Francisco Leyva1, Abbasin Zegard2, Edmund Acquaye3, Christopher Gubran4, Robin Taylor5, Paul W X Foley5, Fraz Umar5, Kiran Patel4, Jonathan Panting4, Howard Marshall3, Tian Qiu3. 1. Aston Medical Research Institute, Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: http://www.doctorleyva.com. 2. Aston Medical Research Institute, Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 3. Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 4. Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 5. Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have cast doubt on the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with defibrillation (CRT-D) versus pacing (CRT-P) for patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Left ventricular myocardial scar portends poor clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether CRT-D is superior to CRT-P in patients with NICM either with (+) or without (-) left ventricular midwall fibrosis (MWF), detected by cardiac magnetic resonance. METHODS: Clinical events were quantified in patients with NICM who were +MWF (n = 68) or -MWF (n = 184) who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance prior to CRT device implantation. RESULTS: In the total study population, +MWF emerged as an independent predictor of total mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45 to 3.68), total mortality or heart failure hospitalization (aHR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.32 to 3.09), total mortality or hospitalization for major adverse cardiac events (aHR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.32 to 3.07), death from pump failure (aHR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.11 to 3.41), and sudden cardiac death (aHR: 3.75; 95% CI: 1.26 to 11.2) over a maximum follow-up period of 14 years (median 3.8 years [interquartile range: 2.0 to 6.1 years] for +MWF and 4.6 years [interquartile range: 2.4 to 8.3 years] for -MWF). In separate analyses of +MWF and -MWF, total mortality (aHR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.75), total mortality or heart failure hospitalization (aHR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.82), and total mortality or hospitalization for major adverse cardiac events (aHR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.78) were lower after CRT-D than after CRT-P in +MWF but not in -MWF. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NICM, CRT-D was superior to CRT-P in +MWF but not -MWF. These findings have implications for the choice of device therapy in patients with NICM.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have cast doubt on the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with defibrillation (CRT-D) versus pacing (CRT-P) for patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Left ventricular myocardial scar portends poor clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether CRT-D is superior to CRT-P in patients with NICM either with (+) or without (-) left ventricular midwall fibrosis (MWF), detected by cardiac magnetic resonance. METHODS: Clinical events were quantified in patients with NICM who were +MWF (n = 68) or -MWF (n = 184) who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance prior to CRT device implantation. RESULTS: In the total study population, +MWF emerged as an independent predictor of total mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45 to 3.68), total mortality or heart failure hospitalization (aHR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.32 to 3.09), total mortality or hospitalization for major adverse cardiac events (aHR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.32 to 3.07), death from pump failure (aHR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.11 to 3.41), and sudden cardiac death (aHR: 3.75; 95% CI: 1.26 to 11.2) over a maximum follow-up period of 14 years (median 3.8 years [interquartile range: 2.0 to 6.1 years] for +MWF and 4.6 years [interquartile range: 2.4 to 8.3 years] for -MWF). In separate analyses of +MWF and -MWF, total mortality (aHR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.75), total mortality or heart failure hospitalization (aHR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.82), and total mortality or hospitalization for major adverse cardiac events (aHR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.78) were lower after CRT-D than after CRT-P in +MWF but not in -MWF. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NICM, CRT-D was superior to CRT-P in +MWF but not -MWF. These findings have implications for the choice of device therapy in patients with NICM.
Authors: Timothy M Markman; David Bluemke; Elsayed Z Soliman; Colin Wu; Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Joao A C Lima; Saman Nazarian Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Janice Y Chyou; Wan Ting Tay; Inder S Anand; Tiew-Hwa Katherine Teng; Jonathan J L Yap; Michael R MacDonald; Vijay Chopra; Seet Yoong Loh; Wataru Shimizu; Imran Zainal Abidin; Arthur Mark Richards; Javed Butler; Carolyn S P Lam Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-03-13 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Francisco Leyva; Abbasin Zegard; Fraz Umar; Robin James Taylor; Edmund Acquaye; Christopher Gubran; Shajil Chalil; Kiran Patel; Jonathan Panting; Howard Marshall; Tian Qiu Journal: Europace Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 5.214