Literature DB >> 28864655

Cupriavidus necator H16 Uses Flavocytochrome c Sulfide Dehydrogenase To Oxidize Self-Produced and Added Sulfide.

Chuanjuan Lü1, Yongzhen Xia1, Daixi Liu1, Rui Zhao1, Rui Gao1, Honglei Liu2, Luying Xun2,3.   

Abstract

Production of sulfide (H2S, HS-, and S2-) by heterotrophic bacteria during aerobic growth is a common phenomenon. Some bacteria with sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase (SQR) and persulfide dioxygenase (PDO) can oxidize self-produced sulfide to sulfite and thiosulfate, but other bacteria without these enzymes release sulfide into the medium, from which H2S can volatilize into the gas phase. Here, we report that Cupriavidus necator H16, with the fccA and fccB genes encoding flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenases (FCSDs), also oxidized self-produced H2S. A mutant in which fccA and fccB were deleted accumulated and released H2S. When fccA and fccB were expressed in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain Pa3K with deletions of its sqr and pdo genes, the recombinant rapidly oxidized sulfide to sulfane sulfur. When PDO was also cloned into the recombinant, the recombinant with both FCSD and PDO oxidized sulfide to sulfite and thiosulfate. Thus, the proposed pathway is similar to the pathway catalyzed by SQR and PDO, in which FCSD oxidizes sulfide to polysulfide, polysulfide spontaneously reacts with reduced glutathione (GSH) to produce glutathione persulfide (GSSH), and PDO oxidizes GSSH to sulfite, which chemically reacts with polysulfide to produce thiosulfate. About 20.6% of sequenced bacterial genomes contain SQR, and only 3.9% contain FCSD. This is not a surprise, since SQR is more efficient in conserving energy because it passes electrons from sulfide oxidation into the electron transport chain at the quinone level, while FCSD passes electrons to cytochrome c The transport of electrons from the latter to O2 conserves less energy. FCSDs are grouped into three subgroups, well conserved at the taxonomic level. Thus, our data show the diversity in sulfide oxidation by heterotrophic bacteria.IMPORTANCE Heterotrophic bacteria with SQR and PDO can oxidize self-produced sulfide and do not release H2S into the gas phase. C. necator H16 has FCSD but not SQR, and it does not release H2S. We confirmed that the bacterium used FCSD for the oxidation of self-produced sulfide. The bacterium also oxidized added sulfide. The common presence of SQRs, FCSDs, and PDOs in heterotrophic bacteria suggests the significant role of heterotrophic bacteria in sulfide oxidation, participating in sulfur biogeochemical cycling. Further, FCSDs have been identified in anaerobic photosynthetic bacteria and chemolithotrophic bacteria, but their physiological roles are unknown. We showed that heterotrophic bacteria use FCSDs to oxidize self-produced sulfide and extraneous sulfide, and they may be used for H2S bioremediation.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cupriavidus necator H16; flavocytochrome c; persulfide dioxygenase; sulfide; sulfide dehydrogenase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28864655      PMCID: PMC5666145          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01610-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  56 in total

1.  Novel genes of the sox gene cluster, mutagenesis of the flavoprotein SoxF, and evidence for a general sulfur-oxidizing system in Paracoccus pantotrophus GB17.

Authors:  D Rother; H J Henrich; A Quentmeier; F Bardischewsky; C G Friedrich
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Oxidation of H2S in seawater as a function of temperature, pH, and ionic strength.

Authors:  F J Millero; S Hubinger; M Fernandez; S Garnett
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1987-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Hydrogen sulfide anion regulates redox signaling via electrophile sulfhydration.

