Literature DB >> 28862633

Nanosecond pump-probe device for time-resolved serial femtosecond crystallography developed at SACLA.

Minoru Kubo1, Eriko Nango1, Kensuke Tono2, Tetsunari Kimura1, Shigeki Owada1, Changyong Song1, Fumitaka Mafuné3, Ken Miyajima3, Yoshihiro Takeda4, Jun Ya Kohno5, Naoya Miyauchi6, Takanori Nakane7, Tomoyuki Tanaka1, Takashi Nomura1, Jan Davidsson8, Rie Tanaka1, Michio Murata9, Takashi Kameshima2, Takaki Hatsui1, Yasumasa Joti2, Richard Neutze10, Makina Yabashi1, So Iwata1.   

Abstract

X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs) have opened new opportunities for time-resolved X-ray crystallography. Here a nanosecond optical-pump XFEL-probe device developed for time-resolved serial femtosecond crystallography (TR-SFX) studies of photo-induced reactions in proteins at the SPring-8 Angstrom Compact free-electron LAser (SACLA) is reported. The optical-fiber-based system is a good choice for a quick setup in a limited beam time and allows pump illumination from two directions to achieve high excitation efficiency of protein microcrystals. Two types of injectors are used: one for extruding highly viscous samples such as lipidic cubic phase (LCP) and the other for pulsed liquid droplets. Under standard sample flow conditions from the viscous-sample injector, delay times from nanoseconds to tens of milliseconds are accessible, typical time scales required to study large protein conformational changes. A first demonstration of a TR-SFX experiment on bacteriorhodopsin in bicelle using a setup with a droplet-type injector is also presented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  XFEL; pump and probe; serial femtosecond crystallography; time-resolved X-ray crystallography

Year:  2017        PMID: 28862633      PMCID: PMC5580792          DOI: 10.1107/S160057751701030X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat        ISSN: 0909-0495            Impact factor:   2.616


Introduction

With the development of X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs), X-ray crystallography of proteins entered a new phase. One of the key emerging techniques is serial femtosecond crystallography (SFX), which uses a continuous flow of microcrystals in random orientations to obtain diffraction images on a single-shot basis (Chapman et al., 2011 ▸; Boutet et al., 2012 ▸). Continuous sample delivery in SFX is advantageous in time-resolved (TR) experiments because activated samples are replaced with fresh samples immediately during data collection. Among various TR techniques, the pump–probe method is well established and can easily be combined with SFX to observe photo-induced reactions (Kern et al., 2014 ▸; Kupitz et al., 2014 ▸; Tenboer et al., 2014 ▸; Pande et al., 2016 ▸; Barends et al., 2015 ▸). The femtosecond laser systems installed at the XFEL facilities [LCLS (Minitti et al., 2015 ▸) and SACLA (Togashi et al., 2014 ▸)] are available for researchers to observe photo-induced reactions with femtosecond time resolution. On ultrafast time scales (femtoseconds to picoseconds), protein motions are local and often involve chromophore or amino acid side chains. In contrast, motions on slower time scales (nanoseconds to milliseconds) might involve larger conformational changes in association with protein function. A pump–probe TR-SFX setup using a nanosecond laser is useful for observing such protein movements on a slower time scale. Here we report the development of an optical-fiber-based setup for a nanosecond pump–probe TR-SFX at SACLA. This simple robust system allows quick setup, and pump conditions (wavelength and focal size) are readily adjustable so users can collect as much data as possible in limited XFEL beam time. In this system, pump light illuminates protein microcrystals from two directions, thus enabling higher-efficiency sample excitation. In this paper, we also reveal an application to bacteriorhodopsin (bR) in bicelle using a droplet injector (Mafuné et al., 2016 ▸), a first demonstration of a TR-SFX experiment with a droplet injector.

