| Literature DB >> 28855825 |
Veshara Malapermal1, Izel Botha2, Suresh Babu Naidu Krishna1, Joyce Nonhlanhla Mbatha1.
Abstract
The role of silver nanoparticles (AgNps) is an attractive proposition for advancing modern diabetes therapies and applied science. Stable AgNps with a size range of 3-25 nm were synthesized using aqueous leaf extracts from Ocimum basilicum, Ocimum sanctum, and in combination. The concentration of the extracts facilitated the reduction of silver nitrate that led to the rapid formation of AgNps at room temperature, indicating a higher reaction rate as opposed to harsh chemical methods, and high conversion energy usually involved in the synthesis. The size, shape and elemental analysis were carried out using UV-Visible spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and zeta potential whilst, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) supported by gas chromatography mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) was used to identify the type of capping agents. Inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes retards the rate of carbohydrate digestion, thereby provides an alternative and a less evasive strategy of reducing postprandial hyperglycaemia in diabetic patients. The AgNps derived from O. sanctum and O. basilicum, respectively displayed an inhibitory effect at 89.31 ± 5.32%, and 79.74 ± 9.51%, respectively, against Bacillus stearothermophilus α-glucosidase enzyme model, indicating an enhanced biocatalytic potential compared to their respective crude extracts and the control. Furthermore, the emerging rate of infections in diabetic patients validates the need for the discovery of dual diabetes therapies. As a result, the bioderived AgNps displayed antimicrobial activity against bacterial species Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, and Salmonella species.Entities:
Keywords: AgNps; Diabetes mellitus; Ocimum basilicum; Ocimum sanctum; Silver nanoparticles; α-Glucosidase
Year: 2015 PMID: 28855825 PMCID: PMC5562380 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.06.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Figure 1UV–Visible absorption spectra of AgNps synthesized using (A) aq. O. basilicum leaf extract (B) aq. O. sanctum leaf extract (C) aq. O. sanctum in combination with O. basilicum leaf extract at different reaction times. Progressive colour change indicating the formation of AgNps over a 36 h period; from L → R AgNps formation over 12 → 24 → 36 h.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of AgNps synthesized using (A) aq. O. basilicum leaf extract (B) aq. O. sanctum leaf extract (C) aq. O. sanctum in combination with O. basilicum leaf extract.
Scheme 1Proposed mechanism was elucidated using (A) phenolic compounds present in abundance in Ocimum sp. for the rapid formation of medicinal AgNps (B) amide compounds typically identified in O. sanctum leaf extracts for the rapid formation of medicinal AgNps.
Inhibitory effect of AgNps and crude extracts on α-amylase activity.
| Samples | IC50 (mg/ml) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Acarbose | 48.27 ± 1.79 | <0.0001 | 0.022 |
| AgNps OS | 59.57 ± 3.72∗ | 0.004 | 0.070a |
| AgNps OB | 59.79 ± 6.91 | 0.013 | 0.016a |
| AgNps OS + OB | 54.94 ± 6.56 | 0.014 | 0.169a |
| OS Aq. dist. (leaf) | 61.23 ± 5.24 | 0.007 | 0.028b |
| OS 60% EtOH (leaf) | 66.33 ± 4.26∗ | 0.004 | 0.021b |
| OS 70% EtOH (leaf) | 64.14 ± 13.47 | 0.018 | 0.017c |
| OB Aq. dist. (leaf) | 61.23 ± 5.24 | 0.007 | 0.029b |
| OB 60% EtOH (leaf) | 55.13 ± 9.17 | 0.027 | 0.033b |
| OB 70% EtOH (leaf) | 55.81 ± 7.86 | 0.019 | 0.009c |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM; N = 3; p < 0.05, p-value summary * vs control; OS = O. sanctum, OB = O. basilicum.
Inhibitory effect of AgNps and crude extracts on α-glucosidase activity.
| Samples | IC50 (mg/ml) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Acarbose | 73.75 ± 12.86 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| AgNps OBb | 79.74 ± 9.51 | 0.014 | 1.533c |
| AgNps OSb | 89.31 ± 5.32 | <0.0001 | 0.009c |
| AgNps OS + OBb | 29.03 ± 15.92 | – | NI |
| OS Aq. dist. (leaf)b | 62.25 ± 11.25 | 0.012 | 0.089c |
| OS 60% EtOH (leaf)a | 49.50 ± 2.18 | 0.0002 | 2.566d |
| OS 70% EtOH (leaf)b | 66.00 ± 7.80 | 0.004 | 0.288c |
| OB Aq. dist. (leaf)b | 34.75 ± 3.705∗ | 0.003 | 10.55c |
| OB 60% EtOH (leaf)b | 50.50 ± 3.594 | 0.001 | 0.002c |
| OB 70% EtOH (leaf)b | 69.89 ± 6.871 | <0.0001 | 0.007c |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM; N = 3; p < 0.05, p-value summary * vs control; OS = O. sanctum; OB = O. basilicum; NI = No Inhibition.
Zones of inhibition in (mm) for AgNps against the various bacterial test strains.
| Samples | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgNps OS | 2.000 ± 0.000 | 6.000 ± 1.033 | 3.167 ± 0.601 | 2.000 ± 0.000 | 6.333 ± 1.174 | 2.667 ± 0.333 |
| AgNps OB | 2.000 ± 0.000 | 4.167 ± 0.792 | 2.667 ± 0.333 | NI | 3.667 ± 0.333 | 1.333 ± 0.333 |
| AgNps OS + OB | 3.000 ± 0.000 | 1.500 ± 0.224 | 2.000 ± 0.365 | NI | 2.167 ± 0.477 | 1.000 ± 0.000 |
| OS 10% aq. extracts. | NI | NI | NI | NI | NI | NI |
| OB 10% aq. extracts. | NI | NI | NI | NI | NI | NI |
| OS + OB 10% aq. extracts | NI | NI | NI | NI | NI | NI |
| Control (1 mM AgNO3) | 2.000 ± 0.000 | 1.500 ± 0.224 | 2.000 ± 0.000 | 1.667 ± 0.211 | 2.000 ± 1.095 | 2.333 ± 0.333 |
| +Control (Gentamycin 10 μg) | 10.000 ± 0.000 | 5.000 ± 0.000 | 6.000 ± 0.000 | 4.000 ± 0.000 | – | – |
| +Control (Vancomycin 30 μg) | – | – | – | – | 6.000 ± 0.000 | 3.000 ± 0.000 |
| −Control (distilled water) | NI | NI | NI | NI | NI | NI |
Results are expressed as mean inhibition ± SEM, N = 6; OS = O. sanctum, OB = O. basilicum; NI = No Inhibition.
Grouping variable: 100 μl of bacteria per plate.
Grouping variable: 200 μl of bacteria per plate.