Jarosław Paturej1,2,3, Sergei S Sheiko2, Sergey Panyukov4, Michael Rubinstein2. 1. Leibniz Institute of Polymer Research Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany. 2. Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290, USA. 3. Institute of Physics, University of Szczecin, 70451 Szczecin, Poland. 4. P.N. Lebedev Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 117924, Russia.
Abstract
Bottlebrushes are fascinating macromolecules that display an intriguing combination of molecular and particulate features having vital implications in both living and synthetic systems, such as cartilage and ultrasoft elastomers. However, the progress in practical applications is impeded by the lack of knowledge about the hierarchic organization of both individual bottlebrushes and their assemblies. We delineate fundamental correlations between molecular architecture, mesoscopic conformation, and macroscopic properties of polymer melts. Numerical simulations corroborate theoretical predictions for the effect of grafting density and side-chain length on the dimensions and rigidity of bottlebrushes, which effectively behave as a melt of flexible filaments. These findings provide quantitative guidelines for the design of novel materials that allow architectural tuning of their properties in a broad range without changing chemical composition.
Bottlebrushes are fascinating macromolecules that display an intriguing combination of molecular and particulate features having vital implications in both living and synthetic systems, such as cartilage and ultrasoft elastomers. However, the progress in practical applications is impeded by the lack of knowledge about the hierarchic organization of both individual bottlebrushes and their assemblies. We delineate fundamental correlations between molecular architecture, mesoscopic conformation, and macroscopic properties of polymer melts. Numerical simulations corroborate theoretical predictions for the effect of grafting density and side-chain length on the dimensions and rigidity of bottlebrushes, which effectively behave as a melt of flexible filaments. These findings provide quantitative guidelines for the design of novel materials that allow architectural tuning of their properties in a broad range without changing chemical composition.
Significant progress in polymerization techniques allows synthesis of hyperbranched
molecules with precisely controlled architectures (–). Dense branching results in distinct shape of
individual molecules and reduces overlap of neighboring molecules in dense systems
(concentrated solutions and melts). These unique features inspire the design of new
materials with physical properties that are different from properties of conventional
linear polymers. Branched macromolecules were explored as molecular pressure sensors
(), pH-sensitive probes
(), supersoft elastomers
(, ), and drug delivery agents (–). They have also been used as components for the
construction of mesoscopic systems () and controlling conformations of polymer chains ().One of the most distinct examples of highly branched macromolecules are molecular
bottlebrushes composed of many polymer side chains densely grafted to a linear chain
(backbone) (Fig. 1). The high grafting density
results in strong steric repulsion between the side chains, causing extension of the
backbone (–) and, in some cases, even
scission of its covalent bonds (, ). Because of this steric repulsion, bottlebrushes adapt a
wormlike conformation controlled by side-chain length and grafting density (). In bulk melts, this
conformation promotes reduction of entanglement density of the wormlike molecules (), resulting in unusual
rheological properties (,
) with an ultralow plateau
modulus of 102 to 103 Pa (, , ), which is much lower than the 105 to
106 Pa typically observed in melts of linear polymers. Note that these
fundamental changes in physical properties are achieved only through architectural
control without changing the chemical composition. Varying length and grafting density
of side chains allows for systematic control of conformation of individual molecules as
well as overlap and entanglements with neighboring molecules in dense systems.
Fig. 1
Molecular architecture and conformation of a bottlebrush polymer.
(A) Architecture of a bottlebrush molecule consisting of a backbone
with Nbb monomers (red beads) and z
side chains (blue beads) per backbone monomer. Each side chain is made of
Nsc monomers. The total number of monomers of
bottlebrush macromolecule is N =
Nbb(1 + zNsc). All beads
in the simulation are considered to be identical and interact via bonded and
nonbonded potential (see Materials and Methods for details). Here,
Nbb = 20, Nsc = 4, and
z = 2. (B) The bottlebrush molecule in a melt
state can be represented as a chain of effective persistence segments of length
and thickness Rsc.
R denotes end-to-end distance of bottlebrush backbone. Here,
Nbb = 150, Nsc = 10,
and z = 2.
Molecular architecture and conformation of a bottlebrush polymer.
(A) Architecture of a bottlebrush molecule consisting of a backbone
with Nbb monomers (red beads) and z
side chains (blue beads) per backbone monomer. Each side chain is made of
Nsc monomers. The total number of monomers of
bottlebrush macromolecule is N =
Nbb(1 + zNsc). All beads
in the simulation are considered to be identical and interact via bonded and
nonbonded potential (see Materials and Methods for details). Here,
Nbb = 20, Nsc = 4, and
z = 2. (B) The bottlebrush molecule in a melt
state can be represented as a chain of effective persistence segments of length
and thickness Rsc.
R denotes end-to-end distance of bottlebrush backbone. Here,
Nbb = 150, Nsc = 10,
and z = 2.Given their unique physical properties, molecular bottlebrushes have been an active
field for many theoretical (,
–), experimental (, , –), and numerical investigations (, , , , –). Most of these studies focused on basic structural
properties of bottlebrushes in solutions and in the adsorbed state. Particular attention
was paid to the bending rigidity of bottlebrush macromolecules, which is characterized
by the persistence length and remains a matter of debate in the scientific
literature. The major difficulty is the interplay between many length scales in the
bottlebrush structure and their impact on . Several theoretical approaches have been proposed to
address this problem using scaling analysis (, , , ) and the self-consistent field method (). For bottlebrushes in dilute
solutions, under good solvent conditions, the persistence length was predicted to scale
as , with α as low as () or as high as 1.11 () and (). The exponent α for bottlebrushes in a θ
solvent was predicted to be () or 1.01 (). Significantly less attention has been paid to
solvent-free systems (). Here,
we address the problem of architecture-induced increase of bottlebrush persistence
length as the key feature underlying physical properties of bottlebrush melts and
elastomers.In this work, we present the results of systematic coarse-grained molecular dynamics
simulations and scaling analysis of the equilibrium structure of bottlebrush polymer
melts for a range of degrees of polymerization of the backbone
Nbb, side chains Nsc, and
backbone spacer between the neighboring side chains. The latter is inversely
proportional to the grafting density z, which is the number of side
chains per backbone monomer. We show that the persistence length
for z = 1 and z = 2
bottlebrushes is on the order of the size of side chains and scales as . This finding suggests that the entanglement plateau
modulus of bottlebrush melts decreases as () , where Vperv is the volume
of the effective bottlebrush Kuhn segment proportional to the pervaded volume of a side
chain . The pervaded volume Vperv
of a side chain is the volume of a sphere that encompasses this side chain. Our results
also indicate that the backbones of bottlebrushes for z = 1 and
z = 2 in a melt state obey Gaussian statistics with their size
R (root mean square radius of gyration and end-to-end distance)
scaling as for Nbb ≫
Nsc. Furthermore, our molecular modeling provided vital
insights into the internal organization of bottlebrush melts, including limited
interpenetration of side chains of neighboring molecules, radial distribution function
of backbone monomers, and the form factor of individual bottlebrushes inside melt. We
conclude that bottlebrush melts behave as melts of thick and flexible filaments, with a
persistence length proportional to the size of the side chains.