Instrumentation

Overview of the experimental setup

We previously reported an experimental setup without a pump system for SFX, named DAPHNIS (Diverse Application Platform for Hard X-ray diffractioN In SACLA) (Tono et al., 2015 ▸), which consisted mainly of a helium chamber, an injector holder and a multiport charge-coupled device (MPCCD) detector (Kameshima et al., 2014 ▸). Due to limited space in the chamber, incorporating a pump system into DAPHNIS was not feasible. Therefore, we designed a new experimental setup using a nanosecond laser for TR-SFX, composed of a pump laser system, an injector holder, microscopes and the MPCCD detector (Fig. 1 ▸). Instead of a helium chamber, a helium gas flow path was introduced to reduce background noise from air scattering (Fig. 1b ▸). An XFEL beam from the focusing system enters the setup through a beryllium window and passes through the helium gas flow path, intersecting with a sample stream. Samples are delivered to an XFEL focal point using a sample injector mounted on a motorized manipulator. For sample injection, two types of injectors are available: one is for ejecting viscous samples, such as the lipidic cubic phase (LCP) (Weierstall et al., 2014 ▸), and the other is for pulsed liquid droplets (Mafuné et al., 2016 ▸). The viscous-sample injector (Shimazu et al., 2017 ▸) was developed on the LCP injector concept reported by Weierstall et al. (2014 ▸), and this setup was utilized in the TR-SFX study of bR in LCP (Nango et al., 2016 ▸). Recently, structural changes of photosystem II (Suga et al., 2017 ▸) were also reported, using the same setup with grease as a carrier medium (Sugahara et al., 2015 ▸). In these studies, sample flow speed was set to 5.3 mm s−1 (photosystem II) or 9.4 mm s−1 (bR) to avoid light contamination, whereas samples can be injected at slower flow speed (∼1 mm s−1) in an SFX experiment without a pump laser. Since microcrystals travel relatively fast during the delay time after photo-excitation, the longest delay time is currently limited to approximately 20 ms. The shortest delay time is 7 ns as described in the following section.
Figure 1

(a) Experimental setup for the pump–probe TR-SFX. An enlarged view around the sample is shown in (b) and a photograph of the same enlarged view in (c).

Three microscopes are used for sample flow observation or for alignment of the injector position into the pump and XFEL interaction volume using XYZ stages controllable from the outside of the experimental hutch. To protect the detector from the intense primary XFEL beam, a beam stopper is placed on the Kapton window in front of the detector. The Kapton window and a beryllium window of the detector work effectively as filters for pump light scattering. Further to suppress pump light scattering, components around the sample are black. The distance between the MPCCD sensor and the sample is adjustable from 50 to 100 mm. The setup’s maximum resolution is 1.5 Å at a sensor-to-sample distance of 50 mm and an X-ray wavelength of 1.24 Å due to the sensor-area span.

Pump laser system

Two types of pump laser systems are available. (i) An optical parametric oscillator (OPO) provides >1 mJ, 6 ns pulses at a wavelength tunable from 300 to 2000 nm, with a repetition rate up to 30 Hz (NT230, EKSPLA). This system can trigger various photo-induced reactions and is promising for photolysis of caged-compounds that can initiate enzymatic reactions. Note that, although various caged-compounds are commercially available (Ellis-Davies, 2007 ▸), they have to be selected so that the uncaging time scale is short enough compared with the time range of the observed protein dynamics. (ii) The SHG output of an Nd:YAG laser is also available; this delivers 12 mJ, 5 ns pulses at 532 nm with a repetition rate up to 15 Hz (Minilite-I, Continuum). The same two Nd:YAG lasers have been installed, so two-flash excitation is available at 532 nm (Suga et al., 2017 ▸). Using a 50:50 beamsplitter, the pump beam is divided into two arms, each fed into an optical fiber with a core diameter of 50–400 µm [numerical aperture (NA) 0.22] (Optran UV/WF with high-power SMA, CeramOptec). Optical fibers deliver pump beams near the sample (Fig. 1b ▸). Each output beam from a fiber is collimated with a diameter of 10 mm using a fiber-coupled collimator (NA 0.175) (FC10-VIS-T or FC10S-UV1-FC, Micro Laser Systems) and focused on a sample stream using an objective lens (M Plan Apo 10× with NA 0.28, MITSUTOYO or LMU-5X-NUV/-UVB with NA 0.13, THORLABS). Note that optical fibers facilitate the pump beams’ alignment procedure. Because the pump beam paths from the laser to fiber inputs and from fiber outputs to objective lenses are normally fixed, the only thing to perform for pump-beam transportation is fiber attachment. On the other hand, if one used a femtosecond laser in the setup, irradiating enough intense laser pulses to excite samples would be difficult due to the fiber’s damage threshold. Furthermore, second- or higher-order dispersion is liable to extend pulse duration. The two pump beams illuminate two sides of the crystal in a nearly counter-propagating geometry (∼80° off the X-ray beam) to enhance excitation efficiency. The off-axis angle should be greater than 75° to avoid pump beams directly entering the MPCCD. The pump’s focal size depends on the optics’ combination, but is controllable by fiber core size (50–400 µm). The minimum focal size is 20 µm (FWHM) using a 50 µm core size fiber, while the focal size is expandable to 240 µm (top-hat) using a 400 µm core size fiber (Fig. 2 ▸). A focal size of 40 µm (FWHM) using a 100 µm core size fiber fits a 75 µm-diameter sample stream, and this is a typical setup for TR-SFX using the viscous-sample injector at SACLA (Shimazu et al., 2017 ▸).
Figure 2

