Literature DB >> 17561262

Agonist actions of neonicotinoids on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed by cockroach neurons.

Jianguo Tan1, James J Galligan, Robert M Hollingworth.   

Abstract

The agonist actions of seven commercial neonicotinoid insecticides and nicotine were studied on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) expressed by neurons isolated from the three thoracic ganglia of the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Single electrode voltage clamp recording was used to measure agonist-induced inward currents. Acetylcholine, nicotine and all neonicotinoids tested, except thiamethoxam, caused inward currents which were blocked reversibly by methyllycaconitine, a nAChR antagonist. Based on maximum inward currents, neonicotinoids could be divided into two subgroups: (1) those with a heterocyclic ring in their electronegative pharmacophore moiety (i.e. nicotine, imidacloprid and thiacloprid) were relatively weak partial agonists causing only 20-25% of the maximum ACh current and (2) open chain compounds (i.e. acetamiprid, dinotefuran, nitenpyram, and clothiandin) which were much more effective agonists producing 60-100% of the maximum ACh current. These compounds also elicited different symptoms of poisoning in American cockroaches with excitatory responses evident for the low efficacy agonists but depressive and paralytic responses predominating for the most efficacious agonists. No correlation was observed between agonist affinity and efficacy on these nAChRs. Thiamethoxam, even at 100 microM, failed to cause an inward current and showed no competitive interaction with other neonicotinoids on nAChRs, indicating that it is not a direct-acting agonist or antagonist. Despite the probable presence of multiple subtypes of nAChRs on cockroach neurons, competition studies between neonicotinoids did not reveal evidence that separate binding sites exist for the tested compounds. The size of inward currents induced by co-application of neonicotinoid pairs at equal concentration (100 microM) were predominantly determined by the one with higher binding affinity as indicated by EC(50) values, rather than by the one with higher binding efficacy as indicated by maximal current (I(max)). Agonist efficacy, but not affinity, was positively correlated with insecticidal activity. These findings indicate that: (1) agonist affinity and efficacy vary independently with neonicotinoid structure; (2) high agonist efficacy is dependent on the presence of an acyclic electronegative pharmacophore group; (3) agonist efficacy is a significant factor in the insecticidal activity of neonicotinoids to cockroaches; (4) lower efficacy compounds cause excitatory symptoms (Type A), while high efficacy compounds cause depressive/paralytic symptoms (Type B).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17561262     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotoxicology        ISSN: 0161-813X            Impact factor:   4.294


  25 in total

1.  Crystal structures of Lymnaea stagnalis AChBP in complex with neonicotinoid insecticides imidacloprid and clothianidin.

Authors:  Makoto Ihara; Toshihide Okajima; Atsuko Yamashita; Takuma Oda; Koichi Hirata; Hisashi Nishiwaki; Takako Morimoto; Miki Akamatsu; Yuji Ashikawa; Shun'ichi Kuroda; Ryosuke Mega; Seiki Kuramitsu; David B Sattelle; Kazuhiko Matsuda
Journal:  Invert Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-13

2.  Loops D, E and G in the Drosophila Dα1 subunit contribute to high neonicotinoid sensitivity of Dα1-chicken β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Makoto Ihara; Mai Hikida; Hiroyuki Matsushita; Kyosuke Yamanaka; Yuya Kishimoto; Kazuki Kubo; Shun Watanabe; Mifumi Sakamoto; Koutaro Matsui; Akihiro Yamaguchi; Daiki Okuhara; Shogo Furutani; David B Sattelle; Kazuhiko Matsuda
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Herbal extracts and phytochemicals: plant secondary metabolites and the enhancement of human brain function.

Authors:  David O Kennedy; Emma L Wightman
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  Exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides in the U.S. general population: Data from the 2015-2016 national health and nutrition examination survey.

Authors:  Maria Ospina; Lee-Yang Wong; Samuel E Baker; Amanda Bishop Serafim; Pilar Morales-Agudelo; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Activation and modulation of human α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by the neonicotinoids clothianidin and imidacloprid.

Authors:  Ping Li; Jason Ann; Gustav Akk
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Neonicotinoid insecticides differently modulate acetycholine-induced currents on mammalian α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Alison Cartereau; Carine Martin; Steeve H Thany
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Risk assessment for side-effects of neonicotinoids against bumblebees with and without impairing foraging behavior.

Authors:  Veerle Mommaerts; Sofie Reynders; Jana Boulet; Linde Besard; Guido Sterk; Guy Smagghe
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 8.  Diverse actions and target-site selectivity of neonicotinoids: structural insights.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Matsuda; Satoshi Kanaoka; Miki Akamatsu; David B Sattelle
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  The invertebrate pharmacology of insecticides acting at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Andrew J Crossthwaite; Aurelien Bigot; Philippe Camblin; Jim Goodchild; Robert J Lind; Russell Slater; Peter Maienfisch
Journal:  J Pestic Sci       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 1.519

10.  Functional alterations by a subgroup of neonicotinoid pesticides in human dopaminergic neurons.

Authors:  Udo Kraushaar; Marcel Leist; Dominik Loser; Maria G Hinojosa; Jonathan Blum; Jasmin Schaefer; Markus Brüll; Ylva Johansson; Ilinca Suciu; Karin Grillberger; Timm Danker; Clemens Möller; Iain Gardner; Gerhard F Ecker; Susanne H Bennekou; Anna Forsby
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.