| Literature DB >> 28860614 |
Lieselotte Obst1,2, Sebastian Göde3,4, Martin Rehwald1,2, Florian-Emanuel Brack1,2, João Branco1,2, Stefan Bock1, Michael Bussmann1, Thomas E Cowan1,2, Chandra B Curry4,5, Frederico Fiuza4, Maxence Gauthier4, René Gebhardt1, Uwe Helbig1, Axel Huebl1,2, Uwe Hübner6, Arie Irman1, Lev Kazak7, Jongjin B Kim4, Thomas Kluge1, Stephan Kraft1, Markus Loeser1,2, Josefine Metzkes1, Rohini Mishra4, Christian Rödel4,8, Hans-Peter Schlenvoigt1, Mathias Siebold1, Josef Tiggesbäumker7, Steffen Wolter7, Tim Ziegler1,2, Ulrich Schramm1,2, Siegfried H Glenzer4, Karl Zeil9.
Abstract
We report on recent experimental results deploying a continuous cryogenic hydrogen jet as a debris-free, renewable laser-driven source of pure proton beams generated at the 150 TW ultrashort pulse laser Draco. Efficient proton acceleration reaching cut-off energies of up to 20 MeV with particle numbers exceeding 109 particles per MeV per steradian is demonstrated, showing for the first time that the acceleration performance is comparable to solid foil targets with thicknesses in the micrometer range. Two different target geometries are presented and their proton beam deliverance characterized: cylindrical (∅ 5 μm) and planar (20 μm × 2 μm). In both cases typical Target Normal Sheath Acceleration emission patterns with exponential proton energy spectra are detected. Significantly higher proton numbers in laser-forward direction are observed when deploying the planar jet as compared to the cylindrical jet case. This is confirmed by two-dimensional Particle-in-Cell (2D3V PIC) simulations, which demonstrate that the planar jet proves favorable as its geometry leads to more optimized acceleration conditions.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28860614 PMCID: PMC5579044 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10589-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Schematic overview of experimental arrangement around the target chamber center (TCC) with the planar jet oriented normal to the incoming laser beam. (b) Images of the cold cylindrical and planar jet as observed along the main laser axis and an on-shot side view of the cylindrical jet at 3.5 ps after the main pulse. At this time the jet is no longer transparent, indicating that it is entirely ionized. (c) Third-order cross-correlator (Sequoia) measurements of the temporal laser contrast at 120 ps and few ps before the main pulse. Black dots indicate the contrast improvement that is achieved with the plasma mirror. The contrast improvement in the amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) plateau exceeds the dynamic range of the diagnostic (and is therefore not depicted here) but was estimated to be ~10−13.
Figure 2(a) Cut-off energies from laser axis Thomson parabola for cylindrical (laser focus aligned to 15 mm below the nozzle) and planar (laser focus aligned to 6 mm below the nozzle) jet. Note that only in 50% of the shots on the cylindrical jet protons above the detection threshold (E > 2 MeV) were produced, while the planar jet was hit in all shots. (b) Correlation of the lateral position of the cylindrical jet on-shot with the produced maximum proton energy (red). All evaluated shots (transparent markers) are binned (opaque markers with error bars matching the standard error of the mean). An additional data set shows the correlation of the on-shot transmitted light with the maximum proton energy. Linear fits were introduced to reveal the general trend.
Figure 3Proton emission distribution from RCF stacks. Horizontal and vertical emission from the two hydrogen jet geometries and a metal foil for comparison (shot at intrinsic laser contrast and under 45° laser incidence angle) are displayed. In a separate graph proton energy spectra are displayed, which are line-outs taken at the position of the dashed lines in the angular emission distributions.
Figure 4Simulation results, 260 fs after the main laser peak interacted with the target front surface: (a) Proton energy spectra of different simulated hydrogen target geometries (of target width w and thickness t, if applicable), averaged within an emission angle of ±4.5° from the 0° axis. (b) Phase space images along the laser axis for the cylindrical jet with diameter d = 5 μm and the planar jet with dimensions 20 μm × 2 μm, with an initial target center position at y = 15 μm, indicated by a dashed line. Features leading to the highest proton energies are identified as typical TNSA from the front and the rear surface of the target. Some protons from the target front are accelerated through the target in laser forward direction.
Figure 5Simulation results, 260 fs after the main laser peak interacted with the target front surface: (a) Proton charge density for four different hydrogen target shapes (5 μm circular, 10 μm × 2 μm, 20 μm × 2 μm, infinite with 2 μm thickness). The laser irradiates the target from the left side. Dashed white line indicates initial target position. (b) Rear side proton emission angle distribution corresponding to the target shapes in (a). The angular range covered by our RCF stacks is marked by gray dashed lines in the left-most geometry case.
Figure 6Target position stability study. (a) Cylindrical jet: focus depth jitter σ = 3 μm, lateral jitter σ = 10 μm. (b) Planar jet: focus depth jitter σ = 12 μm, lateral jitter σ = 10 μm, distance to nozzle: 10 mm. (c) Probability histogram describing the amount of laser intensity expected to be applied to the jet depending on its lateral positioning jitter. The intensity values are normalized to the maximum intensity, which is deposited in the cylindrical jet in the event of a central hit, while the value 0 corresponds to the case that the jet was entirely outside the laser focus. It was calculated from the overlap of a step-like jet profile and a Gaussian laser focus intensity distribution. The average spatial jitter of the laser focus was 1.5 μm and thus negligible compared to the lateral positioning jitter of the jet.