Literature DB >> 28861357

The evolution of refractive status in Chinese infants during the first year of life and its affected factors.

Shu-Juan Yu1, Guo-Hua Liu1, Yi Liu2, Jing Huang1, Ming-Lei Han1, Bo-Jun Zhao3, Zhong-Tao Gai2.   

Abstract

AIM: To study the evolution of the refractive status and examine the affected factors in infants during the first year of life in a large sample size in China.
METHODS: A total of 1258 babies (2516 eyes) aged 32wk gestational age to 1y participated in the study, including 766 premature and 492 full-term infants. First, each baby received an orthoptic examination, slit-lamp checking and fundus imaging. Patients with diseases which might affect refractive status were excluded from the cohort. The cycloplegia retinoscopy was performed. Their neonatal histories were reviewed. Each measurement contained the refractive status and calculation of the spherical equivalent (SE).
RESULTS: Refractive state showed an average hyperopia of +0.94±1.63 D at early ages, followed by a trend toward more hyperopia. The refractive state reached the top (+2.43±1.46 D) at the age of one to two months. Then gliding till one year old when the refractive state reached +0.59±1.41 D. The prevalence of astigmatism was 42.17% in the study, being 2.82% myopic astigmatism and 39.35% hyperopic astigmatism. The 94.1% of hyperopic astigmatism was with-the-rule astigmatism and 71.83% of myopic astigmatism was with-the-rule astigmatism. Refractive state between boys and girls was different. The mean SE of boys was +1.97±1.57 D, while that of girls was +1.79±1.46 D, and the difference was significant.
CONCLUSION: Before one year old, the change of refractive status is associated with checking age and sex. At the age of one to two months, the degree of hyperopia reaches the top. Boys have more hyperopic degree than girls, and with-the-rule astigmatism is predominant. Excluding premature infants with advanced retinopathy of prematurity, premature and full-term children have same refraction status.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corrected age; cycloplegic retinoscopy; infant, prematurity; refractive status; spherical equivalent

Year:  2017        PMID: 28861357      PMCID: PMC5554850          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.08.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  24 in total

1.  Ocular growth and refractive error development in premature infants without retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Anne Cook; Sarah White; Mark Batterbury; David Clark
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Can retinoscopy be used to screen infants for amblyopia? A longitudinal study of refraction in the first year of life.

Authors:  B Hopkisson; P Arnold; B Billingham; M McGarrigle; S Shribman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Refractive error in premature infants.

Authors:  Yokrat Ton; Yigal S Wysenbeek; Abraham Spierer
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Comparison of Refractive Error Changes in Retinopathy of Prematurity Patients Treated with Diode and Red Lasers.

Authors:  Ramak Roohipoor; Reza Karkhaneh; Mohammad Riazi Esfahani; Fateme Alipour; Mahtab Haghighat; Nazanin Ebrahimiadib; Mohammad Zarei; Ramin Mehrdad
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.250

5.  Refractive status and ocular axial length in preterm infants without retinopathy of prematurity with regard to birth weight and gestational age.

Authors:  Monika Modrzejewska; Wilhelm Grzesiak; Danuta Karczewicz; Daniel Zaborski
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.901

6.  Longitudinal change of refractive error in infants during the first year of life.

Authors:  I C Wood; S Hodi; L Morgan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 7.  Nature versus nurture: A systematic approach to elucidate gene-environment interactions in the development of myopic refractive errors.

Authors:  Virginia Miraldi Utz
Journal:  Ophthalmic Genet       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 1.803

8.  Cycloplegic and noncycloplegic refractions of Chinese neonatal infants.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Ailan Xie; Lijie Hou; Yanfeng Su; Fan Lu; Frank Thorn
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Refractive error and ethnicity in children.

Authors:  Robert N Kleinstein; Lisa A Jones; Sandral Hullett; Soonsi Kwon; Robert J Lee; Nina E Friedman; Ruth E Manny; Donald O Mutti; Julie A Yu; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08

10.  Prevalence of Refractive Errors in the INK Area, Durban, South Africa.

Authors:  Khathutshelo Percy Mashige; Jyotikumarie Jaggernath; Prasidh Ramson; Carrin Martin; Farai S Chinanayi; Kovin S Naidoo
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors That Influence Refractive Changes in the First Year of Myopia Development in Premature Infants.

Authors:  Jianbo Mao; Jimeng Lao; Chenyi Liu; Mingyuan Wu; Xueting Yu; Yirun Shao; Lin Zhu; Yiqi Chen; Lijun Shen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  Transscleral vs transpupillary diode laser photocoagulation for the treatment of zone II type 1 retinopathy of prematurity: Anatomical and refractive outcomes.

Authors:  Ramak Roohipourmoallai; Shahin Faghihi; Hooshang Faghihi; Ali Torkashvand; Amin Nabavi; Marjan I Fooladi; Afsar D Farahani; Fatemeh Bazvand; Siva S R Iyer; Nazanin Ebrahimiadib
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.848

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.