John M McPartland1,2, Christa MacDonald3, Michelle Young3, Phillip S Grant4, Daniel P Furkert4, Michelle Glass3. 1. GW Pharmaceuticals, Salisbury, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Family Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont. 3. Department of Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 4. School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
Introduction:Cannabis biosynthesizes Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA-A), which decarboxylates into Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). There is growing interest in the therapeutic use of THCA-A, but its clinical application may be hampered by instability. THCA-A lacks cannabimimetic effects; we hypothesize that it has little binding affinity at cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1). Materials and Methods: Purity of certified reference standards were tested with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Binding affinity of THCA-A and THC at human (h) CB1 and hCB2 was measured in competition binding assays, using transfected HEK cells and [3H]CP55,940. Efficacy at hCB1 and hCB2 was measured in a cyclic adenosine monophosphase (cAMP) assay, using a Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) biosensor. Results: The THCA-A reagent contained 2% THC. THCA-A displayed small but measurable binding at both hCB1 and hCB2, equating to approximate Ki values of 3.1μM and 12.5μM, respectively. THC showed 62-fold greater affinity at hCB1 and 125-fold greater affinity at hCB2. In efficacy tests, THCA-A (10μM) slightly inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP at hCB1, suggestive of weak agonist activity, and no measurable efficacy at hCB2. Discussion: The presence of THC in our THCA-A certified standard agrees with decarboxylation kinetics (literature reviewed herein), which indicate contamination with THC is nearly unavoidable. THCA-A binding at 10μM approximated THC binding at 200nM. We therefore suspect some of our THCA-A binding curve was artifact-from its inevitable decarboxylation into THC-and the binding affinity of THCA-A is even weaker than our estimated values. We conclude that THCA-A has little affinity or efficacy at CB1 or CB2.
Introduction:Cannabis biosynthesizes Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA-A), which decarboxylates into Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). There is growing interest in the therapeutic use of THCA-A, but its clinical application may be hampered by instability. THCA-A lacks cannabimimetic effects; we hypothesize that it has little binding affinity at cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1). Materials and Methods: Purity of certified reference standards were tested with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Binding affinity of THCA-A and THC at human (h) CB1 and hCB2 was measured in competition binding assays, using transfected HEK cells and [3H]CP55,940. Efficacy at hCB1 and hCB2 was measured in a cyclic adenosine monophosphase (cAMP) assay, using a Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) biosensor. Results: The THCA-A reagent contained 2% THC. THCA-A displayed small but measurable binding at both hCB1 and hCB2, equating to approximate Ki values of 3.1μM and 12.5μM, respectively. THC showed 62-fold greater affinity at hCB1 and 125-fold greater affinity at hCB2. In efficacy tests, THCA-A (10μM) slightly inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP at hCB1, suggestive of weak agonist activity, and no measurable efficacy at hCB2. Discussion: The presence of THC in our THCA-A certified standard agrees with decarboxylation kinetics (literature reviewed herein), which indicate contamination with THC is nearly unavoidable. THCA-A binding at 10μM approximated THC binding at 200nM. We therefore suspect some of our THCA-A binding curve was artifact-from its inevitable decarboxylation into THC-and the binding affinity of THCA-A is even weaker than our estimated values. We conclude that THCA-A has little affinity or efficacy at CB1 or CB2.
Authors: Kitty C M Verhoeckx; Henrie A A J Korthout; A P van Meeteren-Kreikamp; Karl A Ehlert; Mei Wang; Jan van der Greef; Richard J T Rodenburg; Renger F Witkamp Journal: Int Immunopharmacol Date: 2005-11-07 Impact factor: 4.932
Authors: Safwat A Ahmed; Samir A Ross; Desmond Slade; Mohamed M Radwan; Fazila Zulfiqar; Rae R Matsumoto; Yan-Tong Xu; Eddy Viard; Robert C Speth; Vardan T Karamyan; M A ElSohly Journal: J Nat Prod Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 4.050
Authors: Belén Palomares; Martín Garrido-Rodriguez; Claudia Gonzalo-Consuegra; María Gómez-Cañas; Suwipa Saen-Oon; Robert Soliva; Juan A Collado; Javier Fernández-Ruiz; Gaetano Morello; Marco A Calzado; Giovanni Appendino; Eduardo Muñoz Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Qingfang Meng; Beth Buchanan; Jonathan Zuccolo; Mathieu-Marc Poulin; Joseph Gabriele; David Charles Baranowski Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yi Yang; Rupali Vyawahare; Melissa Lewis-Bakker; Hance A Clarke; Albert H C Wong; Lakshmi P Kotra Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 4.411