RESULTS
Scaling theory of combs and bottlebrush molecules
Conformations of combs and bottlebrushes depend on the degree of polymerization of
the side chains Nsc and their grafting density
z. Although most of the paper concentrates on bottlebrushes with
z ≥ 1, in the present section, we consider a broader set
of parameters, including loosely grafted bottlebrushes (LBs) and loosely grafted
combs (LCs) with z < 1. Depending on grafting density, we
identify four conformational regimes of comb and bottlebrush melts (), depicted in Fig. 2. At lower grafting density, we distinguish
two comblike regimes characterized by Gaussian conformations of both backbone and
side chains: (i) loosely grafted combs (LCs) with long backbone spacers between side
chains z < 1/Nsc and with strongly
interpenetrating neighboring molecules and (ii) densely grafted combs (DCs) for
1/Nsc < z < z*
with weak interpenetration between molecules, where z* is defined in
Eq. 1 below. There are also two
regimes at higher grafting density: (iii) loosely grafted bottlebrushes (LBs) with
extended backbones and Gaussian side chains for intermediate grafting density
z* < z < z** and (iv)
densely grafted bottlebrushes (DBs) with extended backbones and side chains for high
grafting density of side chains z > z**, where
z** is defined in Eq.
3 below. The boundary between the comb and bottlebrush regimes can be found
from the space-filling condition of zNsc side chains with
physical volume vNsc, each within their pervaded volume
(blNsc)3/2, resulting in reduced
interpenetration of side chains from neighboring moleculeswhere b is the Kuhn
length, l is the monomer length, and v is the
monomer volume. The present paper focuses on the melts of densely grafted
bottlebrushes, whereas below we briefly review conformations of other types of
molecules.
Fig. 2
Diagram of states of combs and bottlebrush molecules.
Molecular conformations are determined by the degree of polymerization
Nsc of side chains (blue circles) and the number
z of side chains per backbone monomer (red circles). Four
conformational regimes are distinguished: LC like polymer with
z < 1/Nsc, DC with
1/Nsc < z <
z*, LB with z* < z
< z**, and DB with z >
z** (see Eqs. 1 and 3 for the
definitions of z* and z**). The solid lines
indicate crossovers between regimes [green, LC-DC boundary at
z ≈ 1/Nsc; blue, DC-LB
crossover line at ; red, LB-DB boundary at z**
(see Eq. 3)].
Diagram of states of combs and bottlebrush molecules.
Molecular conformations are determined by the degree of polymerization
Nsc of side chains (blue circles) and the number
z of side chains per backbone monomer (red circles). Four
conformational regimes are distinguished: LC like polymer with
z < 1/Nsc, DC with
1/Nsc < z <
z*, LB with z* < z
< z**, and DB with z >
z** (see Eqs. 1 and 3 for the
definitions of z* and z**). The solid lines
indicate crossovers between regimes [green, LC-DC boundary at
z ≈ 1/Nsc; blue, DC-LB
crossover line at ; red, LB-DB boundary at z**
(see Eq. 3)].The low grafting density regime with z < z*
(combs) includes two subregimes: LC and DC. Loosely grafted combs (LC part of Fig. 2), with spacers between side chains longer
than the side chains (z < 1/Nsc) and
a high volume fraction of backbones (> 50%), fully interpenetrate each other in
melts. Densely grafted combs (DC part of Fig.
2), with spacers shorter than the side chains
1/Nsc < z <
z*, allow only partial interpenetration of the side chains because
there is not enough space to accommodate side chains of neighboring molecules near
the backbone of a host molecule. Both the side chains and backbones in melts of combs
(LC and DC regimes) are in almost unperturbed Gaussian conformations.Macromolecules with z > z* correspond to the
so-called bottlebrush regime, which onsets because of a lack of space for side chains
emanating from the unperturbed Gaussian backbone. Interpenetration of these side
chains without their significant deformation is only possible upon extension of the
backbone. We can estimate z* (Eq. 1) by considering a side chain with an unperturbed Gaussian size
and with pervaded volume . This pervaded volume can only fit
side chains, each with a physical volume
Vsc ≈ vNsc. A
section of the backbone of size passing through this pervaded volume contains
Nsc monomers if it is in its unperturbed Gaussian
conformation (assuming the same conformational statistics of backbone and side
chains). Therefore, if grafting density is too high (z >
z*), the Nscz side
chains grafted to the undeformed section of the backbone with combined physical
volume can no longer fit in the pervaded volume
Vperv, forcing the backbone to extend.The backbone extension on the length scale assures a fixed number of grafting points along the
backbone section of this size equal to the number of overlapping side chains
. On the small length scales, up to the size of the
tension blob (), the
backbone remains unperturbed. The size of the tension blob ξ ≈
(blg)1/2 consisting of g monomers is
estimated from the condition that gz side chains emanated from this
section of the backbone densely fill its pervaded volume ξ3 [there
are ξ3/(vg) ≈ gz such
overlapping chain sections]. Therefore, the tension blob size is ξ ≈
(lb)2/(vz). There is no crowding
issue on length scales r smaller than the tension blob
(r < ξ), and bottlebrush backbones maintain the
unperturbed Gaussian conformations with bare Kuhn length b. On the
intermediate length scales (), a backbone can be visualized as an extended array
of tension blobs with a constant average distance between grafting points
v/(bl). On larger length scales
(), backbones of bottlebrushes in a melt are
represented as random walks of these extended arrays of tension blobs. The loosely
grafted bottlebrush (LB part of Fig. 2) is
described as a thick filament with contour length L ≈
Nbbvz/(bl),
thickness equal to the end-to-end distance of its side chains
, and persistence length on the same order of
magnitude (see detailed derivation in the subsection “Persistence length of a
bottlebrush in a melt”). Thus, bottlebrush macromolecules are considered as
chains of effective monomers of size . The mean square end-to-end distance of the backbone
of an LBincreases with increasing degree of
polymerization Nsc and grafting density
z of side chains. Considering bottlebrush as a dense
“sausage-like” random walk, we can estimate its mean square size from
its physical volume Vchain ≈
vzNbbNsc as
.Side chains begin to extend at the crossover between loosely grafted and densely
grafted bottlebrush regimes (red line in Fig. 2
at z ≈ z**). The crossover value of the
grafting density is given byThis crossover occurs either if the backbone spacer between neighboring grafting
points begins to extend (for v >
b2l) or if the backbone approached
the fully extended state (for v <
b2l). In the former case at
z ≈ z** ≈
(bl)3/v2, the scale
associated with the tension blob of the backbone ξ ≈
(lb)2/(vz) becomes comparable to the
unperturbed spacer size (bl/z)1/2. At
high grafting density (z** < z <
l3/2/v1/2), the balance of
side chain and backbone spacer stretching leads to the equilibrium size of extended
side chains , with the corresponding average spacer length
(v/z)1/3 and the contour length of
the bottlebrush Lbb ≈
v1/3z2/3Nbb.
The mean square size of the bottlebrush in this regime isThe backbone is almost fully stretched in the case of lower monomer volume
v < b2l if
z > z** ≈
(l2b)/v or, for
higher grafting density, z >
l3/2/v1/2 in the case of
higher monomer volume v >
b2l. In this case, the dense packing
of side chains forces them to extend to the mean square sizeThe filament-like bottlebrush with both thickness and persistence length on the order
of and bottlebrush contour length on the order of the
contour of the backbone lNbb has mean square
sizeThe dependence of backbone and side-chain size of combs and bottlebrushes on
z is summarized in Fig.
3.
Fig. 3
Size of combs and bottlebrushes in different regimes.