Spatial profile of the 532 nm pump beam using a fiber with a core size of (a) 50 µm and (b) 400 µm. The beam profile was estimated by a CCD beam profiler (SP620, Ophir-Spiricon).

The pump laser is synchronized with the XFEL via a delay generator (DG645, Stanford Research Systems), triggered by the TTL signal provided to users at 15 ms prior to each XFEL pulse. The delay time between pump and XFEL pulses is adjusted with the delay generator, which enables users’ easy operation. Because the timing jitter is <1 ns, the time resolution is <7 ns. Typically, the pump laser’s repetition rate is set to half of that of the XFEL by the same delay generator in order to collect the alternating ‘light-on’ and ‘light-off’ diffraction data, the latter of which serve as a dark dataset. To discriminate ‘light-on’ or ‘light-off’ data, a portion of the pump beam (5%) is picked off with a beam sampler, and its voltage signal detected by a photodiode tags a diffraction image with ‘light-on’. The photodiode readout is stored in the SACLA data acquisition system’s database, along with other shot-by-shot metadata such as wavelength and beam intensity. The data processing pipeline (Nakane et al., 2016a ▸) retrieves data through the SACLA API (Joti et al., 2015 ▸) and then sorts hit images into ‘light-on’ and ‘light-off’ datasets. The pump beam can be aligned spatially with the XFEL beam using XYZ stages controllable from outside of the experimental hutch. First, the pump beam center is aligned to overlap with the XFEL and then is raised using a Z stage that depends on a delay time, to illuminate a sample flow’s upper stream. Note here that, when the pump beam center is positioned in the upper stream relative to the XFEL spot, we usually set the pump beam area’s size large enough to overlap spatially with the XFEL spot. (For example, in the case of a sample flow rate of ∼5 mm s−1, crystals move ∼100 µm in 20 ms. For measurement with a 20 ms delay time, the pump beam center is aligned and positioned ∼100 µm upstream from the XFEL spot, while the pump beam size is set to greater than 200 µm diameter, so the area covers the XFEL spot.) Such a pump–XFEL spatial overlap contributes to the integrity of ‘light-on’ data, which should be derived from pump-illuminated crystals even if the sample flow rate fluctuates.

Application

We performed a TR-SFX experiment on the membrane protein bR, a light-driven proton pump, using the pump–probe TR-SFX device at the EH4c experimental station of SACLA BL3 (Ishikawa et al., 2012 ▸; Tono et al., 2013 ▸). In this experiment, bR crystals in bicelle were loaded with a liquid carrier to the droplet injector, which is synchronized to XFEL pulses (Mafuné et al., 2016 ▸). We crystallized bR in bicelle, prepared by mixing DMPC/CHAPSO with a precipitant solution composed of 3.2 M NaH2PO4, 3.5% tri­ethyl­ene glycol and 180 mM 1,6-hexandiol (Faham et al., 2005 ▸; Nakane et al., 2016b ▸). bR crystals including the precipitant mixture were ejected from the droplet injector equipped with a 80 µm nozzle. The amplitude and duration of the electric pulse for driving the droplet injector were set to 90 V and 90 µs, respectively. Data were collected using 7.6 keV X-ray pulses with a duration of <10 fs at 30 Hz. The pump laser (Minilite-I, Continuum), with a 532 nm wavelength, was operated at 15 Hz to provide ‘light-on’ and ‘light-off’ interleaved images. The pump focal diameter was 160 µm (FWHM), and its intensity was 8 µJ at the sample point. The delay time between pump and XFEL pulses was set to 1 µs. The droplet’s flow speed was ∼14 m s−1. While the illuminated droplet traveled 14 µm downward during a delay time of 1 µs, the droplet was so large (80 µm in diameter) that it could interact with the XFEL beam. Therefore, under the present experimental conditions, the longest delay time is limited to approximately 2 µs. bR crystals diffracted to 2.2 Å. A total of 371648 diffraction patterns were collected, of which 20418 (20890) were identified as hit images in the light (dark) condition, with more than 20 potential Bragg peaks, by using the data processing pipeline (Nakane et al., 2016a ▸) based on Cheetah (Barty et al., 2014 ▸). By further processing in CrystFEL version 0.6.1 (White et al., 2012 ▸), 16186 (16548) indexed images were obtained as light (dark) data (Table S1 of the supporting information). A difference Fourier map was calculated from the light/dark datasets using the CCP4 suite (Winn et al., 2011 ▸) and showed structural changes on the periphery of the retinal that underwent isomerization in response to light (Fig. 3 ▸). Positive and negative difference densities appeared on the retinal and around Lys216 of helix G; this indicates structural changes at a relatively early stage in the bR photocycle. Whereas, to maintain a smooth sample flow, monoolein and liquid paraffin were added to the bR-crystal sample in LCP before measurement in the TR-SFX experiment (Nango et al., 2016 ▸), the droplet injector allows injection of pristine crystals without any additional agents. The combination of the droplet injector and the pump–probe TR-SFX device would be beneficial for observing structural changes on protein crystals sensitive to additives.
Figure 3

