Hua-Ling Tsai1, Wesley A Hand1, Ravi Varadhan1, Steven D Gore2, Ivana Gojo1, Keith Pratz1, Hetty E Carraway3, Margaret Showel1, Michael A McDevitt4, Douglas Gladstone1, Gabriel Ghiaur1, Gabrielle Prince1, Amy H Seung5, Dina Benani1, Mark J Levis1, Judith E Karp1, B Douglas Smith6.
Abstract
Timed sequential therapy (TST) aims to improve outcomes in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) by harnessing drug-induced cell cycle kinetics of AML, where a second drug is timed to coincide with peak leukemia proliferation induced by the first drugs. We analyzed outcomes in 301 newly diagnosed AML patients treated from 2004-2013 with cytarabine, anthracycline, and etoposide TST induction. Median age was 52 (range 20-74) and complete remission rate 68%. With median follow-up 5.8 years, 5-year DFS and overall survival (OS) were 37% (95% CI 31-45%) and 32% (95% CI 27-38%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, older age, unfavorable cytogenetics, and WBC≥50×109/L resulted in worse OS. Among patients not undergoing blood and marrow transplant, a propensity score analysis, which reduces imbalance in baseline characteristics, showed consolidation with TST compared with 1 or more cycles high-dose cytarabine trended toward lower DFS and post-remission survival with hazard ratio (HR) 1.9 (95% CI 0.9-4.0), and 1.6 (95% CI 0.7-3.6), respectively. Our results demonstrate the efficacy and feasibility of TST induction for newly diagnosed patients with AML, with results comparable to that seen in clinical trials with other TST therapies and 7+3.Entities:
Keywords: Acute myelogenous leukemia; Acute myeloid leukemia; Induction chemotherapy; Timed sequential therapy
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28869816 PMCID: PMC5813685 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.08.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Res ISSN: 0145-2126 Impact factor: 3.156