Literature DB >> 28859394

Esophageal achalasia: a risk factor for carcinoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

F Tustumi, W M Bernardo, J R M da Rocha, S Szachnowicz, F C Seguro, E T Bianchi, R A A Sallum, I Cecconello.   

Abstract

Achalasia of the cardia is associated with an increased risk of esophageal carcinoma. The real burden of achalasia at the malignancy genesis is still a controversial issue. Therefore, there are no generally accepted recommendations on follow-up evaluation for achalasia patients. This study aims to estimate the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in achalasia patients. We searched for association between carcinoma and esophageal achalasia in databases up to January 2017 to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of 1,046 studies were identified from search strategy, of which 40 were selected for meta-analysis. A cumulative number of 11,978 esophageal achalasia patients were evaluated. The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma was 312.4 (StDev 429.16) cases per 100,000 patient-years at risk. The incidence of adenocarcinoma was 21.23 (StDev 31.6) cases per 100,000 patient-years at risk. The prevalence for esophageal carcinoma was 28 carcinoma cases in 1,000 esophageal achalasia patients (CI 95% 2, 39). The prevalence for squamous cell carcinoma was 26 cases in 1,000 achalasia patients (CI 95% 18, 39) and for adenocarcinoma was 4 cases in 1,000 achalasia patients (CI 95% 3, 6).The absolute risk increase for squamous cell carcinoma was 308.1 and for adenocarcinoma was 18.03 cases per 100,000 patients per year. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis estimating the burden of achalasia as an esophageal cancer risk factor. The high increased risk rate for cancer in achalasia patients points to a strict endoscopic surveillance for these patients. Also, the increased risk for developing adenocarcinoma in achalasia patients suggests fundoplication after myotomy, to avoid esophageal reflux and Barret esophagus, a known risk factor for adenocarcinoma.
© The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenocarcinoma; esophageal achalasia; esophageal neoplasm; meta-analysis; squamous cell carcinoma; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28859394     DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  17 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic and Surgical Treatments for Achalasia: Who to Treat and How?

Authors:  Romulo A Fajardo; Roman V Petrov; Charles T Bakhos; Abbas E Abbas
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 2.  Updated Systematic Review of Achalasia, with a Focus on POEM Therapy.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell; Stavros Nicholas Stavropoulos; David Friedel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Poem Versus Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy in the Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia: A Case-Control Study from Two High Volume Centers Using the Propensity Score.

Authors:  Andrea Costantini; Pietro Familiari; Mario Costantini; Renato Salvador; Michele Valmasoni; Giovanni Capovilla; Rosario Landi; Francesca Mangiola; Luca Provenzano; Dario Briscolini; Stefano Merigliano; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Microbial Dysbiosis in Achalasia: Insights on How to Prevent Cancer.

Authors:  Vitor P Arienzo; Isabela R Sunye; Francisco Tustumi
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.725

Review 5.  Esophagectomy for End-Stage Achalasia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Aiolfi; Emanuele Asti; Gianluca Bonitta; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Achalasia and esophageal cancer: risks and links.

Authors:  Maura Torres-Aguilera; José María Remes Troche
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09-06

7.  PIK3CA mutations are frequent in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma associated with chagasic megaesophagus and are associated with a worse patient outcome.

Authors:  Fernanda Franco Munari; Adriana Cruvinel-Carloni; Croider Franco Lacerda; Antônio Talvane Torres de Oliveira; Cristovam Scapulatempo-Neto; Sandra Regina Morini da Silva; Eduardo Crema; Sheila Jorge Adad; Maria Aparecida Marchesan Rodrigues; Maria Aparecida Coelho Arruda Henry; Denise Peixoto Guimarães; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; Rui Manuel Reis
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2018-12-29       Impact factor: 2.965

8.  Chagasic Megaesophagus-Associated Carcinoma: Clinical Pattern and Outcomes.

Authors:  Mariane C L Martins; Daniela L Miyazaki; Camila C T Gabiatti; Leandro P Silva; Lígia T Macedo; Nádia S Siqueira; Nelson A Andreollo; José B C Carvalheira
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-08

Review 9.  The Mechanisms for the Association of Cancer and Esophageal Dysmotility Disorders.

Authors:  Francisco Tustumi; Jorge Henrique Bento de Sousa; Nicolas Medeiros Dornelas; Guilherme Maganha Rosa; Milton Steinman; Edno Tales Bianchi
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21

10.  Effect of silencing C-erbB-2 on esophageal carcinoma cell biological behaviors by inhibiting IGF-1 pathway activation.

Authors:  Zhigao Niu; Wenping Zhang; Jialun Shi; Xiangdong Li; Hanlei Wu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.