Isaac O Kobe1, Mahmoud M Qureshi2, Saidi Hassan2, David L Oluoch-Olunya2. 1. Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, P.O BOX 30270-00100, Nairobi, Kenya. kobeisaac@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, P.O BOX 30270-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The decision to order head CT scans to rule out clinically significant traumatic brain injury in mild head injury in children is made on the basis of clinical decision rules of which the Paediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) CT head rules have been found to be most sensitive. PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of head CT scans done for children with mild head injury and to determine disposition of patients from casualty after the introduction of PECARN head CT rules compared to the period before. The research question is "will introduction of the PECARN CT head rules reduce the proportion of head CT scans requested for children under 18 years with mild head injury at the AKUHN?" METHODS: A before and after quasi experimental study with a study population including all children under 18 years presenting to the AKUHN with mild head injury and a Glasgow coma scale of 14 and above on presentation. Sample size was 85. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients files were analysed in the before study while 43 patients were selected for the after study. The median age was 5 years. The proportion of head CT scans reduced from 56% in the before group to 33% in the after group with no missed clinically significant traumatic brain injury. More patients were discharged home after evaluation in the after group (81%) than in the before group (58%). CONCLUSIONS: The number of head CT scans ordered reduced without missing any clinically significant traumatic brain injury.
BACKGROUND: The decision to order head CT scans to rule out clinically significant traumatic brain injury in mild head injury in children is made on the basis of clinical decision rules of which the Paediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) CT head rules have been found to be most sensitive. PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to determine the proportion of head CT scans done for children with mild head injury and to determine disposition of patients from casualty after the introduction of PECARN head CT rules compared to the period before. The research question is "will introduction of the PECARN CT head rules reduce the proportion of head CT scans requested for children under 18 years with mild head injury at the AKUHN?" METHODS: A before and after quasi experimental study with a study population including all children under 18 years presenting to the AKUHN with mild head injury and a Glasgow coma scale of 14 and above on presentation. Sample size was 85. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients files were analysed in the before study while 43 patients were selected for the after study. The median age was 5 years. The proportion of head CT scans reduced from 56% in the before group to 33% in the after group with no missed clinically significant traumatic brain injury. More patients were discharged home after evaluation in the after group (81%) than in the before group (58%). CONCLUSIONS: The number of head CT scans ordered reduced without missing any clinically significant traumatic brain injury.
Entities:
Keywords:
Head CT (computed tomography) scan; Mild head injury; PECARN (Paediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network)
Authors: Nathan Kuppermann; James F Holmes; Peter S Dayan; John D Hoyle; Shireen M Atabaki; Richard Holubkov; Frances M Nadel; David Monroe; Rachel M Stanley; Dominic A Borgialli; Mohamed K Badawy; Jeff E Schunk; Kimberly S Quayle; Prashant Mahajan; Richard Lichenstein; Kathleen A Lillis; Michael G Tunik; Elizabeth S Jacobs; James M Callahan; Marc H Gorelick; Todd F Glass; Lois K Lee; Michael C Bachman; Arthur Cooper; Elizabeth C Powell; Michael J Gerardi; Kraig A Melville; J Paul Muizelaar; David H Wisner; Sally Jo Zuspan; J Michael Dean; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-09-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Alastair Pickering; Susan Harnan; Patrick Fitzgerald; Abdullah Pandor; Steve Goodacre Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Mark S Pearce; Jane A Salotti; Mark P Little; Kieran McHugh; Choonsik Lee; Kwang Pyo Kim; Nicola L Howe; Cecile M Ronckers; Preetha Rajaraman; Alan W Sir Craft; Louise Parker; Amy Berrington de González Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Franz E Babl; Mark D Lyttle; Silvia Bressan; Meredith Borland; Natalie Phillips; Amit Kochar; Stuart R Dalziel; Sarah Dalton; John A Cheek; Jeremy Furyk; Yuri Gilhotra; Jocelyn Neutze; Brenton Ward; Susan Donath; Kim Jachno; Louise Crowe; Amanda Williams; Ed Oakley Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-05-21
Authors: Sooje Cho; Soyun Hwang; Jae Yun Jung; Young Ho Kwak; Do Kyun Kim; Jin Hee Lee; Jin Hee Jung; Joong Wan Park; Hyuksool Kwon; Dongbum Suh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 3.240