Literature DB >> 28868343

Disentangling PTEN-cooperating tumor suppressor gene networks in cancer.

Jorge de la Rosa1,2,3, Julia Weber4,5, Roland Rad1,4,5, Allan Bradley1, Juan Cadiñanos1,2.   

Abstract

We have recently performed a whole-body, genome-wide screen in mice using a single-copy inactivating transposon for the identification of Pten (phosphatase and tensin homolog)-cooperating tumor suppressor genes (TSGs). We identified known and putative TSGs in multiple cancer types and validated the functional and clinical relevance of several promising candidates for human prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AKAP13; CELF2; PARD3; PTEN; Sleeping Beauty; WAC; ZBTB20; prostate cancer; transposon; tumor suppressor gene

Year:  2017        PMID: 28868343      PMCID: PMC5540202          DOI: 10.1080/23723556.2017.1325550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol        ISSN: 2372-3556


Cancer originates and evolves through the gradual accumulation of genetic/epigenetic alterations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (TSGs). The PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) gene is the second most frequently mutated/deleted TSG in human cancer, only after TP53 (tumor protein p53). As the main antagonist of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT serine/threonine kinase 1 (AKT) oncogenic pathway and a key maintainer of genomic stability, PTEN controls a plethora of cellular processes including metabolism, cell growth, proliferation, and survival. Although subtle changes in PTEN levels can lead to tumor initiation, lower levels of this protein are linked to more advanced disease, and accompanying mutations in other genes are required for full malignancy. Identifying these PTEN-cooperating TSG networks is a major goal for the understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in cancer progression and the design of combinatorial therapies to treat PTEN-deficient cancers. Insertional mutagenesis screens complement human genome sequencing-based approaches for elucidating the genetic forces driving cancer progression. By coupling Pten-disruption to mobilization of a Sleeping Beauty inactivating transposon within each cell, we have recently performed a novel genome-wide survey for Pten-cooperating TSGs in mice. The transposon, targeted to the Pten locus, carries a critical exon of this gene when it is mobilized, leading to Pten inactivation and subsequent generation of an additional mutation when randomly reinserted into the genome (Fig. 1). Moreover, increased transposon mutation rate was achieved in a subset of mice by introducing a transgene with additional copies of an inactivating transposon. Based on this innovation, we have identified sets of hundreds of known and novel cancer genes involved in prostate, breast, and skin cancer, all of them predicted to behave as TSGs. We then focused on prostate cancer, for which PTEN relevance is well documented, and validated the implication of several of the genes identified for the progression of the disease in humans.
Figure 1.

Transposon-based screen for identifying Pten-cooperating tumor suppressors in cancer. Mice carry a Pten allele where the exon 5 (encoding the phosphatase domain) is flanked by the terminal repeats (TRs) of the Sleeping Beauty transposon (top left). This allele functions normally, but it becomes inactivated upon mobilization of the transposon, which subsequently can be reinserted elsewhere in the genome, potentially generating an additional loss-of-function mutation (top middle). Loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) can lead to inactivation of the second Pten allele and/or of the additional, Pten-cooperating, mutations (top right). Sequencing and mapping of transposon insertion sites allow identification of targeted genes. Final cancer gene lists are generated with those loci hit by transposition significantly more often than predicted by chance across several tumors. Genes of interest can then be selected for further functional and clinical validation (bottom). TSG, tumor suppressor gene; wt, wild-type; ht, heterozygous; ko, knockout; Pten, phosphatase and tensin homolog; ZBTB20, zinc finger and BTB domain-containing 20; CELF2, CUGBP, Elav-like family member 2; AKAP13, A-kinase anchor protein 13; PARD3, Par-3 family cell polarity regulator; WAC, WW domain-containing adaptor with coiled coil.

