Literature DB >> 28856414

Foreskin reconstruction vs circumcision in distal hypospadias.

Rajay Rampersad1, Yoke Lin Nyo2, John Hutson2,3, Mike O'Brien2, Yves Heloury2,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine if there were differences in the complication rates between foreskin reconstruction (FR) and circumcision (CIRC) in distal hypospadias repairs. The primary outcomes were urethrocutaneous fistula (UF) and dehiscence.
METHODS: The data of distal hypospadias operated between 2005 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were any distal hypospadias repair that required an urethroplasty. The exclusion criteria were follow-up <1 year, redo procedures, chordee greater than 20°, and incomplete data. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed on the results.
RESULTS: 213 patients were included (95 FR and 118 CIRC). The 2 groups were comparable for age at surgery 19.32 months in FR and 14.25 months in CIRC. Mathieu repair was more common in FR (47/95-49.47%) than in CIRC (45/118-38.14%). The total subsequent procedures required were 23 in FR and 57 in CIRC. The incidence of UF was 6.3% (6/95) in FR and 27.1% (32/118) in CIRC (p < 0.001, OR 5.52, 95% CI 2.2-13.9). Complete dehiscence rates were 3.16% (3/95) FR vs 11.02% (13/118) for CIRC (p = 0.037, OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.05-13.74). The incidence of patients requiring reoperation was 18.9% (18/95) in FR versus 45.8% (54/118) in CIRC (p < 0.001, OR 3.61, 95% CI 1.93-6.76).
CONCLUSIONS: Foreskin Reconstruction conferred a significantly lower rate of complications, particularly the UF rate, dehiscence rate, and number of patients that required reoperation. Our rate of complications in the CIRC group is much higher than other published data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circumcision; Distal hypospadias; Foreskin reconstruction; Preputioplasty; Urethrocutaneous fistula

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28856414     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-017-4151-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  12 in total

1.  Factors affecting the outcome of foreskin reconstruction in hypospadias surgery.

Authors:  Brice Antao; Nick Lansdale; Julian Roberts; Ewen Mackinnon
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 1.830

2.  Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair for distal hypospadias.

Authors:  Warren T Snodgrass; Nicol Bush; Nicholas Cost
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.830

3.  Circumcision: Is it worth it for 21st-century Australian boys?

Authors:  Angelika F Na; Sharman P T Tanny; John M Hutson
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 1.954

Review 4.  Foreskin reconstruction does not increase urethroplasty or skin complications after distal TIP hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Warren Snodgrass; Daniel Dajusta; Carlos Villanueva; Nicol Bush
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 1.830

5.  Reconstruction of the hypospadiac hooded prepuce.

Authors:  G Erdenetsetseg; P A Dewan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Results of preputial reconstruction in 77 boys with distal hypospadias.

Authors:  A J Klijn; P Dik; T P de Jong
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the perimeatal-based flap and tubularized incised-plate techniques for primary hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Furan Wang; Yinghua Xu; Hongji Zhong
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Distal hypospadias repair with or without foreskin reconstruction: A single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Mohammed Suoub; Sumit Dave; Yaser El-Hout; Luis H P Braga; Walid A Farhat
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 1.830

9.  A lower fistula rate in hypospadias surgery.

Authors:  Christophe Gapany; Nicolas Grasset; Stéphane Tercier; Pascal Ramseyer; Peter Frey; Blaise J Meyrat
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 1.830

10.  Preputioplasty associated with urethroplasty for correction of distal hypospadias: a prospective study and proposition of a new objective scoring system for evaluation of esthetic and functional outcome.

Authors:  Ciro Esposito; Antonio Savanelli; Maria Escolino; Ida Giurin; Marianna Iaquinto; Francesca Alicchio; Agnese Roberti; Alessandro Settimi
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 1.830

View more
  2 in total

1.  Foreskin reconstruction at the time of single-stage hypospadias repair: is it a safe procedure?

Authors:  Riccardo Manuele; Carlotta Senni; Kalpana Patil; Arash Taghizadeh; Massimo Garriboli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Complications Following Primary Repair of Non-proximal Hypospadias in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuhao Wu; Junke Wang; Tianxin Zhao; Yuexin Wei; Lindong Han; Xing Liu; Tao Lin; Guanghui Wei; Shengde Wu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.418

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.