Literature DB >> 28858076

Putative genomic characteristics of BRAF V600K versus V600E cutaneous melanoma.

Yuanyuan Li1, David M Umbach, Leping Li.   

Abstract

Approximately 50% of all cutaneous melanomas harbor activating BRAF V600 mutations; among, these 10-30% carry the V600K mutation. Clinically, patients with V600K tumors experience distant metastases sooner and have an increased risk of relapse and shorter survival than patients with V600E tumors. Despite the clinical and other histopathological differences between these BRAF tumor subtypes, little is known about them at the genomic level. Herein, we systematically compared BRAF V600E and V600K skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for differential protein, gene, and microRNA expression genome-wide using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Our analyses showed that elements of energy-metabolism and protein-translation pathways were upregulated and that proapoptotic pathways were downregulated in V600K tumors compared with V600E tumors. We found that c-Kit protein and KIT gene expressions were significantly higher in V600K tumors than in V600E tumors, concurrent with significant downregulation of several KIT-targeting microRNAs (mir) including mir-222 in V600K tumors, suggesting KIT and mir-222 might be key genomic contributors toward the clinical differences observed. The relationship that we uncovered among KIT/c-Kit expression, mir-222 expression, and growth and prosurvival signals in V600 tumors is intriguing. We believe that the observed clinical aggressiveness of V600K tumors compared to V600E tumors may be attributable to the increased energy metabolism, protein translation and prosurvival signals compared with V600E tumors. If confirmed using larger numbers of V600K tumors, our results may prove useful for designing clinical management and targeted chemotherapeutical interventions for BRAF V600K-positive melanomas. Finally, the small sample size in V600K tumors is a major limitation of our study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28858076      PMCID: PMC5669042          DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  49 in total

Review 1.  Upstream and downstream of mTOR.

Authors:  Nissim Hay; Nahum Sonenberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  MicroRNAs modulate the angiogenic properties of HUVECs.

Authors:  Laura Poliseno; Andrea Tuccoli; Laura Mariani; Monica Evangelista; Lorenzo Citti; Keith Woods; Alberto Mercatanti; Scott Hammond; Giuseppe Rainaldi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Distinguishing clinicopathologic features of patients with V600E and V600K BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Alexander M Menzies; Lauren E Haydu; Lydia Visintin; Matteo S Carlino; Julie R Howle; John F Thompson; Richard F Kefford; Richard A Scolyer; Georgina V Long
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  The role of microRNA genes in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Huiling He; Krystian Jazdzewski; Wei Li; Sandya Liyanarachchi; Rebecca Nagy; Stefano Volinia; George A Calin; Chang-Gong Liu; Kaarle Franssila; Saul Suster; Richard T Kloos; Carlo M Croce; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  BRAF/NRAS wild-type melanomas have a high mutation load correlating with histologic and molecular signatures of UV damage.

Authors:  Victoria J Mar; Stephen Q Wong; Jason Li; Richard A Scolyer; Catriona McLean; Anthony T Papenfuss; Richard W Tothill; Hojabr Kakavand; Graham J Mann; John F Thompson; Andreas Behren; Jonathan S Cebon; Rory Wolfe; John W Kelly; Alexander Dobrovic; Grant A McArthur
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  miR221/222 in cancer: their role in tumor progression and response to therapy.

Authors:  M Garofalo; C Quintavalle; G Romano; C M Croce; G Condorelli
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.222

Review 7.  The c-kit receptor, stem cell factor, and mast cells. What each is teaching us about the others.

Authors:  S J Galli; M Tsai; B K Wershil
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 8.  Stem cell factor receptor/c-Kit: from basic science to clinical implications.

Authors:  Johan Lennartsson; Lars Rönnstrand
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  MicroRNA-dependent regulation of cKit in cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  O Igoucheva; V Alexeev
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2009-01-04       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  MiR-17-92 and miR-221/222 cluster members target KIT and ETV1 in human gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

Authors:  C M M Gits; P F van Kuijk; M B E Jonkers; A W M Boersma; W F van Ijcken; A Wozniak; R Sciot; P Rutkowski; P Schöffski; T Taguchi; R H J Mathijssen; J Verweij; S Sleijfer; M Debiec-Rychter; E A C Wiemer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Interacting Genetic Lesions of Melanoma in the Tumor Microenvironment: Defining a Viable Therapy.

Authors:  R R Maniyar; S Chakraborty; T Jarboe; R Suriano; M Wallack; J Geliebter; R K Tiwari
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  The Genetics of Early-Stage Melanoma in a Veteran Population.

Authors:  Kevin Cheung; Aaron D Bossler; Sarah L Mott; Megan Zeisler; Julie McKillip; Yousef Zakharia; Brian L Swick; Jennifer G Powers
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 3.  Optimal treatment strategy for metastatic melanoma patients harboring BRAF-V600 mutations.

Authors:  Emilio Francesco Giunta; Vincenzo De Falco; Stefania Napolitano; Giuseppe Argenziano; Gabriella Brancaccio; Elvira Moscarella; Davide Ciardiello; Fortunato Ciardiello; Teresa Troiani
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 8.168

4.  Increased Expression of T-Box Transcription Factor Protein 21 (TBX21) in Skin Cutaneous Melanoma Predicts Better Prognosis: A Study Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Databases.

Authors:  Xingying Zhang; Xin Wen; Ning Feng; Aoxing Chen; Senbang Yao; Xin Ding; Longzhen Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-06-20

Review 5.  Current Controversies and Challenges on BRAF V600K-Mutant Cutaneous Melanoma.

Authors:  Alessandro Nepote; Gianluca Avallone; Simone Ribero; Francesco Cavallo; Gabriele Roccuzzo; Luca Mastorino; Claudio Conforti; Luca Paruzzo; Stefano Poletto; Fabrizio Carnevale Schianca; Pietro Quaglino; Massimo Aglietta
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  BRAF V600K vs. BRAF V600E: a comparison of clinical and dermoscopic characteristics and response to immunotherapies and targeted therapies.

Authors:  Corrado Zengarini; Martina Mussi; Giulia Veronesi; Aurora Alessandrini; Martina Lambertini; Emi Dika
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.481

7.  The impact of current treatment modalities on the outcomes of patients with melanoma brain metastases: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mark P van Opijnen; Linda Dirven; Ida E M Coremans; Martin J B Taphoorn; Ellen H W Kapiteijn
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 8.  BRAF Gene and Melanoma: Back to the Future.

Authors:  Margaret Ottaviano; Emilio Francesco Giunta; Marianna Tortora; Marcello Curvietto; Laura Attademo; Davide Bosso; Cinzia Cardalesi; Mario Rosanova; Pietro De Placido; Erica Pietroluongo; Vittorio Riccio; Brigitta Mucci; Sara Parola; Maria Grazia Vitale; Giovannella Palmieri; Bruno Daniele; Ester Simeone
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.