Literature DB >> 28865964

Routine cultures for seemingly aseptic revision shoulder arthroplasty: are they necessary?

Tyler J Brolin1, Daniel J Hackett2, Joseph A Abboud1, Jason E Hsu2, Surena Namdari3.   

Abstract

Propionibacterium acnes has recently gained attention as the leading cause of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after shoulder arthroplasty. Unlike PJIs in the lower extremity, PJIs after shoulder arthroplasty usually have an indolent course and are notoriously difficult to diagnose. Most of the time, the diagnosis is made after positive intraoperative cultures are taken at the time of revision surgery. Adding even more complexity to the diagnosis is the high rate of P acnes-positive cultures taken at the time of primary shoulder surgery. In many cases the preoperative workup yields no suspicion for infection; however, intraoperative cultures are taken to completely eliminate the potential of an ongoing indolent infection. Concerns over how to interpret positive P acnes culture results and the high rate of culture positivity in primary shoulder arthroplasty, as well as the potentially high rate of contamination, have led surgeons to wonder about the utility of obtaining intraoperative cultures at the time of revision shoulder arthroplasty. We present evidence for and against the practice of obtaining routine intraoperative cultures at the time of seemingly aseptic revision shoulder arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Propionibacterium acnes; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; intraoperative cultures; periprosthetic joint infections; revision shoulder arthroplasty; total shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28865964     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

1.  Sonication of removed implants improves microbiological diagnosis of postoperative spinal infections.

Authors:  Justus Bürger; Doruk Akgün; Patrick Strube; Michael Putzier; Matthias Pumberger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  The lexicon for periprosthetic bone loss versus osteolysis after cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jenna M Wahbeh; Sang-Hyun Park; Patricia Campbell; Edward Ebramzadeh; Sophia N Sangiorgio
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  High rate of unexpected positive cultures in presumed aseptic revision of stiff shoulders after proximal humerus osteosynthesis.

Authors:  Doruk Akgün; Paulina-Maria Peters; Nina Maziak; Fabian Plachel; Marvin Minkus; Philipp Moroder
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Incidence and predictors of positive intraoperative cultures in primary shoulder arthroplasty following prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Stephen Gates; Ivy Nguyen; Michael Del Core; Paul A Nakonezny; Hallie Bradley; Michael Khazzam
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-02-21

5.  Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of povidone-iodine-alcohol versus chlorhexidine-alcohol for surgical skin preparation on the aerobic and anaerobic skin flora of the shoulder region.

Authors:  Dorothea Dörfel; Matthias Maiwald; Georg Daeschlein; Gerald Müller; Robert Hudek; Ojan Assadian; Günter Kampf; Thomas Kohlmann; Julian Camill Harnoss; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.887

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.