BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neonicotinoid insecticides are described as poor agonists of mammalian nicotinic ACh receptors. In this paper, we show that their effects on mammalian nicotinic receptors differ between compounds. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology was used to characterize the pharmacology of three neonicotinoid insecticides on nicotinic α7 receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Single and combined application of clothianidin, acetamiprid and thiamethoxam were tested. RESULTS: Two neonicotinoid insecticides, clothianidin and acetamiprid, were partial agonists of mammalian neuronal α7 nicotinic receptors, whereas another neonicotinoid insecticide, thiamethoxam, which is converted to clothianidin in insect and plant tissues, had no effect. Pretreatment with clothianidin and acetamiprid (10 μM) ACh significantly enhanced the subsequent currents evoked by ACh (100 μM ) whereas pretreatment with thiamethoxam (10 μM) reduced ACh-induced current amplitudes.A combination of the three neonicotinoids decreased the ACh-evoked currents. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The present findings suggest that neonicotinoid insecticides differ markedly in their direct effects on mammalian α7 nicotinic ACh receptors and can also modulate ACh-induced currents. Furthermore, our data indicate a previously unknown modulation of mammalian α7 nicotinic receptors by a combination of clothianidin, acetamiprid and thiamethoxam. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.11/issuetoc.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Neonicotinoid insecticides are described as poor agonists of mammalian nicotinic ACh receptors. In this paper, we show that their effects on mammalian nicotinic receptors differ between compounds. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology was used to characterize the pharmacology of three neonicotinoid insecticides on nicotinic α7 receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Single and combined application of clothianidin, acetamiprid and thiamethoxam were tested. RESULTS: Two neonicotinoid insecticides, clothianidin and acetamiprid, were partial agonists of mammalian neuronal α7 nicotinic receptors, whereas another neonicotinoid insecticide, thiamethoxam, which is converted to clothianidin in insect and plant tissues, had no effect. Pretreatment with clothianidin and acetamiprid (10 μM) ACh significantly enhanced the subsequent currents evoked by ACh (100 μM ) whereas pretreatment with thiamethoxam (10 μM) reduced ACh-induced current amplitudes.A combination of the three neonicotinoids decreased the ACh-evoked currents. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The present findings suggest that neonicotinoid insecticides differ markedly in their direct effects on mammalian α7 nicotinic ACh receptors and can also modulate ACh-induced currents. Furthermore, our data indicate a previously unknown modulation of mammalian α7 nicotinic receptors by a combination of clothianidin, acetamiprid and thiamethoxam. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.11/issuetoc.
Authors: Larry P Sheets; Abby A Li; Daniel J Minnema; Richard H Collier; Moire R Creek; Richard C Peffer Journal: Crit Rev Toxicol Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 5.635
Authors: P Maienfisch; H Huerlimann; A Rindlisbacher; L Gsell; H Dettwiler; J Haettenschwiler; E Sieger; M Walti Journal: Pest Manag Sci Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 4.845
Authors: A R Davies; D J Hardick; I S Blagbrough; B V Potter; A J Wolstenholme; S Wonnacott Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: David B Sattelle; Steven D Buckingham; Miki Akamatsu; Kazuhiko Matsuda; Ilse S Pienaar; Ilse Pienaar; Andrew K Jones; Benedict M Sattelle; Andrew Almond; Charles D Blundell Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2009-06-21 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; John A Peters; Eamonn Kelly; Neil Marrion; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Udo Kraushaar; Marcel Leist; Dominik Loser; Maria G Hinojosa; Jonathan Blum; Jasmin Schaefer; Markus Brüll; Ylva Johansson; Ilinca Suciu; Karin Grillberger; Timm Danker; Clemens Möller; Iain Gardner; Gerhard F Ecker; Susanne H Bennekou; Anna Forsby Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 5.153
Authors: Jean-Noël Houchat; Alison Cartereau; Anaïs Le Mauff; Emiliane Taillebois; Steeve H Thany Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Joohee Park; Antoine Taly; Jennifer Bourreau; Frédéric De Nardi; Claire Legendre; Daniel Henrion; Nathalie C Guérineau; Christian Legros; César Mattei; Hélène Tricoire-Leignel Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 5.923