Literature DB >> 28854536

Use of failure-to-rescue to identify international variation in postoperative care in low-, middle- and high-income countries: a 7-day cohort study of elective surgery.

T Ahmad1, R A Bouwman2, I Grigoras3, C Aldecoa4, C Hofer5, A Hoeft6, P Holt7, L A Fleisher8, W Buhre9, R M Pearse10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence and impact of postoperative complications are poorly described. Failure-to-rescue, the rate of death following complications, is an important quality measure for perioperative care but has not been investigated across multiple health care systems.
METHODS: We analysed data collected during the International Surgical Outcomes Study, an international 7-day cohort study of adults undergoing elective inpatient surgery. Hospitals were ranked by quintiles according to surgical procedural volume (Q1 lowest to Q5 highest). For each quintile we assessed in-hospital complications rates, mortality, and failure-to-rescue. We repeated this analysis ranking hospitals by risk-adjusted complication rates (Q1 lowest to Q5 highest).
RESULTS: A total of 44 814 patients from 474 hospitals in 27 low-, middle-, and high-income countries were available for analysis. Of these, 7508 (17%) developed one or more postoperative complication, with 207 deaths in hospital (0.5%), giving an overall failure-to-rescue rate of 2.8%. When hospitals were ranked in quintiles by procedural volume, we identified a three-fold variation in mortality (Q1: 0.6% vs Q5: 0.2%) and a two-fold variation in failure-to-rescue (Q1: 3.6% vs Q5: 1.7%). Ranking hospitals in quintiles by risk-adjusted complication rate further confirmed the presence of important variations in failure-to-rescue, indicating differences between hospitals in the risk of death among patients after they develop complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of failure-to-rescue rates across health care systems suggests the presence of preventable postoperative deaths. Using such metrics, developing nations could benefit from a data-driven approach to quality improvement, which has proved effective in high-income countries.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  methods; mortality; operative; postoperative care; statistics and numerical data; surgical procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28854536     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  13 in total

1.  [Early recognition of postoperative complications on normal wards : Continuous wireless monitoring for identification of patients at risk].

Authors:  J-C Schewe
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Surgical safety in radical cystectomy: the anesthetist's point of view-how to make a safe procedure safer.

Authors:  Dominique Engel; Marc A Furrer; Patrick Y Wuethrich; Lukas M Löffel
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Appendicitis Mortality in a Resource-Limited Setting: Issues of Access and Failure to Rescue.

Authors:  Brittney M Williams; Laura N Purcell; Carlos Varela; Jared Gallaher; Anthony Charles
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Postoperative Complications and Risk of Mortality after Laparotomy in a Resource-Limited Setting.

Authors:  John Sincavage; Vanessa J Msosa; Chawezi Katete; Laura N Purcell; Anthony Charles
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Preoperative anemia and surgical outcomes following laparotomy in a resource-limited setting.

Authors:  John Sincavage; Brittany Robinson; Vanessa J Msosa; Chawezi Katete; Laura N Purcell; Anthony Charles
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 3.125

6.  Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 202.731

7.  The discussion of risk in German surgical clinical practice guidelines: a qualitative review.

Authors:  Stuart McLennan; Carolin Jansen; Alena Buyx
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2021-08-25

8.  Postoperative Outcomes Following Elective Surgery in India.

Authors:  Vandana Agarwal; Radhakrishnan Muthuchellappan; Bhagyesh A Shah; Pallavi P Rane; Atul P Kulkarni
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-05

Review 9.  Improving detection of patient deterioration in the general hospital ward environment.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Sharon Einav; Rupert Pearse; Samir Jaber; Peter Kranke; Frank J Overdyk; David K Whitaker; Federico Gordo; Albert Dahan; Andreas Hoeft
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  TRACE (Routine posTsuRgical Anesthesia visit to improve patient outComE): a prospective, multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized interventional study.

Authors:  Valérie M Smit-Fun; Dianne de Korte-de Boer; Linda M Posthuma; Annick Stolze; Carmen D Dirksen; Markus W Hollmann; Wolfgang F Buhre; Christa Boer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.