F(light) − F(dark) difference electron density for 1 µs time delay data. Blue represents a positive difference density (contoured at +3.5σ) and yellow a negative difference density (contoured at −3.5σ).

Conclusions

We have developed a setup for nanosecond pump–probe TR-SFX at SACLA and successfully applied it to bR in bicelle by using a pulsed liquid droplet injector. Nanosecond time resolution is enough for biological applications, particularly when studying proteins’ large functional motions. Moreover, the nanosecond system is simple, robust and easy to operate, allowing users to collect as much data as possible in limited beam time. One of the most powerful ways to expand applications of pump–probe TR-SFX would be to use caged-compounds. The present system, which can provide various pump wavelengths from UV to near IR, is compatible with such applications.

Related literature

The following reference is cited in the supporting information for this article: Duisenberg (1992 ▸). Crystallographic statistics. DOI: 10.1107/S160057751701030X/rv5066sup1.pdf
  22 in total

1.  Crystallization of bacteriorhodopsin from bicelle formulations at room temperature.

Authors:  Salem Faham; Gabriella L Boulting; Elizabeth A Massey; Sarah Yohannan; Dawn Yang; James U Bowie
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Grease matrix as a versatile carrier of proteins for serial crystallography.

Authors:  Michihiro Sugahara; Eiichi Mizohata; Eriko Nango; Mamoru Suzuki; Tomoyuki Tanaka; Tetsuya Masuda; Rie Tanaka; Tatsuro Shimamura; Yoshiki Tanaka; Chiyo Suno; Kentaro Ihara; Dongqing Pan; Keisuke Kakinouchi; Shigeru Sugiyama; Michio Murata; Tsuyoshi Inoue; Kensuke Tono; Changyong Song; Jaehyun Park; Takashi Kameshima; Takaki Hatsui; Yasumasa Joti; Makina Yabashi; So Iwata
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Light-induced structural changes and the site of O=O bond formation in PSII caught by XFEL.

Authors:  Michihiro Suga; Fusamichi Akita; Michihiro Sugahara; Minoru Kubo; Yoshiki Nakajima; Takanori Nakane; Keitaro Yamashita; Yasufumi Umena; Makoto Nakabayashi; Takahiro Yamane; Takamitsu Nakano; Mamoru Suzuki; Tetsuya Masuda; Shigeyuki Inoue; Tetsunari Kimura; Takashi Nomura; Shinichiro Yonekura; Long-Jiang Yu; Tomohiro Sakamoto; Taiki Motomura; Jing-Hua Chen; Yuki Kato; Takumi Noguchi; Kensuke Tono; Yasumasa Joti; Takashi Kameshima; Takaki Hatsui; Eriko Nango; Rie Tanaka; Hisashi Naitow; Yoshinori Matsuura; Ayumi Yamashita; Masaki Yamamoto; Osamu Nureki; Makina Yabashi; Tetsuya Ishikawa; So Iwata; Jian-Ren Shen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Membrane protein structure determination by SAD, SIR, or SIRAS phasing in serial femtosecond crystallography using an iododetergent.