With increasing grafting density, the dimensions of both backbone
〈R2〉1/2 (red solid
line) and side chain (blue dashed line) undergo characteristic
variations in the comb (LC and DC) and bottlebrush (LB and DB) regimes. This
figure corresponds to the case of lower monomer volume v <
b2l. Abbreviations are the same
as in Fig. 2. In addition,
, , R3 ≡
(blNbb)1/2, , and R5 ≡
(blNsc)1/2.
Size of combs and bottlebrushes in different regimes.
With increasing grafting density, the dimensions of both backbone
〈R2〉1/2 (red solid
line) and side chain (blue dashed line) undergo characteristic
variations in the comb (LC and DC) and bottlebrush (LB and DB) regimes. This
figure corresponds to the case of lower monomer volume v <
b2l. Abbreviations are the same
as in Fig. 2. In addition,
, , R3 ≡
(blNbb)1/2, , and R5 ≡
(blNsc)1/2.
The size of side chains of densely grafted bottlebrushes with almost fully
stretched backbones
The size of side chains increases with degree of polymerization
Nsc (see fig. S1 and table S1). Their size also
increases with grafting density z along the backbone. This effect is
illustrated in Fig. 4A, which exhibits the
variation of the ratio of the mean square distance of side-chain monomer s from the
grafting point and the corresponding Gaussian size
sσ2 as a function of the bond index
s for different grafting densities z. Different
colors and symbols correspond to bottlebrushes with different values of
Nbb, N, and z, as shown in Fig.
4B and table S2. To understand the bond index s dependence of the
mean square distance , we consider the average of the square of the size
Rsc(s) =
〈Rsc(s)〉 +
δRsc(s) of these side-chain
segments containing s monomers
Fig. 4
Size of side chains of bottlebrushes in a melt.
(A) Dependence of the rescaled values of the mean square distance
of a side-chain monomer s from the grafting point
for side chains with
Nsc = 10 and Nsc =
16 monomers as a function of the bond index s counting from
the grafting point for molecules with different number z of
grafted side chains per backbone monomer. The mean square fluctuations of the
size of an s-segment are assumed to be equal to their value for
linear 16-mer in a melt (z = 0, crosses). The dashed line is
the fit to these z = 0 points by with two adjustable parameters
and . Curves for z ≥ 1 show
theoretical predictions of Eq.
10 with fitting parameter
〈Rsc〉. (Inset) Dependence of
〈Rsc〉2/(Nscσ2)
on parameter z for
〈Rsc〉 obtained from the separate fit
to Eq. 10 for each curve. Dashed
line represents the theoretical prediction of Eq. 11 with scaling parameter
Csc = 0.17. (B) Convention of
symbols used in all figures to denote a particular bottlebrush melt. Color and
shape of symbols denote the values of Nbb and
Nsc, respectively. Crosses represent the data
for linear chains (z = 0), solid symbols correspond to
bottlebrushes with z = 1, open symbols are for bottlebrushes
with z = 2, and plus symbols denote the data for bottlebrushes
with z = 4 (see table S2 for more details). (C)
Dependence of the rescaled values
〈Rsc(s)〉/(sz1/2σ)
of the corresponding mean distance on the bond index s. Dashed
lines are the theoretical predictions (see text for details).
Size of side chains of bottlebrushes in a melt.
(A) Dependence of the rescaled values of the mean square distance
of a side-chain monomer s from the grafting point
for side chains with
Nsc = 10 and Nsc =
16 monomers as a function of the bond index s counting from
the grafting point for molecules with different number z of
grafted side chains per backbone monomer. The mean square fluctuations of the
size of an s-segment are assumed to be equal to their value for
linear 16-mer in a melt (z = 0, crosses). The dashed line is
the fit to these z = 0 points by with two adjustable parameters
and . Curves for z ≥ 1 show
theoretical predictions of Eq.
10 with fitting parameter
〈Rsc〉. (Inset) Dependence of
〈Rsc〉2/(Nscσ2)
on parameter z for
〈Rsc〉 obtained from the separate fit
to Eq. 10 for each curve. Dashed
line represents the theoretical prediction of Eq. 11 with scaling parameter
Csc = 0.17. (B) Convention of
symbols used in all figures to denote a particular bottlebrush melt. Color and
shape of symbols denote the values of Nbb and
Nsc, respectively. Crosses represent the data
for linear chains (z = 0), solid symbols correspond to
bottlebrushes with z = 1, open symbols are for bottlebrushes
with z = 2, and plus symbols denote the data for bottlebrushes
with z = 4 (see table S2 for more details). (C)
Dependence of the rescaled values
〈Rsc(s)〉/(sz1/2σ)
of the corresponding mean distance on the bond index s. Dashed
lines are the theoretical predictions (see text for details).We assume that the nontrivial s dependence of
observed in Fig.
4A is due to chain extension
〈Rsc(s)〉, whereas the
fluctuations of the size of these s-segments can
be described by the mean square size of chain sections containing s
monomers of a free linear 16-mer (z = 0, red crosses).For monomers near the free ends of side chains, the mean distance
〈Rsc(s)〉 can be
expanded in the Taylor series of the variable 1 −
s/Nsc:where
〈Rsc〉 =
〈Rsc(Nsc)〉
is the average size of a side chain. The first coefficient is
a1 = 0 due to the boundary condition
dRsc/ds = 0 at the free end
s = Nsc. The condition
〈Rsc(s)〉 ≪
〈Rsc〉 for small s
≪ Nsc leads to the constraint for the sum of all
coefficients
∑a
= −1. Note that the asymptotic expressions for the higher-order coefficients
a in Eq. 8 can be found by expanding the dependence
〈Rsc(s)〉 ∝
(s/Nsc)1/2 = [1 −
(1 − s/Nsc)]1/2 (see
Eq. 14 below) in the power series
of (1 − s/Nsc). Comparing this
expansion with expansion in Eq. 8 term
by term, we estimate a3 ≈ −1/16 and
coefficients a decay with
n as n−3/2. The small values
of these coefficients justify omission of the higher-order terms in the expansion in
Eq. 8. Thus, we take all
a = 0 and
a2 = −1 and obtainThe parameter γ ~ 0.3 to 0.5 defines the lower boundary of the interval of
validity of the above approximation. The mean square size of linear chain segments
containing s monomers obtained from molecular dynamics simulations is
presented by the lowest set of points denoted by × symbols in Fig. 4A. This dependence can be approximated by
, where and , as shown by the dashed line (see Eq. 22 below for the similar
approximation for bottlebrush backbones). In Fig.
4A, we compare our prediction from Eqs. 7 and 9with the data obtained from
simulations of bottlebrushes with grafting density z = 1, 2, and 4
using single fitting parameter 〈Rsc〉 and
the value of and from the fit to linear chain data (z
= 0). This simple estimate (Eq. 10)
demonstrates excellent agreement with the simulation data.The average side-chain size 〈Rsc〉 can be
estimated from the monomer dense packing condition. The transverse slice of a
bottlebrush can be approximated by a disc of volume
d〈Rsc〉2 and
thickness d ≈ σ of the backbone bond projection onto
the contour of the molecule. Assuming that there is no (or limited) overlap between
the side chains of neighboring bottlebrushes, the disc volume is occupied by
z side chains of volume vNsc each,
where v ≈ σ3 is the volume of one monomer.
