Literature DB >> 28866504

Data Visualization Saliency Model: A Tool for Evaluating Abstract Data Visualizations.

Laura E Matzen, Michael J Haass, Kristin M Divis, Zhiyuan Wang, Andrew T Wilson.   

Abstract

Evaluating the effectiveness of data visualizations is a challenging undertaking and often relies on one-off studies that test a visualization in the context of one specific task. Researchers across the fields of data science, visualization, and human-computer interaction are calling for foundational tools and principles that could be applied to assessing the effectiveness of data visualizations in a more rapid and generalizable manner. One possibility for such a tool is a model of visual saliency for data visualizations. Visual saliency models are typically based on the properties of the human visual cortex and predict which areas of a scene have visual features (e.g. color, luminance, edges) that are likely to draw a viewer's attention. While these models can accurately predict where viewers will look in a natural scene, they typically do not perform well for abstract data visualizations. In this paper, we discuss the reasons for the poor performance of existing saliency models when applied to data visualizations. We introduce the Data Visualization Saliency (DVS) model, a saliency model tailored to address some of these weaknesses, and we test the performance of the DVS model and existing saliency models by comparing the saliency maps produced by the models to eye tracking data obtained from human viewers. Finally, we describe how modified saliency models could be used as general tools for assessing the effectiveness of visualizations, including the strengths and weaknesses of this approach.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28866504     DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2743939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph        ISSN: 1077-2626            Impact factor:   4.579


  3 in total

1.  VIStory: interactive storyboard for exploring visual information in scientific publications.

Authors:  Wei Zeng; Ao Dong; Xi Chen; Zhang-Lin Cheng
Journal:  J Vis (Tokyo)       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 1.974

2.  Which emphasis technique to use? Perception of emphasis techniques with varying distractors, backgrounds, and visualization types.

Authors:  Aristides Mairena; Carl Gutwin; Andy Cockburn
Journal:  Inf Vis       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 0.956

3.  Heat map visualization for electrocardiogram data analysis.

Authors:  Haisen Guo; Weidai Zhang; Chumin Ni; Zhixiong Cai; Songming Chen; Xiansheng Huang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.298

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.