Literature DB >> 18234404

Comparison of receptor models for source apportionment of volatile organic compounds in Beijing, China.

Yu Song1, Wei Dai, Min Shao, Ying Liu, Sihua Lu, William Kuster, Paul Goldan.   

Abstract

Identifying the sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is key to reducing ground-level ozone and secondary organic aerosols (SOAs). Several receptor models have been developed to apportion sources, but an intercomparison of these models had not been performed for VOCs in China. In the present study, we compared VOC sources based on chemical mass balance (CMB), UNMIX, and positive matrix factorization (PMF) models. Gasoline-related sources, petrochemical production, and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) were identified by all three models as the major contributors, with UNMIX and PMF producing quite similar results. The contributions of gasoline-related sources and LPG estimated by the CMB model were higher, and petrochemical emissions were lower than in the UNMIX and PMF results, possibly because the VOC profiles used in the CMB model were for fresh emissions and the profiles extracted from ambient measurements by the two-factor analysis models were "aged".

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18234404     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  9 in total

1.  Effect of diurnal changes in VOC source strengths on performances of receptor models.

Authors:  Selami Demir; Arslan Saral; Ferruh Ertürk; S Levent Kuzu; Bülent I Goncaloğlu; Göksel Demir
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  A holistic approach combining factor analysis, positive matrix factorization, and chemical mass balance applied to receptor modeling.

Authors:  N Selvaraju; S Pushpavanam; N Anu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Characterization of VOC sources in an urban area based on PTR-MS measurements and receptor modelling.

Authors:  A Stojić; S Stanišić Stojić; A Šoštarić; L Ilić; Z Mijić; S Rajšić
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic carbons (PAHs) in sediment core from Honghu Lake, central China: comparison study of three receptor models.

Authors:  Huang Zheng; Dan Yang; Tianpeng Hu; Ying Li; Gehao Zhu; Xinli Xing; Shihua Qi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Source identification and apportionment of PM2.5 and PM2.5-10 in iron and steel scrap smelting factory environment using PMF, PCFA and UNMIX receptor models.

Authors:  Lasun T Ogundele; Oyediran K Owoade; Felix S Olise; Philip K Hopke
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Characteristics of ambient volatile organic compounds (VOCs) measured in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Chang-Jie Cai; Fu-Hai Geng; Xue-Xi Tie; Qiong Yu; Li Peng; Guang-Qiang Zhou
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  A Spatial-Temporal Resolved Validation of Source Apportionment by Measurements of Ambient VOCs in Central China.

Authors:  Longjiao Shen; Zuwu Wang; Hairong Cheng; Shengwen Liang; Ping Xiang; Ke Hu; Ting Yin; Jia Yu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Source apportionment of VOCs and their impacts on surface ozone in an industry city of Baoji, Northwestern China.

Authors:  Yonggang Xue; Steven Sai Hang Ho; Yu Huang; Bowei Li; Liqin Wang; Wenting Dai; Junji Cao; Shuncheng Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  UNMIX Methods Applied to Characterize Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds in Toronto, Ontario.

Authors:  Eugeniusz Porada; Mieczysław Szyszkowicz
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2016-06-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.