| Literature DB >> 28868036 |
Ping Cheng1, Tong Wang1, Wei Li1, Ishfaq Muhammad1, He Wang1, Xiaoqi Sun1, Yuqi Yang1, Jiarui Li1, Tianshi Xiao1, Xiuying Zhang1.
Abstract
As a kind of potent stimulus, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has the ability to cause cell damage by activating toll-like receptor(TLR)4, then nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) translocates into the nucleus and changes the expression of related inflammatory genes. Baicalin is extracted from Radix Scutellariae, which possesses anti-inflammation, antioxidant and antibacterial properties. However, the effects of it on LPS-induced liver inflammation have not been fully elucidated. This study aims to investigate the anti-inflammatory effects of Baicalin on the LPS-induced liver inflammation and its underlying molecular mechanisms in chicken. The results of histopathological changes, serum biochemical analysis, NO levels and myeloperoxidase activity showed that Baicalin pretreatment ameliorated LPS-induced liver inflammation. ELISA and qPCR assays showed that Baicalin dose-dependently suppressed the production of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. Furthermore, the mRNA expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) were significantly decreased by Baicalin. TLR4 is an important sensor in LPS infection. Molecular studies showed that the expression of TLR4 was inhibited by Baicalin pretreatment. In addition, Baicalin pretreatment inhibited NF-kB signaling pathway activation. All results demonstrated the protective effects of Baicalin pretreatment against LPS-induced liver inflammation in chicken via negative regulation of inflammatory mediators through the down-regulation of TLR4 expression and the inhibition of NF-kB activation.Entities:
Keywords: Baicalin; NF-κB; TLR4; anti-inflammation; lipopolysaccharide; liver inflammation
Year: 2017 PMID: 28868036 PMCID: PMC5563358 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00547
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Primers used for the quantitative real-time PCR.
| IL-1β | F: 5′-ACT GGG CAT CAA GGG CTA CA-3′ | 142 | |
| R: 5′-GCT GTC CAG GCG GTA GAA GA-3′ | |||
| IL-6 | F: 5′-AAA TCC CTC CTC GCC AAT CT-3′ | 106 | |
| R: 5′-CCC TCA CGG TCT TCT CCA TAA A-3′ | |||
| TNF-α | F: 5′-GCCCTTCCTGTAACCAGATG-3′ | 171 | |
| R: 5′-ACACGACAGCCAAGTCAACG-3′ | |||
| TLR4 | F: 5′-ATC TTT CAA GGT GCC ACA TC-3′ | 167 | |
| R: 5′-GGA TAT GCT TGT TTC CAC CA-3′ | |||
| iNOS | F: 5′-CCT GGA GGT CCT GGA AGA GT-3′ | 82 | |
| R: 5'-CCT GGG TTT CAG AAG TGG C-3′ | |||
| COX-2 | F: 5′-TGT CCT TTC ACT GCT TTC CAT-3′ | 84 | |
| R: 5′-TTC CAT TGC TGT GTT TGA GGT-3′ | |||
| β-actin | F: 5′-TGCGTGACATCAAGGAGAAG-3′ | 135 | |
| R: 5′-TGCCAGGGTACATTGTGGTA-3′ |
Figure 1Effects of Baicalin on LPS-induced cloacal temperature. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. (n = 10). *P < 0.05 vs. LPS group; #P < 0.05 vs. control group.
Figure 2Baicalin pretreatment alleviated LPS-induced liver inflammation. Effects of Baicalin on LPS-induced serum AST (A) and ALT (B) levels. Histopathological changes in liver after LPS stimulation (HE, ×100). (C) control group, (D) LPS group, (E–G) Baicalin (50, 100, 200 mg/kg BW)+LPS groups. And effects of Baicalin on LPS-induced MPO activity in liver (H). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. (n = 10). *P < 0.05 vs. LPS group; #P < 0.05 vs. control group.
Figure 3Effects of Baicalin on LPS-induced NO levels (A) and iNOS (B) and COX-2 mRNA expression (C) in liver. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. (n = 10). *P < 0.05 vs. LPS group; #P < 0.05 vs. control group.
Figure 4Effects of Baicalin on the production of cytokines. (A–C) The expression of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 proteins induced by LPS. (D–F) The expression of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 mRNA induced by LPS. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 10). *P < 0.05 vs. LPS group; #P < 0.05 vs. control group.
Figure 5Effects of Baicalin on TLR4 expression. TLR4 mRNA levels (A), TLR4 protein levels (B). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 10). *P < 0.05 vs. LPS group; #P < 0.05 vs. control group.
Figure 6Baicalin inhibited NF-κB pathway activation. The expression of p-IkBα (A), p-p65 (B), and nuclear p65 (C). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. (n = 6). *P < 0.05 vs. LPS group; #P < 0.05 vs. control group.