Literature DB >> 28864044

Transvaginal Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Marina Paula Andres1, Giuliano Moysés Borrelli1, Juliana Ribeiro1, Edmund Chada Baracat1, Mauricio Simões Abrão2, Rosanne M Kho3.   

Abstract

Adenomyosis is characterized by the presence of ectopic foci of endometrial glandular tissue and/or stroma within the myometrium. The diagnosis of adenomyosis is traditionally made through histologic evaluation of the postsurgical specimen. More recently, imaging with transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) has been used for the preoperative diagnosis of adenomyosis. As yet, there is no consensus regarding the best imaging feature or combination thereof for the nonsurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis. This study systematically evaluated the literature in the last 10 years to determine the accuracy of 2-dimensional (2D) TVUS, different imaging features, enhancing methods such as 3-dimensional (3D) TVUS, elastography and color Doppler in the nonsurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis. A total of 8 studies were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for 2D TVUS for the diagnosis of adenomyosis for all combined imaging characteristics was 83.8% and 63.9%, respectively. Pooled sensitivity for 355 total patients with use of imaging feature of heterogeneous myometrium with 2D TVUS was highest (86.0%), and pooled specificity for 283 total patients with use of globular uterus was highest (78.1%). After including the "question mark" sign with other TVUS features, higher sensitivity and specificity, of 92% and 88%, respectively, were noted. For 3D TVUS, pooled sensitivity and specificity for all combined imaging characteristics was 88.9% and 56.0%, respectively. Poor definition of junctional zone showed the highest pooled sensitivity (86%) and the highest pooled specificity (56.0%) for the diagnosis of adenomyosis with 3D TVUS. There was no improvement in overall accuracy in 3D TVUS compared with 2D TVUS. Preliminary results of TVUS with color Doppler showed a high sensitivity and specificity for the differentiation between adenomyosis and myomas (95.6% and 93.4%, respectively). Also, TVUS elastography in 1 study showed an improvement in specificity (82.9%) compared with 2D TVUS (63.9%), albeit with comparable sensitivity. Larger studies are needed to advance our understanding of the different types of adenomyosis and their clinical impact.
Copyright © 2017 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D imaging; Adenomyosis; Color; Doppler; Meta-analysis; Transvaginal ultrasound; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28864044     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  15 in total

1.  Transvaginal ultrasound-guided biopsy of adenomyosis.

Authors:  Simone Ferrero; Carolina Scala; Valerio Gaetano Vellone; Ennio Biscaldi; Fabio Barra
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

2.  Prevalence of adenomyosis in women undergoing hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain or uterine prolapse - A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Harald Krentel; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Association of 2D and 3D transvaginal ultrasound findings with adenomyosis in symptomatic women of reproductive age: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Santos Marques; Marina Paula Andres; Leandro A Mattos; Manoel O Gonçalves; Edmund Chada Baracat; Mauricio Simões Abrão
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 4.  Recent advances in understanding and managing adenomyosis.

Authors:  Silvia Vannuccini; Felice Petraglia
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-13

5.  Effects of Etonogestrel implants on pelvic pain and menstrual flow in women suffering from adenomyosis or endometriosis: Results from a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Xiaocen Niu; Qun Luo; Chunfen Wang; Lihua Zhu; Lili Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  Classifying Adenomyosis: Progress and Challenges.

Authors:  Marwan Habiba; Giuseppe Benagiano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  A Detailed Study in Adenomyosis and Endometriosis: Evaluation of the Rate of Coexistence Between Uterine Adenomyosis and DIE According to Imaging and Histopathology Findings.

Authors:  Saeed Alborzi; Elham Askary; Farideh Khorami; Tahereh Poordast; Batool Abdulwahid Hashim Alkhalidi; Mahboobeh Hamedi; Soroush Alborzi; Hadi Raeisi Shahraki
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 8.  From Clinical Symptoms to MR Imaging: Diagnostic Steps in Adenomyosis.

Authors:  H Krentel; C Cezar; S Becker; A Di Spiezio Sardo; V Tanos; M Wallwiener; R L De Wilde
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Evaluation of adenomyosis after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist therapy using ultrasound post-processing imaging: a pilot study.

Authors:  Szu-Yuan Chou; Cindy Chan; Yu-Chieh Lee; Tzu-Ning Yu; Chii-Ruey Tzeng; Chi-Huang Chen
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 10.  Biomarkers in abnormal uterine bleeding†.

Authors:  Rohan Chodankar; Hilary O D Critchley
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.