Authors:  Takanori Nakane; Shinya Hanashima; Mamoru Suzuki; Haruka Saiki; Taichi Hayashi; Keisuke Kakinouchi; Shigeru Sugiyama; Satoshi Kawatake; Shigeru Matsuoka; Nobuaki Matsumori; Eriko Nango; Jun Kobayashi; Tatsuro Shimamura; Kanako Kimura; Chihiro Mori; Naoki Kunishima; Michihiro Sugahara; Yoko Takakyu; Shigeyuki Inoue; Tetsuya Masuda; Toshiaki Hosaka; Kensuke Tono; Yasumasa Joti; Takashi Kameshima; Takaki Hatsui; Makina Yabashi; Tsuyoshi Inoue; Osamu Nureki; So Iwata; Michio Murata; Eiichi Mizohata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Development of an X-ray pixel detector with multi-port charge-coupled device for X-ray free-electron laser experiments.

Authors:  Takashi Kameshima; Shun Ono; Togo Kudo; Kyosuke Ozaki; Yoichi Kirihara; Kazuo Kobayashi; Yuichi Inubushi; Makina Yabashi; Toshio Horigome; Andrew Holland; Karen Holland; David Burt; Hajime Murao; Takaki Hatsui
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.523

6.  Femtosecond structural dynamics drives the trans/cis isomerization in photoactive yellow protein.

Authors:  Kanupriya Pande; Christopher D M Hutchison; Gerrit Groenhof; Andy Aquila; Josef S Robinson; Jason Tenboer; Shibom Basu; Sébastien Boutet; Daniel P DePonte; Mengning Liang; Thomas A White; Nadia A Zatsepin; Oleksandr Yefanov; Dmitry Morozov; Dominik Oberthuer; Cornelius Gati; Ganesh Subramanian; Daniel James; Yun Zhao; Jake Koralek; Jennifer Brayshaw; Christopher Kupitz; Chelsie Conrad; Shatabdi Roy-Chowdhury; Jesse D Coe; Markus Metz; Paulraj Lourdu Xavier; Thomas D Grant; Jason E Koglin; Gihan Ketawala; Raimund Fromme; Vukica Šrajer; Robert Henning; John C H Spence; Abbas Ourmazd; Peter Schwander; Uwe Weierstall; Matthias Frank; Petra Fromme; Anton Barty; Henry N Chapman; Keith Moffat; Jasper J van Thor; Marius Schmidt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments.

Authors:  Martyn D Winn; Charles C Ballard; Kevin D Cowtan; Eleanor J Dodson; Paul Emsley; Phil R Evans; Ronan M Keegan; Eugene B Krissinel; Andrew G W Leslie; Airlie McCoy; Stuart J McNicholas; Garib N Murshudov; Navraj S Pannu; Elizabeth A Potterton; Harold R Powell; Randy J Read; Alexei Vagin; Keith S Wilson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-03-18

Review 8.  Optical laser systems at the Linac Coherent Light Source.

Authors:  Michael P Minitti; Joseph S Robinson; Ryan N Coffee; Steve Edstrom; Sasha Gilevich; James M Glownia; Eduardo Granados; Philippe Hering; Matthias C Hoffmann; Alan Miahnahri; Despina Milathianaki; Wayne Polzin; Daniel Ratner; Franz Tavella; Sharon Vetter; Marc Welch; William E White; Alan R Fry
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.616

9.  Data acquisition system for X-ray free-electron laser experiments at SACLA.

Authors:  Yasumasa Joti; Takashi Kameshima; Mitsuhiro Yamaga; Takashi Sugimoto; Kensuke Okada; Toshinori Abe; Yukito Furukawa; Toru Ohata; Ryotaro Tanaka; Takaki Hatsui; Makina Yabashi
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.616

10.  Diverse application platform for hard X-ray diffraction in SACLA (DAPHNIS): application to serial protein crystallography using an X-ray free-electron laser.

Authors:  Kensuke Tono; Eriko Nango; Michihiro Sugahara; Changyong Song; Jaehyun Park; Tomoyuki Tanaka; Rie Tanaka; Yasumasa Joti; Takashi Kameshima; Shun Ono; Takaki Hatsui; Eiichi Mizohata; Mamoru Suzuki; Tatsuro Shimamura; Yoshiki Tanaka; So Iwata; Makina Yabashi
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.616

View more
  8 in total

1.  Optical control, selection and analysis of population dynamics in ultrafast protein X-ray crystallography.

Authors:  Christopher D M Hutchison; Jasper J van Thor
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Serial femtosecond crystallography at the SACLA: breakthrough to dynamic structural biology.

