M Kinoshita1,2, Y Matsuda1, T Arai1, Y Soejima2, M Sawabe2, N Honma3. 1. Department of Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Section of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Departments of Pathology, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare histological type of breast cancer. The cytological diagnosis of non-keratinising, poorly differentiated SCC is often difficult, and distinguishing it from invasive ductal carcinoma or apocrine carcinoma (AC) is especially challenging. We aimed to define the diagnostic cytological features of poorly differentiated SCC of the breast. METHODS: We studied the cytological findings of poorly differentiated SCC (n=10) and compared them to those of IDC (n=15) and AC (n=14). The following six cytological features were evaluated: streaming arrangement, nucleolar enlargement, dense nuclei, cannibalism, atypical keratinocytes and necrotic background. RESULTS: SCC exhibited significantly higher frequencies of streaming arrangement (70% vs 6.7%, P=.002), nucleolar enlargement (80% vs 27%, P=.02), and necrotic background (80% vs 36%, P=.002) than invasive ductal carcinoma. The detection of two or three of these features yielded a higher sensitivity (80%) and specificity (93%) for the diagnosis of SCC. Streaming arrangement (70% vs 0%, P<.001), cannibalism (60% vs 0%, P=.002), and a necrotic background (80% vs 36%, P=.047) were all significantly more frequent in SCC than in AC. When distinguishing SCC from AC, the presence of two or three of these features yielded a high sensitivity (80%) and specificity (100%). CONCLUSIONS: Cytological features such as a streaming arrangement, a necrotic background, nucleolar enlargement and cannibalism are useful indicators for the diagnosis of SCC of the breast. As such, greater attention should be paid to these morphological features in daily clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE:Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare histological type of breast cancer. The cytological diagnosis of non-keratinising, poorly differentiated SCC is often difficult, and distinguishing it from invasive ductal carcinoma or apocrine carcinoma (AC) is especially challenging. We aimed to define the diagnostic cytological features of poorly differentiated SCC of the breast. METHODS: We studied the cytological findings of poorly differentiated SCC (n=10) and compared them to those of IDC (n=15) and AC (n=14). The following six cytological features were evaluated: streaming arrangement, nucleolar enlargement, dense nuclei, cannibalism, atypical keratinocytes and necrotic background. RESULTS:SCC exhibited significantly higher frequencies of streaming arrangement (70% vs 6.7%, P=.002), nucleolar enlargement (80% vs 27%, P=.02), and necrotic background (80% vs 36%, P=.002) than invasive ductal carcinoma. The detection of two or three of these features yielded a higher sensitivity (80%) and specificity (93%) for the diagnosis of SCC. Streaming arrangement (70% vs 0%, P<.001), cannibalism (60% vs 0%, P=.002), and a necrotic background (80% vs 36%, P=.047) were all significantly more frequent in SCC than in AC. When distinguishing SCC from AC, the presence of two or three of these features yielded a high sensitivity (80%) and specificity (100%). CONCLUSIONS: Cytological features such as a streaming arrangement, a necrotic background, nucleolar enlargement and cannibalism are useful indicators for the diagnosis of SCC of the breast. As such, greater attention should be paid to these morphological features in daily clinical practice.
Authors: Marc Combalia; Sergio Garcia; Josep Malvehy; Susana Puig; Alba Guembe Mülberger; James Browning; Sandra Garcet; James G Krueger; Samantha R Lish; Rivka Lax; Jeannie Ren; Mary Stevenson; Nicole Doudican; John A Carucci; Manu Jain; Kevin White; Jaroslav Rakos; Daniel S Gareau Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 3.562
Authors: Xinlong Wang; Yilong Li; Jiating Li; Le Li; Hong Zhu; Hua Chen; Rui Kong; Gang Wang; Yongwei Wang; Jisheng Hu; Bei Sun Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2019-12-03
Authors: Alhadi Almangush; Antti A Mäkitie; Jaana Hagström; Caj Haglund; Luiz Paulo Kowalski; Pentti Nieminen; Ricardo D Coletta; Tuula Salo; Ilmo Leivo Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Celia López-Menéndez; Alberto Vázquez-Naharro; Vanesa Santos; Pierre Dubus; Patricia G Santamaría; Ángel Martínez-Ramírez; Francisco Portillo; Gema Moreno-Bueno; Marisa M Faraldo; Amparo Cano Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 12.701