| Literature DB >> 28852528 |
Sabuj Kanti Mistry1, Fatema Tuz Jhohura1, Fouzia Khanam1, Fahmida Akter1, Safayet Khan1, Fakir Md Yunus2, Md Belal Hossain1, Kaosar Afsana3, Md Raisul Haque3, Mahfuzar Rahman1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anemia is a significant wide spread public health threat especially among the adolescent girls who are more vulnerable towards low level of hemoglobin particularly of low and middle income countries (LMICs). We investigated the prevalence of anemia among the adolescent girls (10-19 years) in Bangladesh and its socio-demographics distribution.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent anemia; Hemoglobin; Malnutrition; Socio-demographic factors
Year: 2017 PMID: 28852528 PMCID: PMC5568267 DOI: 10.1186/s12878-017-0084-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Hematol ISSN: 2052-1839
Fig. 1Sampling strategy and participants enrolment
Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of adolescent girls
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| (Total | ||
| Age category | ||
| 10–14 years | 629 | 47.9 |
| 15–19 years | 685 | 52.1 |
| Wealth index | ||
| Lowest | 230 | 17.5 |
| Second | 265 | 20.2 |
| Middle | 276 | 21.0 |
| Fourth | 295 | 22.4 |
| Highest | 248 | 18.9 |
| Literacy | ||
| Literate | 1061 | 80.8 |
| Illiterate | 253 | 19.2 |
| Region | ||
| Rural | 1123 | 85.5 |
| Urban | 191 | 14.5 |
| Marital status | ||
| Single | 811 | 61.7 |
| Married | 503 | 38.3 |
| Currently pregnant | ||
| Yes | 45 | 3.4 |
| No | 1269 | 96.6 |
Socio-demographic characteristics and anemia status among adolescent girls
| Socio-demographic characteristics | Anemic | Total | Chi-square |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % (n) | n | |||
| Total | 51.6 (678) | 1314 | ||
| Age | ||||
| 10–14 years | 53.3 (335) | 629 | 1.333 | 0.248 |
| 15–19 years | 50.1 (343) | 685 | ||
| Household wealth quintile | ||||
| Lowest quintile (Poorest) | 54.4 (125) | 230 | 3.519 | 0.475 |
| Second lowest quintile | 54.3 (144) | 265 | ||
| Middle quintile | 50.7 (140) | 276 | ||
| Second highest quintile | 51.5 (152) | 295 | ||
| Highest quintile (Richest) | 47.2 (117) | 248 | ||
| Region | ||||
| Rural | 51.3 (576) | 1123 | 0.292 | 0.589 |
| Urban | 53.4 (102) | 191 | ||
| Marital status | ||||
| Currently single | 52.7 (427) | 811 | 0.94 | 0.332 |
| Currently married | 49.9 (251) | 503 | ||
| Household food security | ||||
| Unsecured | 51.8 (199) | 384 | 0.0492 | 0.824 |
| Secured | 51.5 (479) | 930 | ||
| Currently pregnant | ||||
| No | 52.9 (671) | 1269 | 24.237 | <0.001*** |
| Yes | 15.6 (7) | 45 | ||
| BMI for age | ||||
| Well nourished | 50.8 (607) | 1196 | 3.8137 | 0.05 1* |
| Malnourished | 60.2 (71) | 118 | ||
*** p ≤ 0.01, * p ≤ 0.10
Association of socio-demographic variables with anemia status
| Characteristics | Crude | Adjusted | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR |
| 95% CI | ORa |
| 95% CI | |
| Household wealth quintile | ||||||
| Highest quintile (Richest) | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||
| Second highest quintile | 1.2 | 0.313 | 0.9–1.7 | 1.3 | 0.187 | 0.9–1.8 |
| Middle quintile | 1.2 | 0.417 | 0.8–1.6 | 1.3 | 0.154 | 0.9–1.9 |
| Second lowest quintile | 1.3 | 0.105 | 0.9–1.9 | 1.5 | 0.043** | 1.0–2.2 |
| Lowest quintile (Poorest) | 1.3 | 0.118 | 0.9–1.9 | 1.5 | 0.041** | 1.0–2.3 |
| Region | ||||||
| Rural | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||
| Urban | 1.1 | 0.589 | 0.8–1.5 | 1.3 | 0.119 | 0.9–1.9 |
| Household food security | ||||||
| Unsecured | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||
| Secured | 1.0 | 0.917 | 0.8–1.3 | 1.1 | 0.547 | 0.8–1.4 |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Single | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||
| Married | 1.1 | 0.332 | 0.7–1.1 | 0.9 | 0.650 | 0.7–1.3 |
| Currently pregnant | ||||||
| No | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||
| Yes | 0.2 | <0.001*** | 0.1–0.4 | 0.2 | <0.001*** | 0.1–0.4 |
| BMI for age | ||||||
| Well nourished | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||
| Malnourished | 1.5 | 0.052* | 1.0–2.2 | 1.4 | 0.093* | 1.0–2.1 |
aOR adjusted with girls age, ***p ≤ 0.01, **p ≤ 0.05, *p ≤ 0.10