Literature DB >> 28858562

Evaluation of Kidney Stones with Reduced-Radiation Dose CT: Progress from 2011-2012 to 2015-2016-Not There Yet.

Karrin Weisenthal1, Priyadarshini Karthik1, Melissa Shaw1, Debapriya Sengupta1, Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield1, Judy Burleson1, Adel Mustafa1, Mannudeep Kalra1, Christopher Moore1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine if the use of reduced-dose computed tomography (CT) for evaluation of kidney stones increased in 2015-2016 compared with that in 2011-2012, to determine variability in radiation exposure according to facility for this indication, and to establish a current average radiation dose for CT evaluation for kidney stones by querying a national dose registry. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study was exempt from institutional review board approval. Data were obtained from the American College of Radiology dose registry for CT examinations submitted from July 2015 to June 2016. Study descriptors consistent with single-phase unenhanced CT for evaluation of kidney stones and associated RadLex® Playbook identifiers (RPIDs) were retrospectively identified. Facilities actively submitting data on kidney stone-specific CT examinations were included. Dose metrics including volumetric CT dose index, dose-length product, and size-specific dose estimate, when available, were reported, and a random effects model was run to account for clustering of CT examinations at facilities. A z-ratio was calculated to test for a significant difference between the proportion of reduced-radiation dose CT examinations (defined as those with a dose-length product of 200 mGy · cm or less) performed in 2015-2016 and the proportion performed in 2011-2012. Results Three hundred four study descriptors for kidney stone CT corresponding to data from 328 facilities that submitted 105 334 kidney stone CT examinations were identified. Reduced-dose CT examinations accounted for 8040 of 105 334 (7.6%) CT examinations, a 5.6% increase from the 1010 of 49 903 (2%) examinations in 2011-2012 (P < .001). Mean overall dose-length product was 689 mGy · cm (95% confidence interval: 667, 712), decreased from the mean of 746 mGy · cm observed in 2011-2012. Median facility dose-length product varied up to sevenfold, from less than 200 mGy · cm to greater than 1600 mGy · cm. Conclusion Use of reduced-radiation dose CT for evaluation of kidney stones has increased since 2011-2012, but remains low; variability of radiation dose according to facility continues to be wide. National mean CT radiation exposure for evaluation of renal colic during 2015-2016 decreased relative to 2011-2012 values, but remained well above what is reasonably achievable. © RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28858562      PMCID: PMC5791338          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tilo Niemann; Thilo Kollmann; Georg Bongartz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Trends in imaging use during the emergency department evaluation of flank pain.

Authors:  Elias S Hyams; Frederick K Korley; Julius C Pham; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Identifying Institutional Diagnostic Reference Levels for CT with Radiation Dose Index Monitoring Software.

Authors:  Kate MacGregor; Iris Li; Timothy Dowdell; Bruce G Gray
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  CT dose reduction applications: available tools on the latest generation of CT scanners.

Authors:  Siva P Raman; Pamela T Johnson; Swati Deshmukh; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Katharine L Grant; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Dose is not always what it seems: where very misleading values can result from volume CT dose index and dose length product.

Authors:  J Anthony Seibert; John M Boone; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges; Ramit Lamba
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  256-MDCT for evaluation of urolithiasis: iterative reconstruction allows for a significant reduction of the applied radiation dose while maintaining high subjective and objective image quality.

Authors:  Simon Veldhoen; Azien Laqmani; Thorsten Derlin; Murat Karul; Diego Hammerle; Jan-Hendrik Buhk; Susanne Sehner; Hans D Nagel; Felix Chun; Gerhard Adam; Marc Regier
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 1.735

7.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Alexandria C Smith; Janet M Hanley; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota.

Authors:  C M Johnson; D M Wilson; W M O'Fallon; R S Malek; L T Kurland
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers.

Authors:  Michael N Ferrandino; Aditya Bagrodia; Sean A Pierre; Charles D Scales; Edward Rampersaud; Margaret S Pearle; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Emergency department visits, use of imaging, and drugs for urolithiasis have increased in the United States.

Authors:  Chyng-Wen Fwu; Paul W Eggers; Paul L Kimmel; John W Kusek; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  11 in total

1.  Five-star rating system for acceptable quality and dose in CT.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Low-dose dual-energy CT for stone characterization: a systematic comparison of two generations of split-filter single-source and dual-source dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Dominik Nakhostin; Thomas Sartoretti; Matthias Eberhard; Bernhard Krauss; Daniel Müller; Hatem Alkadhi; André Euler
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-07

3.  Increased urinary bladder volume improves the detectability of urinary stones at the ureterovesical junction in non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT).

Authors:  Maxim Avanesov; Julja Togmat; Mehtap Solmaz; Michael Gerhard Kaul; Azien Laqmani; Helena Guerreiro; Sarah Keller; Lars Weisbach; Gerhard Adam; Jin Yamamura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Computed Tomography Radiation Exposure Among Referred Kidney Stone Patients: Results from the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter.

Authors:  David T Tzou; Samuel Zetumer; Manint Usawachintachit; Kazumi Taguchi; Seth K Bechis; Brian D Duty; Jonathan D Harper; Ryan S Hsi; Mathew Sorensen; Roger L Sur; Shalonda Reliford-Titus; Helena C Chang; Dylan Isaacson; David B Bayne; Zhen J Wang; Marshall L Stoller; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Emergency department non-contrast computed tomography for suspicion of obstructive urolithiasis: Yield and consequences.

Authors:  Ziv Savin; Snir Dekalo; Eran Schreter; Reuben Ben-David; Ismail Masarwa; Adva Cahen-Peretz; Sharon A Greenberg; Galit Aviram; Ofer Yossepowitch; Mario Sofer
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.052

Review 6.  [Update of the 2Sk guidelines on the diagnostics, treatment and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF register number 043-025) : What is new?]

Authors:  C Seitz; T Bach; M Bader; W Berg; T Knoll; A Neisius; C Netsch; M Nothacker; S Schmidt; M Schönthaler; R Siener; R Stein; M Straub; W Strohmaier; C Türk; B Volkmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Image quality and pathology assessment in CT Urography: when is the low-dose series sufficient?

Authors:  Bharti Kataria; Jonas Nilsson Althén; Örjan Smedby; Anders Persson; Hannibal Sökjer; Michael Sandborg
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  Using 2-mSv Appendiceal CT in Usual Practice for Adolescents and Young Adults: Willingness Survey of 579 Radiologists, Emergency Physicians, and Surgeons from 20 Hospitals.

Authors:  Hyuk Jung Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee; Min Jeong Kim; Sung Bin Park; Yousun Ko
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Clinical Low Dose Photon Counting CT for the Detection of Urolithiasis: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose.

Authors:  Julius Henning Niehoff; Alexandra Fiona Carmichael; Matthias Michael Woeltjen; Jan Boriesosdick; Ingo Lopez Schmidt; Arwed Elias Michael; Nils Große Hokamp; Hansjuergen Piechota; Jan Borggrefe; Jan Robert Kroeger
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 10.  What are the clinical effects of the different emergency department imaging options for suspected renal colic? A scoping review.

Authors:  Erik Doty; Stephen DiGiacomo; Bridget Gunn; Lauren Westafer; Elizabeth Schoenfeld
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.