Literature DB >> 18947716

Factors affecting the outcome of foreskin reconstruction in hypospadias surgery.

Brice Antao1, Nick Lansdale, Julian Roberts, Ewen Mackinnon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite ongoing refinement of numerous techniques, the incidence of complications following hypospadias repair is still significant. The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors that affect the success in childhood of foreskin reconstruction with hypospadias repair.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out of all primary hypospadias repairs with foreskin reconstruction (n=408) over the last 23 years. The hypospadias was coronal in 160 (39%), glanular in 114 (28%), subcoronal in 78 (19%) and distal penile in 56 (14%) cases. Foreskin reconstruction was included in 362 cases suitable for a meatal advancement (191) or distal urethral tubularization (171), and 46 cases for a flip-flap procedure (37 Mathieu, nine Barcat). Outcome analysis was of foreskin-related complications post surgery.
RESULTS: Foreskin repair was successful in 333 cases (92%) that underwent meatal advancement/distal urethral tubularization, and 33 (72%) that underwent a flip-flap operation. Complications related to the foreskin occurred in 10% of the whole group with a urethral fistula rate of 8%. The median age at surgery was 13 months (2-120 months), and the median follow-up period was 11 months (1-100 months).
CONCLUSIONS: A good cosmetic and functional outcome can be achieved with foreskin reconstruction combined with a variety of hypospadias repairs. The outcome in this series was better in cases of distal hypospadias using interrupted polyglactin sutures.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 18947716     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  6 in total

1.  Foreskin reconstruction at the time of single-stage hypospadias repair: is it a safe procedure?

Authors:  Riccardo Manuele; Carlotta Senni; Kalpana Patil; Arash Taghizadeh; Massimo Garriboli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Foreskin reconstruction and preservation of a thin distal urethra: a challenge in tubularized incised plate urethroplasty.

Authors:  Gunter Fasching; Christoph Arneitz; Gabriele Gritsch-Olipp
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Foreskin reconstruction vs circumcision in distal hypospadias.

Authors:  Rajay Rampersad; Yoke Lin Nyo; John Hutson; Mike O'Brien; Yves Heloury
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Complications Following Primary Repair of Non-proximal Hypospadias in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuhao Wu; Junke Wang; Tianxin Zhao; Yuexin Wei; Lindong Han; Xing Liu; Tao Lin; Guanghui Wei; Shengde Wu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.418

5.  The cosmetic results of a simple method for repairing preputial skin defect in hypospadias.

Authors:  Maryam Ghavami-Adel; Mansour Mollaeean; Nakysa Hooman
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 0.364

6.  Does Preputial Reconstruction Increase Complication Rate of Hypospadias Repair? 20-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marco Castagnetti; Michele Gnech; Lorenzo Angelini; Waifro Rigamonti; Vincenzo Bagnara; Ciro Esposito
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.418

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.