Literature DB >> 28858149

Conducting Clinically Based Intimate Partner Violence Research: Safety Protocol Recommendations.

Jocelyn C Anderson1, Nancy E Glass, Jacquelyn C Campbell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maintaining safety is of utmost importance during research involving participants who have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV). Limited guidance on safety protocols to protect participants is available, particularly information related to technology-based approaches to informed consent, data collection, and contacting participants during the course of a study.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the article is to provide details on the safety protocol developed and utilized with women receiving care at an urban HIV clinic and who were taking part in an observational study of IPV, mental health symptoms, and substance abuse and their relationship to HIV treatment adherence. The protocol presents the technological strategies to promote safety and allow autonomy in participant decision-making throughout the research process, including Voice over Internet Protocol telephone numbers, and tablet-based eligibility screening and data collection. Protocols for management of participants at risk for suicide and/or intimate partner homicide that included automated high-risk messaging to participants and research staff and facilitated disclosure of risk to clinical staff based on participant preferences are discussed. DISCUSSION: Use of technology and partnership with clinic staff helped to provide an environment where research regarding IPV could be conducted without undue burden or risk to participants. Utilizing tablet-based survey administration provided multiple practical and safety benefits for participants. Most women who screened into high-risk categories for suicide or intimate partner homicide did not choose to have their results shared with their healthcare providers, indicating the importance of allowing participants control over information sharing whenever possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28858149      PMCID: PMC5656401          DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  17 in total

1.  Tarasoff and the researcher: does the duty to protect apply in the research setting?

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Alan Rosenbaum
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1989-06

2.  Ethical and safety considerations when obtaining information from or about battered women for research purposes.

Authors:  Cris M Sullivan; Debra Cain
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2004-05

3.  A comparison study: paper-based versus web-based data collection and management.

Authors:  Bryan A Weber; Hossein Yarandi; Meredeth A Rowe; Justus P Weber
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.257

4.  A protocol of safety: research on abuse of women. Nursing Research Consortium on Violence and Abuse.

Authors:  B Parker; Y Ulrich
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Ethics in violence against women research: the sensitive, the dangerous, and the overlooked.

Authors:  Lisa Aronson Fontes
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2004

6.  Are researchers bound by child abuse reporting laws?

Authors:  A M Steinberg; R S Pynoos; A K Goenjian; H Sossanabadi; L Sherr
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  1999-08

7.  The danger assessment: validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide.

Authors:  Jacquelyn C Campbell; Daniel W Webster; Nancy Glass
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2008-07-30

8.  Ethical conduct in intimate partner violence research: challenges and strategies.

Authors:  Rula Btoush; Jacquelyn C Campbell
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.250

9.  Feasibility of an online safety planning intervention for rural and urban pregnant abused women.

Authors:  Tina L Bloom; Nancy E Glass; James Case; Courtney Wright; Kimberly Nolte; Lindsay Parsons
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Tablet, web-based, or paper questionnaires for measuring anxiety in patients suspected of breast cancer: patients' preferences and quality of collected data.

Authors:  Maarten W Barentsz; Hester Wessels; Paul J van Diest; Ruud M Pijnappel; Cees Haaring; Carmen C van der Pol; Arjen J Witkamp; Maurice A van den Bosch; Helena M Verkooijen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  4 in total

1.  Understanding Intimate Partner Violence among Immigrant and Refugee Women: A Grounded Theory Analysis.

Authors:  Veronica P S Njie-Carr; Bushra Sabri; Jill T Messing; Cecelia Suarez; Allison Ward-Lasher; Karin Wachter; Christina X Marea; Jacquelyn Campbell
Journal:  J Aggress Maltreat Trauma       Date:  2020-09-29

2.  Perceived Risks and Benefits in IPV and HIV Research: Listening to the Voices of HIV-Positive African American Women.

Authors:  Nicole M Overstreet; Mukadder Okuyan; Celia B Fisher
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Core components and strategies for suicide and risk management protocols in mental health research: a scoping review.

Authors:  Katye Stevens; Vivetha Thambinathan; Elisa Hollenberg; Fiona Inglis; Andrew Johnson; Andrea Levinson; Soha Salman; Leah Cardinale; Brian Lo; Jenny Shi; David Wiljer; Daphne J Korczak; Kristin Cleverley
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 4.  Nursing research on intimate partner violence in China: A scoping review.

Authors:  Quanlei Li; Huaping Liu; Kuei-Ru Chou; Chia-Chin Lin; Iat-Kio Van; Patricia M Davidson; Jacquelyn C Campbell
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2020-09-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.