Literature DB >> 28867342

Thresholds of Toxicological Concern for cosmetics-related substances: New database, thresholds, and enrichment of chemical space.

Chihae Yang1, Susan M Barlow2, Kristi L Muldoon Jacobs3, Vessela Vitcheva4, Alan R Boobis5, Susan P Felter6, Kirk B Arvidson3, Detlef Keller7, Mark T D Cronin8, Steven Enoch8, Andrew Worth9, Heli M Hollnagel10.   

Abstract

A new dataset of cosmetics-related chemicals for the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach has been compiled, comprising 552 chemicals with 219, 40, and 293 chemicals in Cramer Classes I, II, and III, respectively. Data were integrated and curated to create a database of No-/Lowest-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level (NOAEL/LOAEL) values, from which the final COSMOS TTC dataset was developed. Criteria for study inclusion and NOAEL decisions were defined, and rigorous quality control was performed for study details and assignment of Cramer classes. From the final COSMOS TTC dataset, human exposure thresholds of 42 and 7.9 μg/kg-bw/day were derived for Cramer Classes I and III, respectively. The size of Cramer Class II was insufficient for derivation of a TTC value. The COSMOS TTC dataset was then federated with the dataset of Munro and colleagues, previously published in 1996, after updating the latter using the quality control processes for this project. This federated dataset expands the chemical space and provides more robust thresholds. The 966 substances in the federated database comprise 245, 49 and 672 chemicals in Cramer Classes I, II and III, respectively. The corresponding TTC values of 46, 6.2 and 2.3 μg/kg-bw/day are broadly similar to those of the original Munro dataset.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cheminformatics; Cosmetics; Cramer classification; TTC; Threshold of Toxicological Concern

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28867342     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  16 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in working towards an internal threshold of toxicological concern (iTTC) for use in the safety assessment of cosmetics: Discussions from the Cosmetics Europe iTTC Working Group workshop.

Authors:  Corie A Ellison; Karen L Blackburn; Paul L Carmichael; Harvey J Clewell; Mark T D Cronin; Bertrand Desprez; Sylvia E Escher; Steve S Ferguson; Sébastien Grégoire; Nicola J Hewitt; Heli M Hollnagel; Martina Klaric; Atish Patel; Sabrina Salhi; Andreas Schepky; Barbara G Schmitt; John F Wambaugh; Andrew Worth
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Practical application of the interim internal threshold of toxicological concern (iTTC): a case study based on clinical data.

Authors:  Abdulkarim Najjar; Corie A Ellison; Sebastien Gregoire; Nicola J Hewitt
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.168

3.  Monte Carlo Models for Sub-Chronic Repeated-Dose Toxicity: Systemic and Organ-Specific Toxicity.

Authors:  Gianluca Selvestrel; Giovanna J Lavado; Alla P Toropova; Andrey A Toropov; Domenico Gadaleta; Marco Marzo; Diego Baderna; Emilio Benfenati
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 4.  In Silico Prediction of Organ Level Toxicity: Linking Chemistry to Adverse Effects.

Authors:  Mark T D Cronin; Steven J Enoch; Claire L Mellor; Katarzyna R Przybylak; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Judith C Madden
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2017-07-15

5.  A Next-Generation Risk Assessment Case Study for Coumarin in Cosmetic Products.

Authors:  Maria T Baltazar; Sophie Cable; Paul L Carmichael; Richard Cubberley; Tom Cull; Mona Delagrange; Matthew P Dent; Sarah Hatherell; Jade Houghton; Predrag Kukic; Hequn Li; Mi-Young Lee; Sophie Malcomber; Alistair M Middleton; Thomas E Moxon; Alexis V Nathanail; Beate Nicol; Ruth Pendlington; Georgia Reynolds; Joe Reynolds; Andrew White; Carl Westmoreland
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Application of new statistical distribution approaches for environmental mixture risk assessment: A case study.

Authors:  Aude Kienzler; Stephanie Bopp; Marlies Halder; Michelle Embry; Andrew Worth
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-07-21       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Ab initio chemical safety assessment: A workflow based on exposure considerations and non-animal methods.

Authors:  Elisabet Berggren; Andrew White; Gladys Ouedraogo; Alicia Paini; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Frederic Y Bois; Thomas Exner; Sofia Leite; Leo A van Grunsven; Andrew Worth; Catherine Mahony
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2017-11

8.  Identifying and Characterizing Stress Pathways of Concern for Consumer Safety in Next-Generation Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Sarah Hatherell; Maria T Baltazar; Joe Reynolds; Paul L Carmichael; Matthew Dent; Hequn Li; Stephanie Ryder; Andrew White; Paul Walker; Alistair M Middleton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Application of Switchable Hydrophobicity Solvents for Extraction of Emerging Contaminants in Wastewater Samples.

Authors:  Guillermo Lasarte-Aragonés; Alejandro Álvarez-Lueje; Ricardo Salazar; Carla Toledo-Neira
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Defining the Human-Biota Thresholds of Toxicological Concern for Organic Chemicals in Freshwater: The Proposed Strategy of the LIFE VERMEER Project Using VEGA Tools.

Authors:  Diego Baderna; Roberta Faoro; Gianluca Selvestrel; Adrien Troise; Davide Luciani; Sandrine Andres; Emilio Benfenati
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.