Literature DB >> 28866341

Similar 30-Day Complications for Septic Knee Arthritis Treated With Arthrotomy or Arthroscopy: An American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.

Patawut Bovonratwet1, Stephen J Nelson1, Kirthi Bellamkonda1, Nathaniel T Ondeck1, Blake N Shultz1, Michael J Medvecky1, Jonathan N Grauer2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to use the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to determine whether there were differences in 30-day perioperative complications between open arthrotomy and arthroscopy for the treatment of septic knees in a large national sample.
METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with a septic knee and underwent open arthrotomy or arthroscopy were identified in the 2005-2014 NSQIP data sets. Patient demographics and perioperative complications were characterized and compared between the 2 procedures.
RESULTS: In total, 168 patients undergoing knee arthrotomy and 216 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy for septic knee were identified. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic variables between the 2 groups. On univariate analysis, the rate of minor adverse events (MAEs; 15.48% vs 8.80%, P = .043) was higher in the open arthrotomy treatment group, while the rate of serious adverse events (SAEs; 37.50% vs 26.19%, P = .019) was higher in the arthroscopic surgery treatment group. On multivariate analysis, which controlled for patient characteristics/comorbidities and used the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, there were no statistically significant differences in risk of any adverse events (relative risk [RR] = 0.851; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.598-1.211; P = .240), MAE (RR = 1.653; 99% CI, 0.818-3.341; P = .066), SAE (RR = 0.706; 99% CI, 0.471-1.058; P = .027), return to the operating room (RR = 0.810; 99% CI, 0.433-1.516; P = .387), or readmission (RR = 1.022; 99% CI, 0.456-2.294; P = .944) between open compared with arthroscopic surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Univariate analysis revealed a lower rate of MAE but a higher rate of SAE in the arthroscopic surgery treatment group. However, on multivariate analysis, similar perioperative complications, rate of return to the operating room, and rate of readmission were found after open and arthroscopic debridement for septic knees. Based on the lack of demonstrated superiority of either of these 2 treatment modalities for this given diagnosis, and the expectation that most differences in perioperative complications for this diagnosis would have declared themselves within the first 30 days, deciding between the studied treatment modalities may be based more on other factors not included in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level III.
Copyright © 2017 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28866341     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  8 in total

1.  Arthroscopic Treatment Yields Lower Reoperation Rates than Open Treatment for Native Knee but Not Native Shoulder Septic Arthritis.

Authors:  Ajay S Padaki; Gabrielle C Ma; Nicole M Truong; Charles J Cogan; Drew A Lansdown; Brian T Feeley; C Benjamin Ma; Alan L Zhang
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Management of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Analysis of a Questionnaire Study, Correlation With a National Sample, and Perioperative Outcomes of Treatment Options.

Authors:  Patawut Bovonratwet; Matthew L Webb; Nathaniel T Ondeck; Jonathan J Cui; Ryan P McLynn; Praveen Kadimcherla; David H Kim; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-04-30

3.  Repeat irrigation & debridement for patients with acute septic knee arthritis: Incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Seth Stake; Ryan Scully; Samuel Swenson; Danny Lee; Ryan Lee; Andrew Sparks; Rajeev Pandarinath
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-13

4.  Arthroscopy versus arthrotomy for the treatment of septic knee arthritis.

Authors:  Daniel J Johnson; Bennet A Butler; Matthew J Hartwell; Claire E Fernandez; Richard W Nicolay; Ryan S Selley; Michael A Terry; Vehniah K Tjong
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-27

5.  Similar Efficacy of Arthroscopy and Arthrotomy in Infection Eradication in the Treatment of Septic Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhimin Liang; Xiaofan Deng; Lingli Li; Jing Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-13

6.  Clinical Efficacy of the Antibiotic-Loaded Collagen Sponge During Arthroscopic Treatment of Acute Septic Arthritis of the Native Knee.

Authors:  Kook-Jong Kim; Ho-Seung Jeong; Byung-Hyun Ahn; Dong-Min Chung
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-04-04

7.  Risk factors for septic arthritis and multiple arthroscopic washouts: minimum 2-year follow-up at a major trauma centre.

Authors:  Victor Lu; Andrew Zhou; Hassan Abbas Hussain; Azeem Thahir; Matija Krkovic
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Inadvertent Debridement of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery for Infection: A Case Report.

Authors:  Gunjar Jain; Hira Lal Nag; Amit Roy
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2021-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.