PURPOSE: In total joint replacement, culturing of the sonication fluid of removed implants has proven to be more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic tissue culture for the microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. However, its role in postoperative spinal implant infection (PSII) is not well investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the validity of sonication in detecting infection following instrumented spine surgery. METHODS: In this prospective controlled consecutive cohort study, patients undergoing spinal revision between September 2016 and March 2018 were analyzed. In all patients sonication of removed spinal implants and at least one peri-implant tissue culture were performed. Demographic data, including age, gender, clinical manifestation, comorbidities, laboratory values (CRP and blood leukocytes), were recorded. Microorganisms causing PSII were documented. Sensitivity and specificity of sonication and peri-implant tissue culture were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were included. PSII was diagnosed in 35 patients, representing 29.6% of the study cohort. Sensitivities of tissue and sonication fluid culture were 65.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 48.6-80.0) and 94.3% (95% CI 85.7-100) (p value = 0.002) and specificities 96.4% (95% CI 91.6-100) and 98.8% (95% CI 96.4-100), respectively. The most common microorganisms found in PSII were coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Propionibacterium acnes. Eleven PSIIs were detected only by sonicate fluid culture. CONCLUSIONS: Culture of samples obtained by spinal implant sonication was more sensitive than conventional peri-implant tissue culture for the microbiological diagnosis of PSII. Therefore, sonication should be used as a routine tool in the diagnostic workup of PSII. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
PURPOSE: In total joint replacement, culturing of the sonication fluid of removed implants has proven to be more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic tissue culture for the microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. However, its role in postoperative spinal implant infection (PSII) is not well investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the validity of sonication in detecting infection following instrumented spine surgery. METHODS: In this prospective controlled consecutive cohort study, patients undergoing spinal revision between September 2016 and March 2018 were analyzed. In all patients sonication of removed spinal implants and at least one peri-implant tissue culture were performed. Demographic data, including age, gender, clinical manifestation, comorbidities, laboratory values (CRP and blood leukocytes), were recorded. Microorganisms causing PSII were documented. Sensitivity and specificity of sonication and peri-implant tissue culture were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were included. PSII was diagnosed in 35 patients, representing 29.6% of the study cohort. Sensitivities of tissue and sonication fluid culture were 65.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 48.6-80.0) and 94.3% (95% CI 85.7-100) (p value = 0.002) and specificities 96.4% (95% CI 91.6-100) and 98.8% (95% CI 96.4-100), respectively. The most common microorganisms found in PSII were coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Propionibacterium acnes. Eleven PSIIs were detected only by sonicate fluid culture. CONCLUSIONS: Culture of samples obtained by spinal implant sonication was more sensitive than conventional peri-implant tissue culture for the microbiological diagnosis of PSII. Therefore, sonication should be used as a routine tool in the diagnostic workup of PSII. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Authors: Andrej Trampuz; Kerryl E Piper; Arlen D Hanssen; Douglas R Osmon; Franklin R Cockerill; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Andrej Trampuz; Kerryl E Piper; Melissa J Jacobson; Arlen D Hanssen; Krishnan K Unni; Douglas R Osmon; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Franklin R Cockerill; James M Steckelberg; James F Greenleaf; Robin Patel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-08-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kerryl E Piper; Marta Fernandez-Sampedro; Kathryn E Steckelberg; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Melissa J Karau; James M Steckelberg; Elie F Berbari; Douglas R Osmon; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen; Robert H Cofield; John W Sperling; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Paul M Huddleston; Mark B Dekutoski; Michael Yaszemski; Bradford Currier; Robin Patel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pascale Bémer; S Corvec; S Tariel; N Asseray; D Boutoille; C Langlois; B Tequi; H Drugeon; N Passuti; S Touchais Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Iona Collins; James Wilson-MacDonald; George Chami; Will Burgoyne; P Vinayakam; Tony Berendt; Jeremy Fairbank Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2007-12-13 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Elie F Berbari; Camelia Marculescu; Irene Sia; Brian D Lahr; Arlen D Hanssen; James M Steckelberg; Rachel Gullerud; Douglas R Osmon Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-09-26 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Todd J Kowalski; Elie F Berbari; Paul M Huddleston; James M Steckelberg; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Douglas R Osmon Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-02-14 Impact factor: 9.079