| Literature DB >> 28855736 |
Yonggang Xue1,2, Steven Sai Hang Ho1,2,3, Yu Huang4,5, Bowei Li1,6, Liqin Wang1,2, Wenting Dai1,2, Junji Cao7,8, Shuncheng Lee9.
Abstract
Level of surface ozone (O3) has been increasing continuously in China in recent years, while its contributors and formation pathways are less understood. In this study, distributions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and the roles on O3 pollution have been investigated in a typical industrial city of Baoji in Northwestern China by means of monitoring of their concentrations and other trace gases. The air samples have been collected at three sites according to urban function area. Concentration of VOCs in Weibin site, which near to industrial zone, was higher than most of other cities in China, and the ambient VOCs were dominated by aromatics and alkenes. The temporal variations of VOCs and O3 coincided with the surface wind, implying that the formation of O3 was impacted by both exports of plumes upwind and local photochemical reactions. Result of source apportionment indicated that industrial emission, vehicular exhaust, and solvent evaporation were three major pollution origins. Alkenes and aromatics contributed to the largest fractions of photochemical reactivity, suggesting the strong influences from industrial and traffic sectors. The study presents the characteristic VOCs and other factors in the contribution of O3 formation in China.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28855736 PMCID: PMC5577141 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10631-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Level (in ppbv) and compositions (in %) of VOCsPAMS mixing ratio in Baoji.
| Alkane | % | Alkene | % | Aromatic | % | Isoprene | % | TVOCsPAMS | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baoji | Weibin site (urban) | 14.00 ± 5.00 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.78 ± 0.28 | 1.62 | 48.03 ± 18.15 | The present study |
| Chencang site (suburban) | 10.63 ± 6.88 |
| 1.81 ± 2.58 | 10.6 | 4.46 ± 3.32 | 26.2 | 0.59 ± 0.52 | 3.47 | 17.00 ± 11.36 | ||
| Miaogou site (rural) | 9.67 ± 5.40 |
| 1.23 ± 1.86 | 7.1 | 5.56 ± 4.32 | 32.2 | 0.95 ± 0.75 | 5.50 | 17.27 ± 10.18 | ||
| Beijing | Urban | 15.50 ± 2.00 | 42.6 | 4.40 ± 1.10 | 12.1 | 8.60 ± 1.20 | 23.6 | 0.70–0.80 | 1.92 | 36.4 ± 12.1 | Shao |
| Guangzhou | Suburban | 20.72 ± 1.43 | 56.0 | 7.49 ± 1.42 | 18.5 | 12.37 ± 2.17 | 30.5 | 1.10 | 2.71 | 40.58 ± 0.89 | Zou, Y |
| Hong Kong | Urban | 32.67 | 71.3 | 7.05 | 15.4 | 6.11 | 13.3 | 0.25 | 0.55 | 45.83 | Huang |
Figure 1Temporal variations of TVOCs (sum of VOCsPAMS) with surface wind direction in Weibin site and Miaogou.
Figure 2Regression plots between of VOCs species at Weibin, Chencang and Miaogou sites of Baoji.
Figure 3Source profiles obtained from positive matrix factorization model analysis.
Figure 4PMF derived average source contributions in Baoji.
Estimated OH radical loss rates with VOCsPAMS.
| Region | LOH (S−1) | Composition of VOCsPAMS (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkane | Alkene | Aromatic | isoprene | ||
| Weibin site | 27.20 ± 12.55 | 16.8 |
| 34.6 | 10.9 |
| Chencang site | 12.21 ± 6.89 |
| 19.6 | 27.1 | 11.2 |
| Miaogou site | 11.89 ± 8.25 |
| 10.8 | 19.6 | 32.5 |
Figure 5OH radicals loss rates measured with different classes of VOCsPAMS (top) and abundant alkenes (C2-C6 alkenes) (bottom) in Baoji as a function of mixing ratio.
Figure 6Temporal variation of surface ozone among the sampling time.
The top 20 most abundant O3 formation potential species measured at the Weibin site, Chencang and Miaogou sites of Baoji (ppbv).
| Weibin site | Miaogou Site | Chencang Site | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | STDEV | Average | STDEV | Average | STDEV | |||
| Alkanes | 13.63 | 6.72 | Alkanes | 6.42 | 3.65 | Alkanes | 8.34 | 4.42 |
| Alkenes | 82.13 | 40.57 | Alkenes | 17.26 | 18.03 | Alkenes | 21.35 | 24.01 |
| Aromatics | 89.60 | 50.24 | Aromatics | 19.21 | 14.60 | Aromatics | 27.05 | 17.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1-butene | 9.53 | 8.82 |
|
|
| 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene | 4.04 | 3.31 |
| m,p-Xylenea | 7.35 | 3.84 | dodecane | 2.06 | 1.56 | isoprene | 3.33 | 4.68 |
| isoprene | 6.25 | 3.46 | m,p-xylene | 1.96 | 1.41 | p-diethylbenzene | 2.95 | 2.59 |
| 1-pentene | 5.17 | 2.21 | p-diethylbenzene | 1.94 | 1.41 | toluene | 2.04 | 1.46 |
| benzene | 4.54 | 2.52 | ethylene | 1.79 | 3.65 | dodecane | 1.97 | 1.89 |
| toluene | 4.09 | 2.67 | styrene | 1.65 | 0.82 | o-xylene | 1.94 | 1.14 |
| 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene | 3.56 | 2.16 | 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene | 1.23 | 1.13 | 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene | 1.70 | 1.46 |
| p-ethyltoluene | 3.25 | 8.55 | 1-pentene | 1.20 | 0.67 | ethylene | 1.56 | 3.49 |
| ethylene | 2.48 | 5.22 | m-diethylbenzene | 0.95 | 1.73 | 1-pentene | 1.53 | 0.93 |
| 1-hexene | 2.44 | 1.21 | ethylbenzene | 0.95 | 0.41 | 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene | 1.50 | 1.21 |
| o-xylene | 2.22 | 1.16 | 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene | 0.84 | 0.71 | ethylbenzene | 1.30 | 0.58 |
| isobutane | 2.21 | 4.04 | cyclopentane | 0.78 | 1.79 | styrene | 1.04 | 0.68 |
| 2-methylhexane | 1.46 | 0.60 | o-xylene | 0.76 | 0.52 | m-ethyltoluene | 0.96 | 0.55 |
| cyclopentane | 1.44 | 4.31 | 1-hexene | 0.60 | 0.41 | isobutane | 0.83 | 1.61 |
| 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene | 1.44 | 1.06 | 1-butene | 0.58 | 2.78 | iso-pentane | 0.71 | 0.47 |
| ethylbenzene | 1.22 | 0.69 | 3-methylpentane | 0.55 | 0.30 | 1-hexene | 0.67 | 0.51 |
| 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene | 1.17 | 0.70 | iso-pentane | 0.46 | 0.26 | 1-butene | 0.65 | 2.92 |
| 3-methylpentane | 1.15 | 0.63 | 2-methylheptane | 0.46 | 0.56 | cyclopentane | 0.58 | 1.57 |
a m-Xylene and p-xylene are co-eluted in the chromatographic separation.