Transposon-based screen for identifying Pten-cooperating tumor suppressors in cancer. Mice carry a Pten allele where the exon 5 (encoding the phosphatase domain) is flanked by the terminal repeats (TRs) of the Sleeping Beauty transposon (top left). This allele functions normally, but it becomes inactivated upon mobilization of the transposon, which subsequently can be reinserted elsewhere in the genome, potentially generating an additional loss-of-function mutation (top middle). Loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) can lead to inactivation of the second Pten allele and/or of the additional, Pten-cooperating, mutations (top right). Sequencing and mapping of transposon insertion sites allow identification of targeted genes. Final cancer gene lists are generated with those loci hit by transposition significantly more often than predicted by chance across several tumors. Genes of interest can then be selected for further functional and clinical validation (bottom). TSG, tumor suppressor gene; wt, wild-type; ht, heterozygous; ko, knockout; Pten, phosphatase and tensin homolog; ZBTB20, zinc finger and BTB domain-containing 20; CELF2, CUGBP, Elav-like family member 2; AKAP13, A-kinase anchor protein 13; PARD3, Par-3 family cell polarity regulator; WAC, WW domain-containing adaptor with coiled coil. Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the second leading cause of male cancer deaths in the Western world. Nearly 50% of primary and almost 100% of metastatic prostate tumors have genetic alterations in the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, mostly through loss of PTEN. However, while some of these tumors progress slowly, others rapidly spread beyond the site of origin and metastasize, implying that genetic alterations beyond this pathway may account for such different behaviors. Finding genetic markers able to distinguish indolent from aggressive disease represents one of the current unmet challenges. Transposon integration analysis on 127 prostate tumors led us to the identification of over a hundred genes potentially associated to cancer progression. Cross-comparison with human cancer data sets supported the relevance of these genes for PTEN-cooperating human prostate tumor suppression as they are significantly enriched in (1) known and putative human cancer genes, (2) genes whose mRNA expression levels decline concomitantly with those of PTEN in human prostate cancer samples, and (3) genes frequently inactivated by homozygous deletion in human prostate cancer. Among them, those encoding chromatin/histone modifiers and involved in RNA metabolic processes (RNA stability, splicing, and transcriptional regulation) are strongly overrepresented, followed by those implicated in ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis (mainly E3 ligases). Interestingly, some of these genes have been described previously to be altered in human prostate cancer through different mechanisms, including mutation (ARID1A, KDM6A, MLL1, MLL5, and MAGI3), copy-number variation (ETV6 and FOXP1), gene fusion (TBL1XR1, FUBP1, and EPB41), transcriptional dysregulation (MEIS1 and PBX1), or single nucleotide polymorphism (RASA1). This shows the potential of transposon mutagenesis screens to identify a diversity of cancer genes that otherwise require multiple methodological approaches to be pinpointed. Moreover, for several of these genes, our results represent the first piece of biologic evidence for their tumor suppressive role in prostate cancer. We selected 5 of these genes, ranking among the top 20 most frequently hit by transposition, for further validation. These genes encode the transcription factor ZBTB20 (zinc finger and BTB domain-containing 20), the RNA-binding factor CELF2 (CUGBP, Elav-like family member 2), the controller of cell polarity PARD3 (Par-3 family cell polarity regulator), the scaffold protein AKAP13 (A-kinase anchor protein 13), and the autophagy regulator WAC (WW domain-containing adaptor with coiled coil). We showed that co-silencing the expression of PTEN and each of these five genes increased the invasive potential of two immortalized but nontransformed human prostate cell lines. Moreover, the analysis of their transcriptomic profiling upon co-silencing conditions revealed rewiring of known oncogenic pathways important for prostate cancer progression. Additionally, we found that each one of these genes is co-downregulated with PTEN in primary and metastatic samples, and that patients with tumors expressing low levels of them have worse prognoses, with shorter times to recurrence. Finally, the generation of mice with prostate-specific heterozygous or homozygous deletion of Wac in aPten-deficient background demonstrated that the function of Wac in cancer is gene-dose-dependent, as its partial inactivation promotes cancer, but its complete loss constrains tumor growth. Although downstream analyses are needed to clarify this phenomenon of obligate haploinsufficiency, Wac-mediated regulatory mechanisms of autophagy might be the underlying cause, as autophagy has been shown to exert opposite roles in cancer, depending on the tissue context and its intensity. Altogether, the genes identified through this screen could not only be used as markers for prognosis and staging purposes, but they may also inspire new anticancer therapies. Globally, the new mouse model developed in our study provides a very useful tool to disentangle the crosstalk mechanisms between PTEN, a key signaling node in cancer, and previously unknown TSG networks. Thus, cross-comparing the catalog of genes compiled in this screen with previous lists of genes generated through next-generation sequencing of human cancer genomes helps pinpoint the actual drivers of cancer progression, which can be then pursued for downstream analysis.
  10 in total

Review 1.  The functions and regulation of the PTEN tumour suppressor.