Authors:  Motohiro Nishida; Tomohiro Sawa; Naoyuki Kitajima; Katsuhiko Ono; Hirofumi Inoue; Hideshi Ihara; Hozumi Motohashi; Masayuki Yamamoto; Makoto Suematsu; Hitoshi Kurose; Albert van der Vliet; Bruce A Freeman; Takahiro Shibata; Koji Uchida; Yoshito Kumagai; Takaaki Akaike
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 15.040

4.  Conjugal transfer of plasmid DNA from Escherichia coli to enterococci: a method to make insertion mutations.

Authors:  F Teng; B E Murray; G M Weinstock
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  H2S signals through protein S-sulfhydration.

Authors:  Asif K Mustafa; Moataz M Gadalla; Nilkantha Sen; Seyun Kim; Weitong Mu; Sadia K Gazi; Roxanne K Barrow; Guangdong Yang; Rui Wang; Solomon H Snyder
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 8.192

6.  Cytochrome c (553, Chlorobium thiosulfatophilum) is a sulphide-cytochrome c reductase.

Authors:  A Kusai; T Yamanaka
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1973-08-15       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  Isolation and characterization of a sulfur-oxidizing chemolithotroph growing on crude oil under anaerobic conditions.

Authors:  Yumiko Kodama; Kazuya Watanabe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Sulfur metabolism in the extreme acidophile acidithiobacillus caldus.

Authors:  Stefanie Mangold; Jorge Valdés; David S Holmes; Mark Dopson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  The life sulfuric: microbial ecology of sulfur cycling in marine sediments.

Authors:  Kenneth Wasmund; Marc Mußmann; Alexander Loy
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.541

10.  Quantitative H2S-mediated protein sulfhydration reveals metabolic reprogramming during the integrated stress response.

Authors:  Xing-Huang Gao; Dawid Krokowski; Bo-Jhih Guan; Ilya Bederman; Mithu Majumder; Marc Parisien; Luda Diatchenko; Omer Kabil; Belinda Willard; Ruma Banerjee; Benlian Wang; Gurkan Bebek; Charles R Evans; Paul L Fox; Stanton L Gerson; Charles L Hoppel; Ming Liu; Peter Arvan; Maria Hatzoglou
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  6 in total

1.  X-Ray Structure of Human Sulfide:Quinone Oxidoreductase: Insights into the Mechanism of Mitochondrial Hydrogen Sulfide Oxidation.

Authors:  Michael R Jackson; Patrick J Loll; Marilyn Schuman Jorns
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Rhodaneses minimize the accumulation of cellular sulfane sulfur to avoid disulfide stress during sulfide oxidation in bacteria.

Authors:  Mingxue Ran; Qingbin Li; Yufeng Xin; Shaohua Ma; Rui Zhao; Min Wang; Luying Xun; Yongzhen Xia
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 10.787

3.  RetS Regulates Phage Infection in Pseudomonas aeruginosa via Modulating the GacS/GacA Two-Component System.

Authors:  Guanhua Xuan; Hong Lin; Xiaoyan Li; Jiuna Kong; Jingxue Wang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.549

4.  The Heterotrophic Bacterium Cupriavidus pinatubonensis JMP134 Oxidizes Sulfide to Sulfate with Thiosulfate as a Key Intermediate.

Authors:  Yufeng Xin; Rui Gao; Feifei Cui; Chuanjuan Lü; Honglei Liu; Huaiwei Liu; Yongzhen Xia; Luying Xun
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Synechococcus sp. Strain PCC7002 Uses Sulfide:Quinone Oxidoreductase To Detoxify Exogenous Sulfide and To Convert Endogenous Sulfide to Cellular Sulfane Sulfur.

Authors:  Daixi Liu; Jiajie Zhang; Chuanjuan Lü; Yongzhen Xia; Huaiwei Liu; Nianzhi Jiao; Luying Xun; Jihua Liu
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Metagenomic analysis of microbial community structure and function in a improved biofilter with odorous gases.

Authors:  Jianguo Ni; Huayun Yang; Liqing Chen; Jiadong Xu; Liangwei Zheng; Guojian Xie; Chenjia Shen; Weidong Li; Qi Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.