| Literature DB >> 28859373 |
Elizabete Carmo-Silva1,2, P John Andralojc1, Joanna C Scales1, Steven M Driever3,4, Andrew Mead5, Tracy Lawson3, Christine A Raines3, Martin A J Parry1,2.
Abstract
Improving photosynthesis is a major target for increasing crop yields and ensuring food security. Phenotyping of photosynthesis in the field is critical to understand the limits to crop performance in agricultural settings. Yet, detailed phenotyping of photosynthetic traits is relatively scarce in field-grown wheat, with previous studies focusing on narrow germplasm selections. Flag leaf photosynthetic traits, crop development, and yield traits were compared in 64 field-grown wheat cultivars in the UK. Pre-anthesis and post-anthesis photosynthetic traits correlated significantly and positively with grain yield and harvest index (HI). These traits included net CO2 assimilation measured at ambient CO2 concentrations and a range of photosynthetic photon flux densities, and traits associated with the light response of photosynthesis. In most cultivars, photosynthesis decreased post-anthesis compared with pre-anthesis, and this was associated with decreased Rubisco activity and abundance. Heritability of photosynthetic traits suggests that phenotypic variation can be used to inform breeding programmes. Specific cultivars were identified with traits relevant to breeding for increased crop yields in the UK: pre-anthesis photosynthesis, post-anthesis photosynthesis, light response of photosynthesis, and Rubisco amounts. The results indicate that flag leaf longevity and operating photosynthetic activity in the canopy can be further exploited to maximize grain filling in UK bread wheat.Entities:
Keywords: CO2 assimilation; Rubisco; crop yield; light response; post-anthesis; pre-anthesis; productivity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28859373 PMCID: PMC5853948 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.Daily maximum and minimum air temperature and daily precipitation at Rothamsted, Harpenden, UK, from early April to late July in 2012 and 2013. The times when measurements were taken at pre-anthesis (5–14 June 2013; flag leaf fully emerged) and post-anthesis (1–11 July 2013; 7 d after half of the anthers per ear emerged) are indicated for the season of 2013. The corresponding time of the year when measurements were taken in the 2012 trial (Driever ) is indicated for comparison (22–30 May 2012; pre-anthesis, flag leaf fully emerged). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Physiological and agronomical traits determined for 64 field-grown wheat cultivars (ERYCC panel) in 2013 in the UK
| Trait | Description |
|---|---|
| TGWPlanting | Thousand-grain weight (g), dry weight of 1000 grains, determined for seed used for planting |
| Biomass | Total above-ground biomass (t ha−1), straw and grain dry weight, determined by harvest of whole plot |
| Straw | Straw biomass (t ha−1), straw dry weight, determined by harvest of whole plot |
| GY | Grain yield (t ha−1), grain weight at 85% dry matter, determined by harvest of whole plot |
| HI | Harvest index (kg grain kg−1 biomass), grain dry weight as a fraction of total above-ground biomass |
| Z4, Z6.5 | Time (days after planting, DAP) at which Zadoks stages 4 or 6.5 were reached |
| S5, S10 | Time (days after planting, DAP) at which senescence scores S5 and S10 were reached |
| LAI | Leaf area index (relative units), measured at four locations per plot |
| Height | Mean plant height (cm), measured for four representative plants per plot |
| SPADPlot | Mean SPAD (leaf chlorophyll) of flag leaves, measured for four plants per plot |
| SPADLeaf | Mean SPAD (leaf chlorophyll) of leaf used in gas exchange analysis, measured at three points per leaf |
|
| Mean quantum yield ( |
|
| Maximum quantum efficiency of PSII in the light (relative units) |
| LMA | Leaf mass per area (g m−2), determined with three leaf disks from the leaf used in gas exchange |
|
| Net CO2 assimilation rate (μmol m−2 s−1) at PPFD 250 μmol photons m−2 s−1 and 400 μmol mol−1 CO2 |
|
| Net CO2 assimilation rate (μmol m−2 s−1) at PPFD 500 μmol photons m−2 s−1 and 400 μmol mol−1 CO2 |
|
| Net CO2 assimilation rate (μmol m−2 s−1) at PPFD 1000 μmol photons m−2 s−1 and 400 μmol mol−1 CO2 |
|
| Net CO2 assimilation rate (μmol m−2 s−1) at PPFD 1800 μmol photons m−2 s−1 and 400 μmol mol−1 CO2 |
|
| Maximum net CO2 assimilation rate (μmol m−2 s−1) at PPFD 1800 μmol m−2 s−1 and 1200 μmol mol−1 CO2 |
|
| Stomatal conductance to water vapour (mol m−2 s−1) at PPFD 1800 μmol m−2 s−1 and 400 μmol mol−1 CO2 |
|
| Leaf temperature (°C), measured by thermocouple |
|
| Maximum carboxylation activity of Rubisco (μmol CO2 m−2 s−1), estimated by |
|
| Maximum electron transport rate (μmol electrons m−2 s−1), estimated by |
|
| Ratio between |
|
|
|
|
| Difference between |
|
| Dark respiration (μmol m−2 s−1), estimated by light curve fitting |
| φ ( | Apparent quantum yield (mol CO2 mol−1 photons), estimated by light curve fitting |
| θ (A/ | Curvature of the light response of net CO2 assimilation (relative units), estimated by light curve fitting |
| LCP( | Light compensation point (μmol photons m−2 s−1), estimated by light curve fitting |
|
| Net CO2 assimilation rate (μmol m−2 s−1) at saturating PPFD and 400 μmol mol−1 CO2, estimated by light curve fitting |
| RI/T | Rubisco activation (initial/total activity, relative units) |
| RAmt | Rubisco amount per unit leaf area (g m−2) |
| TSP | Total soluble protein per unit leaf area (g m−2) |
| R/TSP | Rubisco amount relative to total soluble protein (mg mg−1) |
| RInitial | Rubisco initial activity (μmol CO2 fixed m−2 s−1), on a leaf area basis |
| RTotal | Rubisco total activity (μmol CO2 fixed m−2 s−1), on a leaf area basis |
Fig. 2.The relationship between plant above-ground biomass and grain yield. The total above-ground biomass correlated positively with grain yield (A), but the straw dry matter did not (B). Values are adjusted means for three separate plots per cultivar.