Authors:  Min Sup Song; Leonardo Salmena; Pier Paolo Pandolfi
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer.

Authors:  Barry S Taylor; Nikolaus Schultz; Haley Hieronymus; Anuradha Gopalan; Yonghong Xiao; Brett S Carver; Vivek K Arora; Poorvi Kaushik; Ethan Cerami; Boris Reva; Yevgeniy Antipin; Nicholas Mitsiades; Thomas Landers; Igor Dolgalev; John E Major; Manda Wilson; Nicholas D Socci; Alex E Lash; Adriana Heguy; James A Eastham; Howard I Scher; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Chris Sander; Charles L Sawyers; William L Gerald
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 3.  Prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gerhardt Attard; Chris Parker; Ros A Eeles; Fritz Schröder; Scott A Tomlins; Ian Tannock; Charles G Drake; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Subtle variations in Pten dose determine cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Andrea Alimonti; Arkaitz Carracedo; John G Clohessy; Lloyd C Trotman; Caterina Nardella; Ainara Egia; Leonardo Salmena; Katia Sampieri; William J Haveman; Edi Brogi; Andrea L Richardson; Jiangwen Zhang; Pier Paolo Pandolfi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  Autophagy in malignant transformation and cancer progression.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Federico Pietrocola; José Manuel Bravo-San Pedro; Ravi K Amaravadi; Eric H Baehrecke; Francesco Cecconi; Patrice Codogno; Jayanta Debnath; David A Gewirtz; Vassiliki Karantza; Alec Kimmelman; Sharad Kumar; Beth Levine; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Seamus J Martin; Josef Penninger; Mauro Piacentini; David C Rubinsztein; Hans-Uwe Simon; Anne Simonsen; Andrew M Thorburn; Guillermo Velasco; Kevin M Ryan; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  PiggyBac transposon mutagenesis: a tool for cancer gene discovery in mice.

Authors:  Roland Rad; Lena Rad; Wei Wang; Juan Cadinanos; George Vassiliou; Stephen Rice; Lia S Campos; Kosuke Yusa; Ruby Banerjee; Meng Amy Li; Jorge de la Rosa; Alexander Strong; Dong Lu; Peter Ellis; Nathalie Conte; Fang Tang Yang; Pentao Liu; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Drug discovery in advanced prostate cancer: translating biology into therapy.

Authors:  Timothy A Yap; Alan D Smith; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Bissan Al-Lazikani; Paul Workman; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  The mutational landscape of lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Catherine S Grasso; Yi-Mi Wu; Dan R Robinson; Xuhong Cao; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Amjad P Khan; Michael J Quist; Xiaojun Jing; Robert J Lonigro; J Chad Brenner; Irfan A Asangani; Bushra Ateeq; Sang Y Chun; Javed Siddiqui; Lee Sam; Matt Anstett; Rohit Mehra; John R Prensner; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Gregory A Ryslik; Fabio Vandin; Benjamin J Raphael; Lakshmi P Kunju; Daniel R Rhodes; Kenneth J Pienta; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Scott A Tomlins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  The utility of transposon mutagenesis for cancer studies in the era of genome editing.

Authors:  Gina M DeNicola; Florian A Karreth; David J Adams; Chi C Wong
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  A single-copy Sleeping Beauty transposon mutagenesis screen identifies new PTEN-cooperating tumor suppressor genes.

Authors:  Jorge de la Rosa; Julia Weber; Mathias Josef Friedrich; Yilong Li; Lena Rad; Hannes Ponstingl; Qi Liang; Sandra Bernaldo de Quirós; Imran Noorani; Emmanouil Metzakopian; Alexander Strong; Meng Amy Li; Aurora Astudillo; María Teresa Fernández-García; María Soledad Fernández-García; Gary J Hoffman; Rocío Fuente; George S Vassiliou; Roland Rad; Carlos López-Otín; Allan Bradley; Juan Cadiñanos
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 38.330

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  An in vivo Like Micro-Carcinoma Model.

Authors:  Sandra Camargo; Yulia Shamis; Assaf Assis; Eduardo Mitrani
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 2.  CRISPR and transposon in vivo screens for cancer drivers and therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Imran Noorani; Allan Bradley; Jorge de la Rosa
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 13.583

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.