Literature DB >> 21087952

Cycloplegic and noncycloplegic refractions of Chinese neonatal infants.

Jie Chen1, Ailan Xie, Lijie Hou, Yanfeng Su, Fan Lu, Frank Thorn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine Chinese neonatal infants with both cycloplegic and noncycloplegic retinoscopy and to compare the distribution of refractive errors for the two techniques.
METHODS: Cycloplegic retinoscopy was performed by two experienced pediatric ophthalmologists on 81 neonatal infants randomly selected from a group of 185 neonates who had undergone noncycloplegic retinoscopy. All infants were between 1 day and 6 days of age and were born without incident at full term.
RESULTS: The mean cycloplegic spherical equivalent (CSE) was highly hyperopic (+3.55 diopters [D] ± 2.39 D). The mean noncycloplegic spherical equivalent (nCSE) was +0.58 D ± 2.32 D. The high reliability of the refractive measurements was demonstrated by high correlations between examiners (CSE: OD, r = 0.96; OS, r = 0.97; nCSE: OD, r = 0.94; OS, r = 0.93 OS) and between eyes (CSE: examiner 1, r = 0.94; examiner 2, r = 0.95; nCSE: examiner 1, r = 0.95; examiner 2, r = 0.97). The correlation between CSE and nCSE was much lower (examiner 1: OD, r = 0.76; OS, r = 0.73; examiner 2: OD, r = 0.72; OS, r = 0.70). Prevalence of astigmatism was very low (1.6% ≥ 1.0 D).
CONCLUSIONS: The level of hyperopia was very high in these infants, and the offsetting tonic accommodation demonstrated by the difference between CSE and nCSE was much higher than in any previous report. Low amounts of infantile hyperopia and high astigmatism are associated with future myopia in the West. The Chinese neonates in this study had high amounts of hyperopia and little astigmatism, yet they are at high risk to become myopic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21087952     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  16 in total

1.  Cycloplegic autorefraction in young adults: is it mandatory?

Authors:  Michael Mimouni; Lilach Zoller; Josefa Horowitz; Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe; Yair Morad; Eedy Mezer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Bidirectional, optical sign-dependent regulation of BMP2 gene expression in chick retinal pigment epithelium.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Yue Liu; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Long-wavelength (red) light produces hyperopia in juvenile and adolescent tree shrews.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne; Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Axial Elongation in Myopic Children and its Association With Myopia Progression in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial.

Authors:  Wei Hou; Thomas T Norton; Leslie Hyman; Jane Gwiazda
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.018

6.  Prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in non-Hispanic white and Asian children: multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study.

Authors:  Ge Wen; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Susan A Cotter; Mark Borchert; Jesse Lin; Jeniffer Kim; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Astigmatism in Chinese primary school children: prevalence, change, and effect on myopic shift.

Authors:  Shao-En Chan; Hsi-Kung Kuo; Chia-Ling Tsai; Pei-Chang Wu
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  The evolution of refractive status in Chinese infants during the first year of life and its affected factors.

Authors:  Shu-Juan Yu; Guo-Hua Liu; Yi Liu; Jing Huang; Ming-Lei Han; Bo-Jun Zhao; Zhong-Tao Gai
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 9.  Light levels, refractive development, and myopia--a speculative review.

Authors:  Thomas T Norton; John T Siegwart
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Refractive errors in 3-6 year-old Chinese children: a very low prevalence of myopia?

Authors:  Weizhong Lan; Feng Zhao; Lixia Lin; Zhen Li; Junwen Zeng; Zhikuan Yang; Ian G Morgan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.