Therefore, the square of the average size of side chains can be estimated
aswhere Csc
is the numerical coefficient accounting for the scaling form of this expression. The
inset in Fig. 4A shows good agreement with Eq. 11, with the value of the fitting
parameter Csc = 0.17.Combining Eqs. 9 and 11, we can writeIn Fig. 4C, we test this prediction by plotting
the s dependence of the ratio of the average distance
and
sσz1/2 using the simulation
data presented in Fig. 4A. For larger values of
s for γNsc ≲
s ≤ Nsc, this rescaled
function is z-independent and exhibits linear dependence on
s, , with Nsc-dependent
negative slope predicted by Eq. 12.
The red and black dashed lines in Fig. 4C (for
s > 6) have slopes of −0.012 and −0.0064 for
Nsc = 10 and Nsc = 16,
respectively, which are consistent with the predicted negative slopes
and −0.0063 from Eq. 12.The mean square fluctuations of the size of chain segments containing large number
s ≫ 1 of monomers are Gaussian. Therefore, the normalized
mean square size of side-chain segments (Eq.
10) can be approximated for large s byThis equation predicts a maximum at smax =
2Nsc/3. This prediction is in good agreement with the
simulations (see Fig. 4A). Note that the
position of the maximum (for both points and lines) has a slightly higher value of
s than 2Nsc/3 because of the residual
s dependence of the ratio for short side chains. The physical explanation of
this peak is that not all of the chains extend all the way to
〈Rsc〉. There is a wide distribution of
the positions of side-chain ends around their average value
〈Rsc〉. Because fewer side chains extend
to larger radial distances from the backbone, they provide an additional contribution
to the ratio in Eq.
13 for γNsc < s <
smax and a relatively smaller contribution for larger
values of s > smax. As a result of
side chains that do not extend to large radial distances from the backbone, the
crowding of remaining side chains at these large radial distances decreases. This
decrease in crowding weakens the stretching of the remote side-chain sections,
resulting in a relatively smaller average extension of chain sections with
s > 2Nsc/3. The stretching
decreases with s and vanishes at the free side-chain ends in the
overlapping zone of neighboring bottlebrushes.Conformations of side-chain segments with s ≲
γNsc near the grafting point are determined by
the monomer packing condition due to the limited penetration of monomers with index
s′ > s into this zone near the
backbone, similar to packing restrictions for the entire side chain (see Eq. 11)Therefore, the ratio
〈Rsc(s)〉/(sσz1/2)
should be independent of Nsc for small s
≲ γNsc, as observed in Fig. 4C. However, note that the s dependence of
〈Rsc(s)〉 for
s ≲ 6 differs from our prediction (Eq. 14) because of strong crowding of
side-chains near the backbone and the non-Gaussian behavior of these short chain
segments. The s dependence of significantly deviates from a constant for
s ≲ 6 (see red crosses in Fig. 4A), as described by the crossover expression
.
Persistence length of a bottlebrush in a melt
The rigidity of bottlebrush is only due to the mutual repulsion of the crowded side
chains. The excluded volume interactions in a melt state are highly screened. In the
unrealistic case of complete screening of steric interactions, the resulting
persistence length of a bottlebrush is on the order of its monomer size ≈
σ. To estimate the persistence length of “real” bottlebrushes,
we have to account for partially screened excluded volume interactions between side
chains. The physical volume of spz side
chains grafted to a persistent bottlebrush section is
vspzNsc, whereas the
radius of this section is . Therefore, the length of this cylindrical-like
section is and its pervaded volume is . The pervaded volume of a persistent bottlebrush
section is the volume of a sphere that encompasses this cylindrical-like persistent
segment. The excluded volume interactions between polymer sections in the melt are
reduced by the degree of polymerization Pw =
spzNsc of these sections
() see Fig. 5. Thus, the free energy of the excluded
volume interactions between these persistent bottlebrush sections within their
pervaded volume is
Fig. 5
Geometry of a bottlebrush polymer.
A bottlebrush is composed of z side chains with
Nsc monomers each grafted to every backbone
monomer (z = 2 in this figure).
Rsc ≡
Rsc(Nsc) and
Rsc(s) denote instantaneous
values of size of side chains (bottlebrush thickness) and distance of a
side-chain monomer s from the grafting point, respectively.
The number of monomers per persistence segment is
sp, and persistence length is
. Pw ≈
spzNsc is the total
degree of polymerization of cylindrical-like section composed of
sp backbone monomers and
spzNsc side-chain
monomers. d is average projection of a backbone bond onto the
direction of the backbone contour.
Geometry of a bottlebrush polymer.
A bottlebrush is composed of z side chains with
Nsc monomers each grafted to every backbone
monomer (z = 2 in this figure).
Rsc ≡
Rsc(Nsc) and
Rsc(s) denote instantaneous
values of size of side chains (bottlebrush thickness) and distance of a
side-chain monomer s from the grafting point, respectively.
The number of monomers per persistence segment is
sp, and persistence length is
. Pw ≈
spzNsc is the total
degree of polymerization of cylindrical-like section composed of
sp backbone monomers and
spzNsc side-chain
monomers. d is average projection of a backbone bond onto the
direction of the backbone contour.The persistent segment sp is determined by the condition
that the excluded volume interaction energy Esc is on the
order of thermal energy kBT, resulting
inwhere Eq. 11
was used. In this case, the size of the persistence
segment isThe conformations of bottlebrush backbones at small length scales are similar to
those of flexible polyelectrolytes that are almost undeformed on scales up to
electrostatic blob size but extended into a linear array of electrostatic blobs on
larger length scales with persistence length determined by the screening length
(). By analogy with the
polyelectrolytes, bottlebrushes are flexible on small length scales and have large
persistence length, induced by side-chain repulsion, on intermediate length
scales.Our simulations confirm the scaling prediction that the persistence length of
bottlebrush backbones in a melt state is comparable to the size of side chains. To
determine the length of persistence segments sp, we
calculated the decay rate of the correlations between bond orientations
(see simulation data in Fig. 6A and fig. S2). The cosine of the angle is cos θ =
(r/|r|)
⋅
(r/|r|),
where is the bond vector
i between monomers i and i + 1,
and is the
bond vector i + s between monomers
i + s and i +
s + 1. The data obtained from simulations (symbols) have been
fitted to the function (dashed lines) of the following formwhere A,
sf, s,
and ζ are fitting parameters (see table S3) and denote the following: (1
− A) and A are the magnitudes of short- and
long-range correlations, respectively, between bond vectors of the backbone;
sf is the characteristic number of beads in the
backbone, which undergo “local” bond vector correlations;
sp is the number of beads per persistence segment; and
ζ is the magnitude of long-range interactions induced by the connectivity of
backbone bonds (see the section on persistence length in the Supplementary Materials
for details). The power-law decay ∝ s−3/2
at s ≫ 1 was reported for polymers melts () and for θ solutions
(). The origin of these
interactions is explained either by effective compression of polymer coils due to the
correlation hole effect ()
or by the shift of the monomeric Mayer f-function due to the finite
interaction range and chain connectivity (). The function tanh
[(s/3)3] present in Eq. 18 describes a cutoff at minimal loop size s
= 3.
Fig. 6
Persistence segment of a bottlebrush in a melt.