Fig. 3.Correlation matrix showing the significance of linear correlations between paired mean values of genetic, physiological, and agronomical traits from 64 field-grown wheat cultivars. Numbers are Pearson product–moment correlation coefficients (r, df=62) and increasingly significant correlations (P≤0.05, P≤0.01, and P≤0.001) are indicated by increasingly darker shading. Year of cultivar release, spring growth habit (spring versus winter based on flowering response to temperature), presence of genes Ppd1, Ppd2, and Lr37; yield data over multiple sites and years (YieldBreeders) were kindly supplied by the authors of a previous study (Clarke ). Measured traits are described in Table 1. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 4.Correlation matrix showing the significance of linear correlations between paired mean values of photosynthetic and yield traits from 64 field-grown wheat cultivars. Numbers are Pearson product–moment correlation coefficients (r, df=62) and increasingly significant correlations (P≤0.05, P≤0.01, and P≤0.001) are indicated by increasingly darker shading. Year of cultivar release and yield data over multiple sites and years (YieldBreeders) were kindly supplied by the authors of a previous study (Clarke ). Measured traits are described in Table 1. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 5.The relationship between flag leaf longevity (A, B) or photosynthetic activity (C, D) and harvest index (A, C) or grain yield (B, D) in 64 field-grown wheat cultivars. Flag leaf longevity was the time between flag leaf emergence and 50% senescence (Z4–S5) and correlated positively with harvest index (A) and grain yield (B). Net CO2 assimilation rates of pre- and post-anthesis flag leaves at 400 μmol mol−1 CO2 and 1000 μmol photons m−2 s−1 (AQ1000) correlated positively with harvest index (C) and grain yield (D). The highest yielding cultivars Mercato, Zebedee, and Gladiator are identified. Data points are adjusted means for three separate plots per cultivar. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 6.The relationship between photosynthetic traits in flag leaves of 64 field-grown wheat cultivars. The maximum electron transport rate (Jmax) and the maximum carboxylation activity of Rubisco (Vcmax) were highly correlated and both decreased post-anthesis compared with pre-anthesis (A). Net CO2 assimilation rates of pre- and post-anthesis flag leaves at 400 μmol mol−1 CO2 and 1000 μmol photons m−2 s−1 (AQ1000) correlated positively with the ratio Jmax/Vcmax (B) and with the Rubisco initial activity per unit leaf area (C). Rubisco amount and activation state correlated negatively (D). Symbols: filled, pre-anthesis (solid lines); open, post-anthesis (dashed lines). Cultivars that stood out (Gatsby and Brompton) are identified. Data points are adjusted means for three separate plots per cultivar. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Broad-sense heritability (H2) of yield, agronomic, and photosynthetic traits in UK wheat measured pre- and post-anthesis
Values obtained for a limited number of traits measured for the 2012 trial (Driever et al., 2014) are provided for comparative purposes
| 2013 | 2012 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield traits |
| Yield traits |
| |
| Biomass | 0.279 | Biomass | 0.819 | |
| Straw | 0.471 | Straw | 0.725 | |
| GY | 0.576 | GY | 0.892 | |
| HI | 0.765 | HI | 0.710 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Z4–S5 | 0.667 | Z4–S5 | – | |
| Z4; Z6.5 | 0.933 | 0.966 | Z4; Z6.5 | – |
| LAI | 0.838 | 0.860 | LAI | 0.758 |
| Height | 0.892 | 0.883 | Height | – |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.464 | 0.441 |
| – |
|
| 0.656 | 0.314 |
| – |
|
| 0.721 | 0.319 |
| – |
|
| 0.709 | 0.342 |
| 0.713 |
|
| 0.593 | 0.544 |
| 0.498 |
|
| 0.764 | 0.513 |
| – |
|
| 0.643 | 0.639 |
| – |
| θ (A/Q) | 0.429 | 0.646 | θ (A/Q) | – |
| LCP(A/Q) | 0.267 | 0.757 | LCP(A/Q) | – |
|
| 0.730 | 0.520 |
| – |
| R/TSP | 0.448 | 0.644 | R/TSP | – |
| RAmt | 0.535 | -- | RAmt | 0.524 |
Traits and cultivars of interest for breeding increased wheat yields in the UK
| Trait | Potential |
|---|---|
| Pre-anthesis | Increase photosynthetic efficiency when flag leaves are most active |
| Post-anthesis | Increase photosynthetic efficiency at a critical stage for grain filling |
| Light response of | Improve photosynthetic radiation use efficiency |
| Rubisco amount | Optimize allocation of resources and N use efficiency (NUE) |
|
|
|
| Mercato, Zebedee | High-yielding cultivar that combines high pre-anthesis |
| Gladiator | High-yielding cultivar that combines high post- anthesis |
| Gatsby | High photosynthetic rates with low Rubisco amounts (improve NUE?) |