Authors:  Eiichi Mizohata; Takanori Nakane; Yohta Fukuda; Eriko Nango; So Iwata
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-12-01

3.  Electric Triggering for Enhanced Control of Droplet Generation.

Authors:  Daihyun Kim; Austin Echelmeier; Jorvani Cruz Villarreal; Sahir Gandhi; Sebastian Quintana; Ana Egatz-Gomez; Alexandra Ros
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  High-resolution crystal structures of transient intermediates in the phytochrome photocycle.

Authors:  Melissa Carrillo; Suraj Pandey; Juan Sanchez; Moraima Noda; Ishwor Poudyal; Luis Aldama; Tek Narsingh Malla; Elin Claesson; Weixiao Yuan Wahlgren; Denisse Feliz; Vukica Šrajer; Michał Maj; Leticia Castillon; So Iwata; Eriko Nango; Rie Tanaka; Tomoyuki Tanaka; Luo Fangjia; Kensuke Tono; Shigeki Owada; Sebastian Westenhoff; Emina A Stojković; Marius Schmidt
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Capturing structural changes of the S1 to S2 transition of photosystem II using time-resolved serial femtosecond crystallography.

Authors:  Hongjie Li; Yoshiki Nakajima; Takashi Nomura; Michihiro Sugahara; Shinichiro Yonekura; Siu Kit Chan; Takanori Nakane; Takahiro Yamane; Yasufumi Umena; Mamoru Suzuki; Tetsuya Masuda; Taiki Motomura; Hisashi Naitow; Yoshinori Matsuura; Tetsunari Kimura; Kensuke Tono; Shigeki Owada; Yasumasa Joti; Rie Tanaka; Eriko Nango; Fusamichi Akita; Minoru Kubo; So Iwata; Jian-Ren Shen; Michihiro Suga
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.769

6.  Conformational alterations in unidirectional ion transport of a light-driven chloride pump revealed using X-ray free electron lasers.

Authors:  Toshiaki Hosaka; Takashi Nomura; Minoru Kubo; Takanori Nakane; Luo Fangjia; Shun-Ichi Sekine; Takuhiro Ito; Kazutaka Murayama; Kentaro Ihara; Haruhiko Ehara; Kazuhiro Kashiwagi; Kazushige Katsura; Ryogo Akasaka; Tamao Hisano; Tomoyuki Tanaka; Rie Tanaka; Toshi Arima; Ayumi Yamashita; Michihiro Sugahara; Hisashi Naitow; Yoshinori Matsuura; Susumu Yoshizawa; Kensuke Tono; Shigeki Owada; Osamu Nureki; Tomomi Kimura-Someya; So Iwata; Eriko Nango; Mikako Shirouzu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A tool for visualizing protein motions in time-resolved crystallography.

Authors:  Cecilia Wickstrand; Gergely Katona; Takanori Nakane; Przemyslaw Nogly; Joerg Standfuss; Eriko Nango; Richard Neutze
Journal:  Struct Dyn       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.920

8.  Comparing serial X-ray crystallography and microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED) as methods for routine structure determination from small macromolecular crystals.

Authors:  Alexander M Wolff; Iris D Young; Raymond G Sierra; Aaron S Brewster; Michael W Martynowycz; Eriko Nango; Michihiro Sugahara; Takanori Nakane; Kazutaka Ito; Andrew Aquila; Asmit Bhowmick; Justin T Biel; Sergio Carbajo; Aina E Cohen; Saul Cortez; Ana Gonzalez; Tomoya Hino; Dohyun Im; Jake D Koralek; Minoru Kubo; Tomas S Lazarou; Takashi Nomura; Shigeki Owada; Avi J Samelson; Tomoyuki Tanaka; Rie Tanaka; Erin M Thompson; Henry van den Bedem; Rahel A Woldeyes; Fumiaki Yumoto; Wei Zhao; Kensuke Tono; Sebastien Boutet; So Iwata; Tamir Gonen; Nicholas K Sauter; James S Fraser; Michael C Thompson
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.769

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.