(A) Decay of backbone bond orientational correlations
g(s) as a function of the number of
monomers s between two bonds for bottlebrushes with various
degrees of polymerization Nsc of side chains and
number z of side chains grafted per backbone monomer (see
Fig. 4B and the corresponding caption
for the definition of symbols). Dashed lines represent best fits to the
expression for g(s) given by Eq. 18. (B)
Persistence segments obtained from the decay of bond orientational correlations
plotted as a function of the side-chain polymerization degree
Nsc for various backbones
Nbb and grafting densities z of
side chains, as indicated. The dashed lines represent the best power-law fit
for data sets with Nbb = 100:
for z = 1 and
for z = 2.
Persistence segment of a bottlebrush in a melt.
(A) Decay of backbone bond orientational correlations
g(s) as a function of the number of
monomers s between two bonds for bottlebrushes with various
degrees of polymerization Nsc of side chains and
number z of side chains grafted per backbone monomer (see
Fig. 4B and the corresponding caption
for the definition of symbols). Dashed lines represent best fits to the
expression for g(s) given by Eq. 18. (B)
Persistence segments obtained from the decay of bond orientational correlations
plotted as a function of the side-chain polymerization degree
Nsc for various backbones
Nbb and grafting densities z of
side chains, as indicated. The dashed lines represent the best power-law fit
for data sets with Nbb = 100:
for z = 1 and
for z = 2.In Fig. 6B, the number of monomers along the
bottlebrush backbone in the persistent segment sp is
presented as a function of the degree of polymerization of side chains
Nsc for grafting densities z = 1 and
2 and various backbone degrees of polymerization Nbb.
These data demonstrate the effect of backbone straightening with the increasing
Nsc and z. The exponents of the
observed power lawsagree with the exponent
predicted from the scaling arguments, as presented in
the beginning of this subsection (see Eq.
16), and indicate that the number of monomers
sp in the persistence segments of the bottlebrush
backbones with z = 1 or 2 side chain per backbone monomer and
Nbb ≳ 50 is proportional to the brush radius
(side-chain size ) (see fig. S3).
Size of a bottlebrush in a melt
The size of a bottlebrush in a melt state can be estimated from a simple physical
picture of nonoverlapping flexible filaments with . Consider a bottlebrush backbone that is much longer
than persistence segment Nbb ≫
sp (see Fig. 1B).
The bottlebrush conformation can be represented as a chain of effective monomers
consisting of sp backbone monomers and
spz side chains of size
. The mean square end-to-end distance of the backbone
can be estimated as the number of these effective monomers
Nbb/sp times the square of
their size, which is proportional to the mean square size of side chains
, resulting in . Because the number of monomers in a persistence
segment sp is proportional to the size of a side chain
(see Eqs.
17, 19, and 20), we predict that the mean square size
of the backbone is also proportional to the size of a side chain
. Our simulation results corroborate this prediction
(cf. Eq. 6), as discussed below.The mean square end-to-end distance of the backbone
〈R2〉 and the mean square radius of
gyration of the whole bottlebrush are plotted as functions of
the degree of polymerization of side chains Nsc and
backbone Nbb in Fig.
7 and fig. S4 (for the definition of symbols, see Fig. 4B and the corresponding caption as well as table S2). The
mean square size increases with Nbb and
Nsc and obeys the power lawand for z = 1 and
for z = 2. Similar to linear chains
in melts, the conformations of bottlebrushes with long backbones are well described
by the ideal chain statistics, that is, , as verified by the distributions of the end-to-end
distances R and the radii of gyration Rg
(cf. fig. S5). From Fig. 7A, one can observe
that the mean square end-to-end distance of molecules with backbones
Nbb = 10 and 20 becomes insensitive to further
increase in Nsc. This is attributed to the crossover from
the crew-cut bottlebrushes to the starlike configurations.
Fig. 7
Size of bottlebrushes in a melt.
Mean square end-to-end distance 〈R2〉
(A) and mean square radius of gyration
(including side chains) (B) of
bottlebrushes in a melt normalized by the ideal mean square size of backbones
Nbbσ2 as functions of the
degree of polymerization of side chains Nsc.
(C) Mean square radius of gyration of bottlebrushes normalized by σ times
the ideal root mean square size of side chains as a function of the degree of polymerization
of backbones Nbb. See Fig. 4B and the corresponding caption for the definition of symbols.
In (A) and (B), the number of side chains grafted per backbone monomer is
z = 1 and 2. (C) displays data for z = 2.
Dashed lines represent fitted scaling laws: (A) for z = 1 and
Nbb = 100 and for z = 2 and
Nbb = 100, (B) for z = 1 and
Nbb = 100 and for z = 2 and
Nbb = 100, and (C) for z = 2 and
Nsc = 10. The error bars for all data points are
smaller than the size of symbols.
Size of bottlebrushes in a melt.
Mean square end-to-end distance 〈R2〉
(A) and mean square radius of gyration
(including side chains) (B) of
bottlebrushes in a melt normalized by the ideal mean square size of backbones
Nbbσ2 as functions of the
degree of polymerization of side chains Nsc.
(C) Mean square radius of gyration of bottlebrushes normalized by σ times
the ideal root mean square size of side chains as a function of the degree of polymerization
of backbones Nbb. See Fig. 4B and the corresponding caption for the definition of symbols.
In (A) and (B), the number of side chains grafted per backbone monomer is
z = 1 and 2. (C) displays data for z = 2.
Dashed lines represent fitted scaling laws: (A) for z = 1 and
Nbb = 100 and for z = 2 and
Nbb = 100, (B) for z = 1 and
Nbb = 100 and for z = 2 and
Nbb = 100, and (C) for z = 2 and
Nsc = 10. The error bars for all data points are
smaller than the size of symbols.The mean square internal distances
〈R2(s)〉 between
backbone monomers are plotted in Fig. 8 as a
function of the number of bonds s in a backbone section for
molecules with various side-chain degrees of polymerization
Nsc and different number z of side
chains grafted per backbone monomer (the definition of symbols is displayed in Fig. 4B and described in the corresponding
caption). The simulation data for all z values were fitted to the
crossover expressionwith fitting parameters
and plotted in Fig.
8B and reported in table S4. The overall good agreement between the
crossover expression and simulation data is observed by the overlap between points
(simulation data) and lines (Eq. 22)
in Fig. 8A. The backbone stretching
(characterized by both parameters and ) increases significantly with the grafting density of
side chains z and with the degree of polymerization of side chains
Nsc because of steric repulsion between densely
grafted side chains. The Flory characteristic ratio and parameter increase proportionally to the power of the degree of
polymerization of side chains and for z = 1 and
and for z = 2 (see Fig. 8B and table S4). The scaling exponents are close to
, indicating that s dependence of
distances between backbone bonds separated by s monomers for
is consistent with the backbone size scaling (Eq. 21). We observe that
is 60% and 25% larger than corresponding
values (see Fig.
8B and table S4) for z = 1 and 2, respectively, pointing
out the wiggling of the backbone
〈R2(s)〉1/2
≈ s1/2 σ on length scales smaller than the
tension blob. The bottlebrushes undergo a conformational transformation from a random
coil to a rod as the grafting density z increases from 1 to 4, which
is evidenced by the increase of both the Flory characteristic ratio
and the crossover value by more than an order of magnitude. Because the
backbone degree of polymerization , the simulated bottlebrush with side-chain grafting
density z = 4 is effectively rodlike. Note that it is hardly
possible to determine persistence segment sp from
correlations of bond orientations (see Eq.
18) for simulated bottlebrushes with short backbones
Nbb ≲ 50 and z = 4 because the
corresponding g(s) functions do not decay
sufficiently.
