| Literature DB >> 21690555 |
Xavier Thomas1, Mohamed Elhamri, Emmanuel Raffoux, Aline Renneville, Cécile Pautas, Stéphane de Botton, Thierry de Revel, Oumedaly Reman, Christine Terré, Claude Gardin, Youcef Chelghoum, Nicolas Boissel, Bruno Quesnel, Yosr Hicheri, Jean-Henri Bourhis, Pierre Fenaux, Claude Preudhomme, Mauricette Michallet, Sylvie Castaigne, Hervé Dombret.
Abstract
To assess the value of administering timed-sequential chemotherapy (TSC; 2 therapeutic sequences separated by a 4-day interval-free chemotherapy) or high-dose cytarabine (HDAraC) cycles in consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 459 patients 15 to 50 years of age were enrolled in the prospective randomized Acute Leukemia French Association-9802 trial. Complete remission was achieved in 89%. A total of 237 patients were then randomized to either TSC consolidation (120 patients) or HDAraC consolidation cycles (117 patients). Overall, there was no significant difference between the 2 consolidation arms (5-year event-free survival [EFS]: 41% for HDAraC vs 35% for TSC), or cumulative incidence of relapse, or treatment-related mortality. Cytogenetically normal AML NPM1(+) or CEBPA(+) and FLT3-ITD(-) had the same outcome as those with favorable cytogenetics. When considering favorable and unfavorable risk groups, the trend was in favor of HDAraC. However, the difference became significant when considering intermediate cytogenetics (5-year EFS: 49% vs 29%; P = .02), especially cytogenetically normal AML (5-year EFS: 48% vs 31%; P = .04), which was related to lower relapse rate and less toxicity. This study demonstrates that TSC did not produce any benefit when used as consolidation therapy in younger adults compared with HDAraC. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00880243.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21690555 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-349258
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113