Literature DB >> 28857969

Assessing Online Patient Education Readability for Spine Surgery Procedures.

William W Long1, Krishna D Modi, Brittany E Haws, Benjamin Khechen, Dustin H Massel, Benjamin C Mayo, Kern Singh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Increased patient reliance on Internet-based health information has amplified the need for comprehensible online patient education articles. As suggested by the American Medical Association and National Institute of Health, spine fusion articles should be written for a 4th-6th-grade reading level to increase patient comprehension, which may improve postoperative outcomes.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the readability of online health care education information relating to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and lumbar fusion procedures. STUDY
DESIGN: Online health-education resource qualitative analysis.
METHODS: Three search engines were utilized to access patient education articles for common cervical and lumbar spine procedures. Relevant articles were analyzed for readability using Readability Studio Professional Edition software (Oleander Software Ltd). Articles were stratified by organization type as follows: General Medical Websites (GMW), Healthcare Network/Academic Institutions (HNAI), and Private Practices (PP). Thirteen common readability tests were performed with the mean readability of each compared between subgroups using analysis of variance.
RESULTS: ACDF and lumbar fusion articles were determined to have a mean readability of 10.7±1.5 and 11.3±1.6, respectively. GMW, HNAI, and PP subgroups had a mean readability of 10.9±2.9, 10.7±2.8, and 10.7±2.5 for ACDF and 10.9±3.0, 10.8±2.9, and 11.6±2.7 for lumbar fusion articles. Of 310 total articles, only 6 (3 ACDF and 3 lumbar fusion) were written for comprehension below a 7th-grade reading level.
CONCLUSIONS: Current online literature from medical websites containing information regarding ACDF and lumbar fusion procedures are written at a grade level higher than the suggested guidelines. Therefore, current patient education articles should be revised to accommodate the average reading level in the United States and may result in improved patient comprehension and postoperative outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28857969     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  4 in total

1.  Availability and Readability of Spinal Cord Injury Online Information Materials for Spanish Speaking Population in Neurosurgical Academic Programs: A Nationwide Study.

Authors:  Jacques Lara-Reyna; Jorge A Roa; Kurt A Yaeger; Konstantinos Margetis
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-10-14

2.  Readability Analysis of Patient-Accessible Information Regarding Ambulatory Surgical Center Procedures.

Authors:  Conor P Lynch; Elliot D K Cha; Nathaniel W Jenkins; James M Parrish; Shruthi Mohan; Cara E Geoghegan; Caroline N Jadczak; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-10-14

3.  Trends of Spine Surgeries during the First COVID-19 Semi-Lockdown: Survey in a Non-Epidemic Region in Japan.

Authors:  Masaru Tanaka; Masahiro Kanayama; Tomoyuki Hashimoto; Fumihiro Oha; Yukitoshi Shimamura; Takeru Tsujimoto; Yuichi Hasegawa; Hidetoshi Nojiri; Muneaki Ishijima
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-02-10

4.  Can Patients Read, Understand, and Act on Online Resources for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery?

Authors:  Burke Gao; Alan G Shamrock; Trevor R Gulbrandsen; Olivia C O'Reilly; Kyle R Duchman; Robert W Westermann; Brian R Wolf
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-07-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.