Fig. 8
Extension of a bottlebrush in a melt.
(A) Dependence of the mean square internal distances
〈R2(s)〉 between
bottlebrush backbone monomers normalized by their ideal mean square size
sσ2 on the number of monomers
s in the backbone sections plotted for various side-chain
polymerization degrees Nsc and grafting densities
z (see Fig. 4B and its
caption for the definition of symbols). Solid lines represent best fits to the
crossover expression , with fitting parameters
and listed in table S4. (B) Fitting
parameters and plotted as a function of side-chain
polymerization degree Nsc for z =
1 (full symbols) and z = 2 (open symbols). Dashed lines
represent fitted scaling laws: and for z = 1, whereas
and for z = 2.
Extension of a bottlebrush in a melt.
(A) Dependence of the mean square internal distances
〈R2(s)〉 between
bottlebrush backbone monomers normalized by their ideal mean square size
sσ2 on the number of monomers
s in the backbone sections plotted for various side-chain
polymerization degrees Nsc and grafting densities
z (see Fig. 4B and its
caption for the definition of symbols). Solid lines represent best fits to the
crossover expression , with fitting parameters
and listed in table S4. (B) Fitting
parameters and plotted as a function of side-chain
polymerization degree Nsc for z =
1 (full symbols) and z = 2 (open symbols). Dashed lines
represent fitted scaling laws: and for z = 1, whereas
and for z = 2.
Interpenetration of neighboring bottlebrushes in a melt
As discussed below, reduced interpenetration of side chains from neighboring
macromolecules is a distinct feature that distinguishes segregated filaments
(bottlebrushes) from overlapped molecules (linear chains and combs). This
interpenetration is crucial for the understanding of the friction between these
molecules and for the explanation of the complex rheological response of
bottlebrush-based materials observed in recent experiments (, , , , ). We have analyzed the number of intramolecular
and intermolecular
g contacts between side-chain
monomers. Contacts were defined between pairs of monomers within distance
rshell = 1.5σ from each other. This separation
corresponds to the position of the minimum in the interbead correlation function
g(r), as discussed below. We denote by
〈h〉 the average number
of intramolecular nonbonded contacts between sth monomer of a side
chain and monomers within the same host molecule, whereas
〈g〉 stands for the
average number of intermolecular contacts between the ith monomer of
a side chain of a given molecule with monomers belonging to all other molecules. Both
quantities were calculated as functions of monomer index s along a
side chain and normalized by the average number of nonbonded neighbors per
sth monomer Z =
〈h〉 +
〈g〉. The average value
of Z is independent of the monomer
index s, Z ≈
〈Z〉 ≈ 4.7, except for terminal monomers
Z1 ≈ 5.0 and . The results of this analysis are presented in Fig. 9A (for the definition of symbols, see Fig. 4B and the corresponding caption as well as
table S2). The average fraction of intermolecular contacts for the first side-chain
monomers (s = 1) is low and decreases with increasing grafting
density z:
〈g1〉/〈Z1〉
≈ 0.2 for z = 1,
〈g1〉/〈Z1〉
≈ 0.1 for z = 2, and
〈g1〉/〈Z1〉
< 0.01 for z = 4. The limited interpenetration is ascribed to
dense crowding of the side-chain monomers belonging to the same bottlebrush in the
vicinity of its backbone, which hinders penetration of guest monomers to the central
region of the host bottlebrush. The probability of encountering guest monomers
〈g〉/〈Z〉
increases with s and reaches the maximum value for terminal monomers
of the side chains. This maximum value was found to be independent of grafting density z
and degree of polymerization of side chains Nsc. The
terminal monomers are in the interpenetration zone between two neighboring
bottlebrushes. This zone contains 50:50 composition of monomers from both molecules.
The low interpenetration of bottlebrushes in a melt state is demonstrated by the
“territorial map” (–) of the simulation box snapshot in Fig. 9B.
Fig. 9
Interpenetration of bottlebrushes in a melt.
(A) Average number of contacts
〈g〉 between
bottlebrush side-chain monomer s and monomers of other
molecules. The value of
〈g〉 is normalized
by the average number of nonbonded neighbors
〈Z〉 and
plotted as a function of monomer index i (counting from the
backbone) normalized by the degree of polymerization of side chains
Nsc. Data for Nsc =
10 and Nsc = 16, with grafting density
z = 1, 2, and 4 of side chains per backbone monomer (see
Fig. 4B and the corresponding caption
for the definition of symbols). The inset displays the average number of
contacts 〈g〉
between sth monomer of a linear chain and monomers of
surrounding linear chains in a melt normalized by the average number of
nonbonded neighbors. (B) The “map of territories”
for an equilibrated melt of bottlebrushes with Nbb
= 100, Nsc = 10, and z = 2
demonstrates reduced overlap between neighboring molecules.
Interpenetration of bottlebrushes in a melt.
(A) Average number of contacts
〈g〉 between
bottlebrush side-chain monomer s and monomers of other
molecules. The value of
〈g〉 is normalized
by the average number of nonbonded neighbors
〈Z〉 and
plotted as a function of monomer index i (counting from the
backbone) normalized by the degree of polymerization of side chains
Nsc. Data for Nsc =
10 and Nsc = 16, with grafting density
z = 1, 2, and 4 of side chains per backbone monomer (see
Fig. 4B and the corresponding caption
for the definition of symbols). The inset displays the average number of
contacts 〈g〉
between sth monomer of a linear chain and monomers of
surrounding linear chains in a melt normalized by the average number of
nonbonded neighbors. (B) The “map of territories”
for an equilibrated melt of bottlebrushes with Nbb
= 100, Nsc = 10, and z = 2
demonstrates reduced overlap between neighboring molecules.For a reference system, we have calculated the number of contacts between monomers of
neighboring linear chains in a melt (cf. the inset of Fig. 9A). The interchain contacts for linear polymers are almost uniformly
distributed along the backbone except for the chain ends. The estimated fraction of
guest monomers for linear chains was found to be
〈g〉/〈Z〉
≈ 0.65 (independent of the degree of polymerization) and is higher than the
maximum fraction of 0.5 (encountered by end monomers of bottlebrush side chains). The
increase in the fraction of intermolecular contacts of up to ≈ 0.78 is
observed at the ends of linear chains. The intrachain nonbonded contacts in linear
chains are due to the formation of self-loops. For inner monomers of a linear chain,
one can have self-loops at both sides, whereas for end monomers, self-loops can only
be formed from one side. This explains the higher number of interchain contacts for
end monomers of linear chains in a melt. The main conclusion of this analysis is that
the overlap of bottlebrush molecules in the melt is qualitatively different on a
monomer level from that of linear chains. Below, we show that melts of bottlebrushes
become qualitatively similar to those of linear chains if we describe bottlebrushes
as thick flexible filaments, which are chains of “effective monomers”
of size .
Local structure
The internal structure of melts composed of linear chains or bottlebrushes is
illustrated in Fig. 10 by the pair correlation
functions g(r) of backbone monomers. The
intrabackbone pair correlation function
gintra(r) has several peaks, as shown
in Fig. 10A, for both linear chains and
bottlebrush melts with different side-chain grafting densities z.
