| Literature DB >> 28852710 |
Eline M Hutter1, Rebecca J Sutton2, Sanjana Chandrashekar1, Mojtaba Abdi-Jalebi3, Samuel D Stranks3, Henry J Snaith2, Tom J Savenije1.
Abstract
Metal halide perovskites such as methylammonium lead iodide (MAPbI3) are highly promising materials for photovoltaics. However, the relationship between the organic nature of the cation and the optoelectronic quality remains debated. In this work, we investigate the optoelectronic properties of fully inorganic vapour-deposited and spin-coated black-phase CsPbI3 thin films. Using the time-resolved microwave conductivity technique, we measure charge carrier mobilities up to 25 cm2/(V s) and impressively long charge carrier lifetimes exceeding 10 μs for vapour-deposited CsPbI3, while the carrier lifetime reaches less than 0.2 μs in the spin-coated samples. Finally, we show that these improved lifetimes result in enhanced device performance with power conversion efficiencies close to 9%. Altogether, these results suggest that the charge carrier mobility and recombination lifetime are mainly dictated by the inorganic framework rather than the organic nature of the cation.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28852710 PMCID: PMC5569666 DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Energy Lett Impact factor: 23.101
Figure 1(a) Fraction of absorbed photons (FA) as a function of excitation wavelength for a thin (260 nm) vapour-deposited CsPbI3 film before (yellow) annealing and absorption (red, solid line) and emission spectra (red, dotted line) after annealing. (b) Wavelength-dependent absorption coefficient (red) of CsPbI3, calculated using the transmission and absorption spectra for a vapour-deposited (solid line) and spin-coated (dotted line) film. The absorption coefficient of vapour-deposited MAPbI3 (black line, data from ref (21)) is added for comparison. (c–f) Background-subtracted X-ray (Co κα radiation, λ = 1.79 Å) diffraction (XRD) patterns of vapour-deposited CsPbI3 films before (c) and after (e) annealing, taken at room temperature using an airtight sample holder. XRD patterns of the yellow nonperovskite phase at 298 K taken from ref (28) (d) and black perovskite phase taken from ref (17) (f), both simulated for a 1.79 Å Co X-ray source. ● denotes the yellow phase, ■ denotes the black phase, ◊ denotes PbI2, and * denotes SnO2.
Figure 2(a,b) TRMC traces for (a) a vapour-deposited CsPbI3 thin film with thickness of 260 nm and (b) a 350 nm CsPbI3 film spin-coated from a DMF/DMSO solution. Note that the horizontal time scales of (a) and (b) are different. An excitation wavelength of 600 nm was used, and the laser intensity was varied to generate initial charge carrier densities ranging from 1015 to 1017 cm–3. The dotted lines are fits to the experimental data (solid lines). (c) Half lifetime as a function of the initial charge carrier density, corresponding to the CsPbI3 thin films shown in (a) and (b).
Kinetic Parameters Used to Fit the Experimental TRMC Data Shown in Figure , Listing Rate Constants for Second-Order Recombination (k2), Trap Filling (kT), Trap Depopulation (kD), the Trap Density (NT), and Mobilities for Electrons (μe) and Holes (μh) for CsPbI3 Thin Films Prepared via Different Routes
| vapour-deposited | spin-coated | |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 × 10–10 | 1.2 × 10–9 | |
| 9.0 × 1014 | 1.1 × 1016 | |
| 1.0 × 10–9 | 6.0 × 10–8 | |
| 2.5 × 10–11 | 9.0 × 10–11 | |
| ∑μ (cm2/(V s)) | 26 | 23 |
Figure 3(a) Current–voltage (J–V) scans for the highest-efficiency spin-coated (in red) and vapour-deposited (in black) devices. Reverse scans (VOC to JSC) are shown with solid lines, and forward scans (JSC to VOC) are shown with dotted lines. Dark J–V scans are added as dotted lines. (b) SPO of PCE measurements for the same devices, measured at constant voltage.
Statistics from J–V Data from Reverse Scans of 20 Devices from Each Preparation Method (8 devices for SPO)a
| vapour-deposited | spin-coated | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| parameter | best cell | mean ± std. dev. | best cell | mean ± std. dev. |
| 13.0 | 12.6 ± 1.2 | 14.4 | 11.6 ± 2.6 | |
| 1.00 | 0.95 ± 0.06 | 0.80 | 0.74 ± 0.13 | |
| FF | 0.68 | 0.61 ± 0.05 | 0.56 | 0.51 ± 0.07 |
| PCE (%) | 8.80 | 7.27 ± 0.96 | 6.40 | 4.4 ± 1.5 |
| SPO (%) | 7.8 | 6.0 ± 1.3 | 4.3 | 2.5 ± 1.1 |
| SPO ratio | 0.89 | 0.82 ± 0.09 | 0.67 | 0.56 ± 0.14 |
Stand. dev. is the standard deviation; SPO ratio is the ratio of the SPO with the reverse J–V scan for the same device.