| Literature DB >> 28865459 |
Hui-Man Cheng1,2, Yang-Chang Wu3,4, Qingmin Wang5, Michael Song5, Jackson Wu1,6, Dion Chen5, Katherine Li5, Eric Wadman5, Shung-Te Kao2,7, Tsai-Chung Li8, Francisco Leon5, Karen Hayden5, Carrie Brodmerkel5, C Chris Huang9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Indigo naturalis is a Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) ingredient long-recognized as a therapy for several inflammatory conditions, including psoriasis. However, its mechanism is unknown due to lack of knowledge about the responsible chemical entity. We took a different approach to this challenge by investigating the molecular profile of Indigo naturalis treatment and impacted pathways.Entities:
Keywords: Gene expression; Indigo naturalis; Mechanism of action; Psoriasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28865459 PMCID: PMC5581407 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1947-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Fig. 1Study design. (a) Patient disposition; (b) study design; (c) study agent and placebo. The Indigo naturalis ointment used was a mixture (1:10) of Indigo naturalis powder and vehicle (Vaseline, microcrystalline wax, and olive oil [5:6:9]). Placebo preparation used was a mixture of blue dye powder (Indigo carmine aluminum lake [Blue #2] and Allura red AC aluminum lake [Red #40]) and vehicle
Baseline demographics and disease characteristics
| Placebo |
| Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients randomized, n | 8 | 16 | 24 |
| Men, n (%) | 7 (87.5) | 10 (62.5) | 17 (70.8) |
| Race, n (%) | |||
| Asian | 8 (100) | 16 (100) | 24 (100) |
| Age, years | 40.1 ± 10.9 | 39.3 ± 10.1 | 39.6 ± 10.1 |
| Weight, kg | 74.1 ± 16.7 | 73.2 ± 16.0 | 73.5 ± 15.9 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 25.2 ± 4.6 | 25.9 ± 3.9 | 25.7 ± 4.0 |
| Duration of psoriasis, years | 14.9 ± 12.1 | 13.1 ± 11.1 | 13.7 ± 11.2 |
| Age at diagnosis, years | 25.3 ± 13.3 | 26.2 ± 12.0 | 25.7 ± 11.2 |
| BSA involvement (%), | 9.6 ± 5.8 | 8.4 ± 5.8 | 8.8 ± 5.7 |
| PASI score (0–72) | 11.1 ± 3.7 | 10.1 ± 4.3 | 10.4 ± 4.0 |
| ≥ 10, n (%) | 4 (50.0) | 8 (50.0) | 12 (50.0) |
| < 10, n (%) | 4 (50.0) | 8 (50.0) | 12 (50.0) |
| PGA score | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.5 | 3.1 ± 0.5 |
| OTPSS | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.5 |
Values are mean ± SD, unless otherwise indicated
BSA body surface area, OTPSS Overall Target Plaque Severity Score, PASI Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PGA Physician's Global Assessment, SD standard deviation
Fig. 2Efficacy assessments. (a) Mean PASI scores; (b) proportion of placebo- and Indigo naturalis-treated patients achieving a PASI 75 response (PASI 75 responders); (c) mean PGA scores; (d) and mean OTPSS in placebo- and Indigo naturalis-treated patients by study visit; (e) photo of a patient prior to Indigo naturalis treatment at week 0 (baseline) (left panel) and at week 8 following Indigo naturalis treatment (right panel). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.005 vs. placebo. OTPSS, Overall Target Plaque Severity Score; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PGA, Physician's Global Assessmen t; SD, standard deviation
Patient safety data through week 9
| Placebo |
| |
|---|---|---|
| Patients treated, n | 8 | 16 |
| Patients with >1 adverse event, n (%) | 4 (50.0) | 7 (44.0) |
| Average duration of follow-up (weeks) | 9.14 | 9.13 |
| Average exposure (weeks) | 8.16 | 8.13 |
| Common adverse events, n (%) | ||
| Pruritus | 1 (12.5) | 4 (25.0) |
| Rash | 0 (0.0) | 2 (12.5) |
| Nasopharyngitis | 0 (0.0) | 2 (12.5) |
| Abdominal distension | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.3) |
| Constipation | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.3) |
| Cough | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.3) |
| Dizziness | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.3) |
| Oropharyngeal pain | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.3) |
| Gout | 1 (12.5) | 0 (0.0) |
| Allergies | 1 (12.5) | 0 (0.0) |
| Pyrexia | 1 (12.5) | 0 (0.0) |
Fig. 3Moderate psoriasis signature. (a) Hierarchical clustering diagram of a moderate psoriasis signature generated from biopsies taken from lesional skin (LS; blue bar) and nonlesional skin (NS; green bar at the bottom) of the same patients at baseline; genes are represented as rows and samples as columns. Upregulated genes are shown in yellow and downregulated in blue; (b) enrichment of ingenuity pathways by moderate psoriasis gene signature. The stacked bar chart displays the number of up-regulated (red) and down-regulated (green) genes in each Ingenuity Canonical Pathway. The pathways are ranked by the p-value of a Fisher exact test from top to bottom (orange line; p-value listed in Additional file S1)
Fig. 4Indigo naturalis treatment signature. (a) Hierarchical clustering diagram of baseline and post-Indigo naturalis treatment (week 8) samples of the entire study cohort; genes are represented as rows and samples as columns. Upregulated genes are shown in yellow and downregulated in blue. Samples from four different groups are denoted as follows: baseline lesional (BL_LS; blue), baseline nonlesional (BL_NL; green), week-8 Indigo naturalis-treated lesional (W8_LS_IND; purple), and week-8 placebo-treated (W8_LS_PLB; yellow); (b) a Venn diagram comparing moderate psoriasis gene signature (dark blue circle on the left) and Indigo naturalis treatment signature (light blue circle on the right); (c) enrichment of Ingenuity pathways by Indigo naturalis treatment gene signature. The stacked bar chart displays the number of up-regulated (red) and down-regulated (green) in each Ingenuity Canonical Pathway. The pathways are ranked by the p-value of a Fisher exact test from top to bottom (orange line; p-value listed in Additional file 3); (d) the “Role of IL-17A in psoriasis” pathway overlaid with the gene expression pattern and each circle represents one gene. Differential expression between lesional and nonlesional sample at baseline is shown in left-half of each circle, and differential expression between week 8 and baseline samples is shown in right- half of circles. Yellow = up-regulated, blue = down-regulated, IL = interleukin, RA, receptor A, RC, receptor C
Fig. 5Indigo naturalis’ impact on the IL-17 pathway. (a) Down-regulation of interleukin (IL)-17A mRNA in the lesional skin (LS). Indigo naturalis-treated samples (blue filled-circle) are the left columns (week 0 [WK 0]: n = 16; week 8 [WK 8]: n = 14); placebo-treated samples (green triangles) are the middle two columns (WK 0: n = 8; WK 8: n = 7), and baseline nonlesional (NL) samples (gray square) are the right column (n = 23); (b) inhibition of IL-17-induced IL-6 secretion in cultured human keratinocytes. 100 mg/mL of IL-17 is present in all samples except media alone (first column). Compounds are tested in the following order: PD 0325901 1 μg (n = 2), 10 μg (n = 2); Tryptanthrin 0.3 μg (n = 7), 2.5 μg (n = 7) and 10 μg (n = 7). *T-test p-value ≤0.05; (c) inhibition of IL-17-induced IL-8 secretion in cultured human keratinocytes. 100 mg/mL of IL-17 is present in all samples except media alone (first column). IL, interleukin; mRNA, messenger RNA; SEM, standard error of mean