There are two peaks in melts of bottlebrushes with short side chains: one at
r ≈ 0.96 σ that corresponds to bonded (nearest)
neighbors and the peak at r ≈ 1.87 σ that corresponds
to second-nearest neighbors. As the degree of polymerization of side chains
Nsc increases, one observes that, for the grafting
density of z = 2 side chains per backbone monomer (solid lines), new
peaks appear at r ≈ 2.6 σ and 3.4 σ, which are
due to stretching of the backbone. As the number of side chains attached to a
backbone monomer increases to z = 4 (dashed line), the backbone
stiffens and more peaks appear, indicating stronger intramolecular correlations. In
this case, a series of clearly distinguishable subsequent and equidistant maxima is
observed: 1.92σ, 2.79σ, 3.63σ, 4.48σ, 5.32σ,
… The existence of local structure for bottlebrush melts is due to long-range
interactions between backbone monomers induced by side chains. The strength of the
intramolecular interaction increases with grafting density z and
with length of side chains. The longer the side chains are, the stronger the
interaction is between backbone monomers and the longer the range of these
interactions is. The interaction range along the backbone is comparable to the size
of the persistence segment, which scales with the size of side chains as
.
Fig. 10
Radial distribution function of bottlebrushes in a melt.
Pair correlation functions between (A) intrabackbone monomers
gintra(r) and (B)
interbackbone monomers ginter(r)
normalized by melt density ρ and density of backbone monomers in a melt
ρbb, respectively. Correlation functions were plotted for
various degrees of polymerization of side chains
Nsc. As indicated in the legend, various colors
are used to distinguish between the lines with different values of
Nsc. Solid gray lines denote results for linear
melts, that is, with grafting density z = 0
(Nsc = 0), whereas other solid lines correspond
to z = 2. Dashed lines represent results for
z = 4 and Nsc = 10.
Radial distribution function of bottlebrushes in a melt.
Pair correlation functions between (A) intrabackbone monomers
gintra(r) and (B)
interbackbone monomers ginter(r)
normalized by melt density ρ and density of backbone monomers in a melt
ρbb, respectively. Correlation functions were plotted for
various degrees of polymerization of side chains
Nsc. As indicated in the legend, various colors
are used to distinguish between the lines with different values of
Nsc. Solid gray lines denote results for linear
melts, that is, with grafting density z = 0
(Nsc = 0), whereas other solid lines correspond
to z = 2. Dashed lines represent results for
z = 4 and Nsc = 10.The information about bottlebrush packing in the melt is contained in the
interbackbone correlation function
ginter(r) presented in Fig. 10B. In the case of linear chain melts,
ginter(r) reveals the structure at
very small length scales. ginter(r) is
zero for distances r below first peak because of Lennard-Jones (LJ)
core repulsion between monomers. The sharp peak at r ≈ 1.1
σ corresponds to the first “solvation shell,” which is the
optimal distance between pairs of nearest-neighbor monomers. The second peak at
r ≈ 1.9 σ displays the influence from the shell of
the second-nearest neighbors. In contrast to melts of linear chains, the large-scale
structure is observed in bottlebrush melts. Bottlebrush backbones are shielded by
densely grafted side chains and do not approach each other. This fact is clearly
demonstrated in the case of bottlebrushes with the long side chains, that is,
Nsc = 10 (solid red line for z = 2
and dashed red line for z = 4). At distances comparable to
bottlebrush thickness, equal to the average side-chain size for z = 2 and at
for z = 4, the corresponding values
of ginter(r) are low
ginter(r)/ρbb
≈ 0.1 because the “coat” of side chains around a given backbone
prevents neighboring backbones from approaching it. Note that the highest probability
to find monomers of neighboring backbones does not exactly match the brush diameter
but is rather at a shorter distance because of
partial interpenetration of side chains. The first maxima are observed at
rmax ≈ 7.25 σ for z = 2
and ≈ 8.35 σ for z = 4, respectively. The smaller
value of for z = 2 (≈0.87) with
respect to z = 4 (≈0.91) implies a stronger overlap of
grafted side chains in bottlebrush melts with lower z (see Fig. 9). The inset of Fig. 10B shows the correlation functions
ginter(r), with the abscissa rescaled
by the position of the first maximum rmax. The positions
of the peaks for bottlebrush systems correlate very well with the peaks observed for
linear chain, indicating a similar “liquid-like” origin of melt
structure (, ) but with stronger
correlations at correspondingly larger distances. This result justifies representing
bottlebrushes in melts by chains of “effective” monomers of size
, which are thick flexible filamentous objects.
The form factor of a bottlebrush backbone in a melt
The form factor S(q) of the backbones of
bottlebrushes with different grafting densities z of side chains is
presented as the Holtzer plot in Fig. 11. The
form factor of linear chains (z = 0) in a melt state (solid black
line) is well represented by the Debye function (black dashed line) and scales as
S(q) ∝
q−2 for large wave vectors q.
The backbone form factors of bottlebrushes exhibit different behavior because of the
backbone extension induced by side chains. For bottlebrushes with z
= 2 (solid red line), the backbone S(q) at
intermediate values of wave vector q < 0. 5
σ−1 is similar to the form factor of a semiflexible
chain. The simulation data for z = 2 (solid red line) were fitted to
the theoretical prediction of the structure factor of a semiflexible chain (blue
dashed line) (). Note that
the form factor of a semiflexible chain (blue dashed line) interpolates between the
Debye function (red dashed line) at large length scales (small q
values) and rigid rod form factor (dotted black line) at small length scales (high
q values). The overall very good agreement between simulation
data and theoretical prediction () is observed. The only difference is the presence of a
hump located between q ≈ 0.65 σ−1
and 1.96 σ−1. The nonmonotonicity of Holtzer plot
qS(q) for high q values is
attributed to the local flexibility of bottlebrushes at small length scales.
Flexibility of bottlebrushes at length scales below tension blob size ξ is
also confirmed by the existence of the fast initial decay of backbone bond
correlations (see Fig. 6A and Eq. 18). The case of bottlebrushes with
z = 4 (solid green line) cannot be fitted by the theoretical
structure factor of a semiflexible chain. Larger crowding of side-chain monomers
around the backbone gives rise to its increased extension for bottlebrushes with
z = 4. The persistence length in this case is much larger than
bottlebrush thickness, and structure factor is well approximated by the rigid
rod–like scattering (dotted green line).
Fig. 11
The form factor of a bottlebrush in a melt.
The Holtzer representation of the backbone form factor of bottlebrush melts
with different grafting densities of side chains per backbone monomer
z = 2 (red solid line) and z = 4 (green
solid line). The black solid line represents the form factor of a linear chain
(z = 0). The blue dashed line depicts the theoretical
prediction for the form factor of a semiflexible chain (). The dotted lines (black and green)
represent form factors of a rigid rod, whereas black and red dashed lines are
Debye form factors of a flexible chain. The inset shows simulation data in the
standard, S(q) versus q,
representation. The scaling laws of the ideal chain ∝
q−2 for z = 0 and the
rigid rod ∝ q−1 for
z = 4 are denoted.
The form factor of a bottlebrush in a melt.
The Holtzer representation of the backbone form factor of bottlebrush melts
with different grafting densities of side chains per backbone monomer
z = 2 (red solid line) and z = 4 (green
solid line). The black solid line represents the form factor of a linear chain
(z = 0). The blue dashed line depicts the theoretical
prediction for the form factor of a semiflexible chain (). The dotted lines (black and green)
represent form factors of a rigid rod, whereas black and red dashed lines are
Debye form factors of a flexible chain. The inset shows simulation data in the
standard, S(q) versus q,
representation. The scaling laws of the ideal chain ∝
q−2 for z = 0 and the
rigid rod ∝ q−1 for
z = 4 are denoted.
