Literature DB >> 34888847

Interacting Genetic Lesions of Melanoma in the Tumor Microenvironment: Defining a Viable Therapy.

R R Maniyar1, S Chakraborty2, T Jarboe3, R Suriano4, M Wallack5, J Geliebter3, R K Tiwari6.   

Abstract

Melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer with an estimated 106,110 newly diagnosed cases in the United States of America in 2021 leading to an approximated 7180 melanoma-induced deaths. Cancer typically arises from an accumulation of somatic mutations and can be associated with mutagenic or carcinogenic exposure. A key characteristic of melanoma is the extensive somatic mutation rate of 16.8 mutations/Mb, which is largely attributed to UV exposure. Bearing the highest mutational load, many of them occur in key driver pathways, most commonly the BRAFV600E in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. This driver mutation is targeted clinically with FDA-approved therapies using small molecule inhibitors of oncogenic BRAFV600E and MEK, which has greatly expanded therapeutic intervention following a melanoma diagnosis. Up until 2011, therapeutic options for metastatic melanoma were limited, and treatment typically fell under the spectrum of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy.Attributed to the extensive mutation rate, as well as having the highest number of neoepitopes, melanoma is deemed to be extremely immunogenic. However, despite this highly immunogenic nature, melanoma is notorious for inducing an immunosuppressive microenvironment which can be relieved by checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The two molecules currently approved clinically are ipilimumab and nivolumab, which target the molecules CTLA-4 and PD-1, respectively.A plethora of immunomodulatory molecules exist, many with redundant functions. Additionally, these molecules are expressed not only by immune cells but also by tumor cells within the tumor microenvironment. Tumor profiling of these cell surface checkpoint molecules is necessary to optimize a clinical response. The presence of immunomodulatory molecules in melanoma, using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and validation of expression in two model systems, human melanoma tissues and patient-derived melanoma cells, revealed that the expression levels of B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), TIM1, and CD226, concurrently with the BRAFV600E mutation status, significantly dictated overall survival in melanoma patients. These molecules, along with herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM) and CD160, two molecules that are a part of the HVEM/BTLA/CD160 axis, had a higher expression in human melanoma tissues when compared to normal skin melanocytes and have unique roles to play in T cell activation. New links are being uncovered between the expression of immunomodulatory molecules and the BRAFV600E genetic lesion in melanoma. Small molecule inhibitors of the MAPK pathway regulate the surface expression of this multifaceted molecule, making BTLA a promising target for immuno-oncology to be targeted in combination with small molecule inhibitors, potentially alleviating T regulatory cell activation and improving patient prognosis.
© 2021. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF-MAP kinase; BTLA/HVEM; CD160; Immunosuppressive environment; Immunotherapy; Melanoma; Mutational load; Neoepitopes; Small molecule inhibitors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34888847     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-83282-7_6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  90 in total

Review 1.  Radiation therapy for advanced and metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Gerald B Fogarty; Angela Hong
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Role for radiation therapy in melanoma.

Authors:  Wenyin Shi
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.495

3.  Melanoma: Molecular Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Management.

Authors:  Yuxin Liu; M Saeed Sheikh
Journal:  Mol Cell Pharmacol       Date:  2014

4.  Primary Melanoma Histologic Subtype: Impact on Survival and Response to Therapy.

Authors:  Michael Lattanzi; Yesung Lee; Danny Simpson; Una Moran; Farbod Darvishian; Randie H Kim; Eva Hernando; David Polsky; Doug Hanniford; Richard Shapiro; Russell Berman; Anna C Pavlick; Melissa A Wilson; Tomas Kirchhoff; Jeffrey S Weber; Judy Zhong; Iman Osman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Cisplatin in cancer therapy: molecular mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Shaloam Dasari; Paul Bernard Tchounwou
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 4.432

6.  The role of surgery in the treatment of nonregionally recurrent melanoma.

Authors:  J H Wong; K A Skinner; K A Kim; L J Foshag; D L Morton
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 7.  Re-evaluating the role of dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma: what have we learned in 30 years?

Authors:  Alexander M M Eggermont; John M Kirkwood
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 8.  Management of melanoma.

Authors:  Pippa Corrie; Mirela Hategan; Kate Fife; Christine Parkinson
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.291

9.  Randomized phase II trial of BCDT [carmustine (BCNU), cisplatin, dacarbazine (DTIC) and tamoxifen] with or without interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) and interleukin (IL-2) in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  S R Johnston; D O Constenla; J Moore; H Atkinson; R P A'Hern; G Dadian; P G Riches; M E Gore
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Dacarbazine combined targeted therapy versus dacarbazine alone in patients with malignant melanoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guan Jiang; Rong-Hua Li; Chao Sun; Yan-Qun Liu; Jun-Nian Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.