DISCUSSION
The conformations of bottlebrush macromolecules in melts depend on the side-chain
grafting density z and the degree of polymerization of side chains
Nsc. We demonstrated that the increase of
z and Nsc leads to the extension of the
bottlebrush backbone at intermediate length scales and enhancement of long-range
interactions between backbone monomers, causing stronger intra- and intermolecular
correlations similar to semidilute polyelectrolyte solutions. These interactions also
result in significant reduction of the overlap between side chains of neighboring
molecules. For moderate grafting densities with z ≤ 2, the
conformation of bottlebrush is similar to a filament composed of “effective
monomers” of size comparable with bottlebrush thickness (size of side chains).
The bottlebrush size follows ideal (Gaussian) chain statistics for z
≤ 2, and the mean square size of a bottlebrush is proportional to the product of
the backbone degree of polymerization Nbb and the
persistence length of the molecule , that is, . For high grafting densities z > 3,
bottlebrushes with short backbones Nbb ≲ 50 adopt
rodlike conformations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Simulations of bottlebrush melts were performed using three-dimensional coarse-grained
bead-spring model (). An
individual bottlebrush molecule is composed of Nbb backbone
monomers (beads) connected by bonds and z side chains of
Nsc monomers grafted to every backbone monomer (see Fig. 1A). Thus, the total number of beads in a
bottlebrush is N = Nbb +
zNbbNsc, where
z is the grafting density. The case of
Nsc = 0 (or z = 0) corresponds to a
linear chain.The nonbonded interactions between monomers separated by distance r
were modeled by the truncated and shifted LJ potentialwhere the interaction strength ϵ
is measured in units of thermal energy kBT,
σ is the monomer diameter, and rc is the cutoff. In
the NVT ensemble, we have used and rc =
21/6σ. This choice of LJ potential results in purely repulsive
interactions between monomers. The bonded interactions in a molecule were described by
the Kremer-Grest potential (),
VKG(r) =
VFENE(r) +
VLJ(r), with the “finitely
extensible nonlinear elastic” (FENE) potentialwhere the bond stiffness
and the maximum bond length
r0 = 1.5 σ (). All simulations were performed in a cubic box with
periodic boundary conditions imposed in all spatial dimensions. In the NVT ensemble, the
simulations were carried out at the overall monomer density ρ = 0.85
σ−3 corresponding to the intermolecular pressure
〈P〉 ≈ 4.75 ϵ/σ3. In a
separate set of simulations, we have also investigated melts of bottlebrushes with
attractive LJ potential with the interaction strength and the cutoff rc = 2.5
σ using NPT ensemble with P = 0, ensuring that the average
density 〈ρ〉 ≈ 0.85 σ−3 is the same
as in the NVT runs. The static properties obtained from both NVT and NPT simulations,
for example, the average bottlebrush size, demonstrate good agreement with each other
within the error bars after rescaling by the corresponding average bond length
l (bonds in NPT simulations are 1% shorter than those in NVT
simulations).The molecular dynamics simulations were performed by solving the Langevin equation of
motion for the position r =
[x,
y,
z] of each bead ()which describes the motion of a set of
interacting monomers. Forces and in Eq. 25
above are obtained from the LJ (Eq. 23)
and FENE (Eq. 24) interaction potentials
between the ith monomer and surrounding monomers. The third and fourth
terms on the right-hand side of Eq. 25
are a slowly evolving viscous force and a rapidly fluctuating stochastic force
, respectively. This random force
is related to the friction coefficient ζ by the
fluctuation-dissipation theorem . The friction coefficient used in simulations was
ζ = 0.5 mτ−1, where m
is the monomer mass and is the LJ time. The velocity Verlet scheme () was used for numerical
integration of equations of motion in Eq.
25. The integration step was taken to be Δτ = 0.01τ. A
Langevin thermostat was used to keep the temperature constant. All simulations were
carried out using Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator (LAMMPS)
(). Simulation snapshots
were rendered using Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD) (). Initially, molecules were grown using a
self-avoiding random walk technique and placed randomly in the simulation cell. The
initial density of all systems was small (≈ 0.03 σ−3).
Overlapping monomers in the initial configuration were pushed off using soft potential
with slowly ramped interaction strength. To obtain the desired melt density (ρ =
0.85 σ−3), the simulation box was gradually decreased in size
(see fig. S6) at constant velocity 10−3σ/τ.
Equivalently, a short (≈ 104τ) NPT simulation was performed at
pressure . We have verified that the results do not depend on the
sample preparation method. Once the target density was reached, simulations were
continued for up to at least three relaxation times of the corresponding system. During
the equilibration stage, the molecules diffused, on average, at least the root mean
square end-to-end distance of their backbones.Simulations of bottlebrush and linear chain melts were carried out for the following
number of backbone monomers Nbb = 10, 16, 20, 50, 100, and
150. The number of side-chain monomers Nsc was varied
between 0 and 32 for bottlebrushes with z = 1 and between 0 and 16 for
bottlebrushes with z = 2 side chains attached to each backbone monomer.
We assign unique symbols to denote data for each particular system. The convention of
symbols used throughout the article is displayed in Fig.
4B. The complete list of symbols can be found in table S2. In addition, for
molecules with Nbb = 50, the number of side chains per
backbone monomer was varied (z = 0, 1, 2 and 4). To avoid the finite
size effects, the number of molecules M in a simulation box was
changed; thus, the box size a was at least ≈ 2.5 times larger
than the root mean square end-to-end distance
〈R2〉1/2 of bottlebrush
backbones. Table S2 summarizes all parameters used in our computer simulations.
Authors: J P Wittmer; H Meyer; J Baschnagel; A Johner; S Obukhov; L Mattioni; M Müller; A N Semenov Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2004-09-29 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Daniel F Sunday; Alice B Chang; Christopher D Liman; Eliot Gann; Dean M Delongchamp; Lars Thomsen; Mark W Matsen; Robert H Grubbs; Christopher L Soles Journal: Macromolecules Date: 2018 Impact factor: 5.985
Authors: Johannes Ribisel; Simon Ullrich; Susanne Leidescher; Yana Feodorova; Erica Hildebrand; Alexandra Galitsyna; Sebastian Bultmann; Stephanie Link; Katharina Thanisch; Christopher Mulholland; Job Dekker; Heinrich Leonhardt; Leonid Mirny; Irina Solovei Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 28.213
Authors: Joel M Sarapas; Tyler B Martin; Alexandros Chremos; Jack F Douglas; Kathryn L Beers Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Johan H Gibcus; Kumiko Samejima; Anton Goloborodko; Itaru Samejima; Natalia Naumova; Johannes Nuebler; Masato T Kanemaki; Linfeng Xie; James R Paulson; William C Earnshaw; Leonid A Mirny; Job Dekker Journal: Science Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Carolyn R Shurer; Joe Chin-Hun Kuo; LaDeidra Monét Roberts; Jay G Gandhi; Marshall J Colville; Thais A Enoki; Hao Pan; Jin Su; Jade M Noble; Michael J Hollander; John P O'Donnell; Rose Yin; Kayvon Pedram; Leonhard Möckl; Lena F Kourkoutis; W E Moerner; Carolyn R Bertozzi; Gerald W Feigenson; Heidi L Reesink; Matthew J Paszek Journal: Cell Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 41.582